You can say a lot about the Netherlands, but we're not a poverty stricken place
Certainly, but what about the gypsy communities of the Netherlands?
You can say a lot about the Netherlands, but we're not a poverty stricken place
Certainly, but what about the gypsy communities of the Netherlands?
Of course not. The Romani never steal, not from real people, the people who count, i.e. each other. The rest of us, well we're "gaje", we don't really count. We're the enemy against which all Romani stick together.So...is the Gypsy's idea of a job, stealing?
Is that like their way of life?
They travel. I'm fairly sure the Dutch Gypsies go free of charge here. Those from the Czech Republic, Romania etc. tour Europe instead.Certainly, but what about the gypsy communities of the Netherlands?
That's very true!Now now, if we are going to make comparisons with Israel, we should remember the hebrew wasn't much of a language not too long ago.
Revival of Hebrew language
You don't get it. They already do. Their own. What you are asking is that they decide to follow ours as well.I think they first need to learn how to follow laws, pick up the trash and behave nicely.
How many Romani Gypsy Noble Prize Winners? Oh that's right - NONE. Civilized world tends to reward those who contribute to it, instead of destroying it...
How many Romani Gypsy Noble Prize Winners? Oh that's right - NONE. Civilized world tends to reward those who contribute to it, instead of destroying it...
Horse-wrangling and horse-trading was one of the things the Gypsies did in a big way in Europe for centuries, so it's not really surprising if they keep it up in Brazil.I just found on out on allmighty wiki that Brazil has more than twice the ammount of gypsies than the Czech Republic (we have 700,000 of them), yet I have only seen a handful of gypsies in my life, or at least people I recognised as gypsies.
Over here they travel from town to town and some run itinerant business such circuses or fortune reading. And they are indeed sometimes accused of crimes such as horse theft, but they are not at all a trouble minority. But than again 700,000 in a country of 200 millions can easily go without notice.
I indeed learned some cool stuff on this thread about the gypsies, and did some research of my own and learned some more.Yes. I posted about it already.
Some do, some don't. But it doesn't really matter for the sake of our discussion opened by the OP, which supposes that they do.
Again, some do, some don't. It depends where you go in the world and whom you talk to. But again, it doesn't really matter for the sake of our discussion, which supposes that they do. See below for what this thread is about.
You won't be surprised to learn that there aren't any cookies for realising that the OP alludes to the creation of the Israeli nation. However, that is not the only matter the OP seeks to raise for discussion. As I intended it, the thread is also about:
1) Nationalism and the Nation state.
2) The fate of marginalised people and the task/role of the state in 'co-opting' them. And also how a marginalised people can attain acceptance / justice within a national framework.
3) The plight of the Romani peoples in particular and their history (or lack of it, which is just as revealing) and how their host nations are to include them in a satisfactory manner for all.
This is very relevant in today's world which, in many ways, sees: a) a decreasing sense of national identity caused by b) increased immigration owing to globalisation and heightened flows of labour that come with it. So far, only Verbose has picked up on these and is dealing with them.
4) The justification for the creation of the nation of Israel. If it was acceptable or at least do-able then, is doing such a thing now? Why, or why not is this so?
5) The right that others, 'the powers that be' or 'the rulers of the world order' if you like, have to decide the fate of third parties.
Good point, of course. But usually the people who do get nations are those that manage to organize themselves. It would be very odd, not to mention hard, for foreign countries to organize a people and give a nation of their own if they don't have a strong organization of their own and profound philosophical backing.Great, but did you notice how your post focuses solely on the Jewish desire and planning for a homeland nation? 'I want doesn't get'. What about other parties that may be affected? What about the rights of people who don't or can't organise themselves as the Zionist Movement did?
I do. But as you know it was hardly a matter of the Jews moving in and terrorising the peaceful arabs. The jewish terrorism (which in fact existed and cannot be justified) was actually a response to the hostile environment and to the lack of action by british authorities. I am convinced that the UN was not wrong to "create" Israel in 1948, because by that time there was already a large jewish presence there and they were not going anywhere. It would have been better if the arabs had found then a way to accept that fact.Pointing out how it isn't a perfect analogy hardly justifies the displacement, imprisonment and economic strangulation of the Palestinians and the occupation of what is now Israel (with its ever shifting boundaries). You mention legal purchase of land, but you fail to mention the Jewish terrorism, British Imperialism and arrogance that allowed this to happen, and how America's role in the world today may (or may not) be different. You fail to mention how the Arab League and Arab Higher Committee was simply ignored on the matter, again echoing what goes on today, resulting in violent responses. I could go on. But I think you get the point by now.
BTW, as for the Czech rep. and its Roma minority:
Population:
Czech Rep.: 10,300,000
Gypsies: 150-300 thousands
300.000 gypsies in CR?
Perhaps the gypsy nation should be created there then![]()
That's the highest estimate. Most probably, it is something between 200 and 250 thousand.
@Varwnos: Exactly, it's the highest estimate. The highest estimate for Romania is above 1 million, so...![]()