Civ4 is what it is. Right, but CIv5 has yet to bow down to those weak principles.
We should always speak out agaist things that are a threat to are childrens's civving way of life
Map size vs. Number of Civs?
- Thread starter john k
- Start date
Civ4 is what it is. Right, but CIv5 has yet to bow down to those weak principles.
We should always speak out agaist things that are a threat to are childrens's civving way of life
JujuLautre
Deity
Ok, so you prefer ranting all the time and annoy people instead of doing usefull stuff? Your choice, but I still find it completly stupid.
Now I'll let you back on topic, thanks for your answer.
Now I'll let you back on topic, thanks for your answer.
Your behavior is puzzling to me
You seem to like to troll on me. I layed down reasonable explantions for all who expressed doubts with my Original post. Next I had others who shared sim views come to back my opinions.
.
Here I gave an opinion and was attacked. I defended the opinion, the other member was left with nothing but grammer nazi remarks of the hypocritical kind
Thats a sum up, so where was the rant?PLease quote me instead of make generalized unbacked comments.
ABout positive feedback? I offer tons. I will give you a list of links where solutions to CIv4's woes are given by me. They were responded to as insightful and called great ideas by others civ4 members aswell.
Let me know what ya need to believe. I can see what I can dig up on free time
thanks
OH and Usefull? ID say my posts are the most used in the forum
You should really read your posts again. You're the one doing the attacking.
When a young lad like you has ran out of ammo to protect his point or take on another's, he resorts to grammer or unproper prose crimes, your case for the 3rd or 4th time.
Read the rules Heck its no a big deal but You can't even quote any questionable phrases or ill written paragraphes that are so jumbled. (unbacked acusations like all your claims )
I think you struggled to come to a proper understanding with what constitutes the annalysis put forth here. It invloved facets from both games response systems in regards with the potential facters that led one to prevail over the other in max optimization.
The leading Conclusion being the best rigs are not geared to play civ4 to its full potential due to many program flaws (mostly graphics based) is derived from plenty examples and proven with many comparisons using the 2d model. However, IT became apparent to most you don't comprehend these issues that lead to so much negative critisms being put forth over the years .
That was easy to tell when you dismissed all as being as cheap skates who can't complain when they own a cheap mainframe
Bah, Typical narrowminded tunnel vision remark that completely misses the mark and shows who's really living in the dark
Ya lets you and I face what MOST already know. Your the guy who can't find his flow, like getting a feel for one thing being discussed here. You got sucked in the undertow of petty insults and accustaions or 'Prove it' lamtrocitys to most obvious evidence (# of civ prefrence)
You say I "garble" my info? I bet the readers have a way of understanding what I say and how it binds.
No its you who dosn't t know where to begin, not able to be contesting the facts has you tryin a 'member spin'
You have shown your posts to be nothing but a frustration fueled stubbern trial of blind resentment outright exadurations, unbacked lies, n all with troll ties towards grammer elitism.
You know T.A. I'm getting really tired of wasting my time with you. You really don't have very much to say and even then you don't say very well. Please learn how to communicate in proper English. I wouldn't normally mention something like that if I thought it wasn't your first language but I get the distinct impression it is. To spare me the hassle of your ranting and trying to decipher just what it is you're carrying on about, I'm just going to put you on my ignore list.
Balderstrom
Emperor
Well you need to take T.A.Jones with a grain of salt, he pretty much says the same thing over and over and over again in nearly every thread. CIV 4 sucks, CIV 3 rawks.
I disagree. I like to offer up my opinion thats unique for the topic. If thats referring to the issue at hand by stating a soloution civ3 has better implimented, so be it.
Its not planned. IM trying to be helpful and let the person see why things are this way and how they can improve(civ4 performance in this case))
If I based on civ3 I only refered to specific examples where Civ4's programing ought to be more like it, mybe improved version of it!.
Ya sure I'll share this with the community. Feel free to contest me or jest with me just don't take it all seriously!... Jeez guys!
This branding "T.A is one tracked who's posts are meaningless" is borderline flame and singled out agression. ( that I don't take personal
)On each thread you imply I gleefully glide onward preaching "civ4 sucks play 3 instead?" Sounds like alotta fun but I can be doing better stuff.
I understand how civ4 fans who havn't played civ3 or bowed out before new solutions came in tow with the modders revolution overhauling from groundup, are frustrated but believe it or not, IM helping the community.
The" civ4 is a modders dream" pitch never materilized for those with the " Double yer Pleasure" (Xpanded ) wish.
We found once the mod was done we were lucky if it would run. Its things like this, you call my grain of salt material?
I was showing the state of strategy as is now becoming more the subsitution. EX: More moddabilty for less stabilty or better eyecandy and better Multi- player high-speed band instead of more freedom to expand in larger uncharted land.
When I say certain things pertaining to the topic at hand I go back to this once vibrant consumer demand just one more turn" following. You know, That catch phrase the suits coined to market civ4 based on the addiction success of Conquests . Where did they lead these loyal followers. Thats the stuff I pose to those on these forums
So Screw off with your loser guided innuendos ; ). I mean lets get on the right track. Improve the right model for best implimentation.
We can have a civ5 thats keeps core strategy alive.
NEWS UPDATE FOR MY READERS AND FANS
Spoiler :
l )
"** 
I don't have to take him at all. That's the beauty of having an ignore option on the forum.
