Many Leaders Game - Discussion Thread

Heh Pholkhero please save me a place as I fancy "playing" the next round whilst I try and think of a way to make Immortal attractive for another round...

Ralph
 
@Ralph

You must be kidding :eek:
Will be quite a challange though :D
 
@RJ:

You could play actually as I'll take a break from the MLG series. I would sponsor an Immortal game gladly...
 
Interestingly, it seems Realms Beyond has gotten into the MLG thing.

Click here to find out more
well, i've always seen the MLG as an outgrowth of potluck, but it's like art imitating life imitating art . . . or something

@ RJ: got it. i'm going to post some info on the game later in the week (prob tomorrow) as i'd like to open it soon. We seem to be starting the new games around the time of the 4th round or so in the games.

@ Imhotep: you mean a 'genuinely hand-crafted legendary builder map' for MLG ~ nice! :yup: :goodjob:
 
sorry, i mean, 'genuinely hand-crafted legendary and extremely modest builder map' :D
 
I must admit with a nice start and Unrestricted Leaders I think the gap between Emperor and Immortal isn't that great.

Anyway Pholkhero with the games in your series you canit surely be worried by the level of challenge!!

Ralph
 
i have an idea, how about 1 mlg where we pick some of the best unrestricted combo's, and another where we pick the worst unrestricted combo's?
 
My map and the concept is ready. Just tell me if and when you want to play it...
 
I've had trouble keeping up in MLG6 (should be able to by the end of this week), and in general, it is moving a lot slower. Perhaps we are in need of a short break?
 
i, too, was wondering about a break, but was also going to post MLG07 in the Registration thread as well to get some new people in.

I've been procrastinating with this as I need to finally put together my Rd4 report for 6 (i've had it played for at least a week or so), and i want to do that first.

*Should* we wait though? Let's have actual sign-ups start now for MLG07: Man vs Cottage, where we'll be having two teams: Commerce and Specialist. It will, again, be a race to the stars as, imo, that's the best test of your economy. Players will be judged by total commerce output (GNP) as well as most beakers per city, most beakers per civ, and most beakers per team.

I will play if we have an odd number of players?

Roster:
Ozbenno: SE Liz
TriviAl(?): CE Liz
Ralph Jackson: open
pawelo: CE ??
r_rolo: open
The_LastOne (couldn't tell if you were signing up)
OPEN (for as many people as want to sign up)
[pholkhero]
 
If TriviAl is OOP for this one, I'll gladly take CE Liz :p

Otherwise, it'll be a Philo Leader CE - haven't really looked closer on it yet.
 
well, don't think i'll be making CE's use Philo's and SE's financial; i want to see them in all their glory!
 
i was hoping for an SE with Ramesses
 
May I get a SE Pericles :lol: ?

Seriously, I wanna try a A wat priest strat + religious wondering( i was impressed with the sheer prod power of QSH in MLG 5 ( that I still have to finish :blush: ) ).... So maybe a Ind civ ( no matter who... but Ramesses would be nice if not taken yet ;) ) for me.....
 
I'm defintely up for it. Although a mild delay would probably sit well with me! Just ramping my Civing back up after some minor RL related setbacks.

The Liz challenge sounded fun when it was mentioned - happy to take either half of her. Ooer! :mischief:
 
I am definitely up for it and may celebrate Celebrity Deathmatch Vanilla crushing its rivals by Giving Peter another run out !!

Care to expand on restrictions for CE vs SE players to bring some debate on

However I also think a couple of weeks gap to reinvigorate people (and recruit additions) might be a good idea.

Ralph
 
Back
Top Bottom