DanQ
Owner, Civilized Communication
Excalibur?o
xcl......

Excalibur?o
xcl......
xcl = ten character limitExcalibur?![]()
Ah. I believe I know what you're getting at, but I think a better word is "cohesive", not "consistent", and I will agree with that -- to an extent -- on the composite sites.
Apolyton was originally made up of 2.5 sites (the 'half' being my CivI site) and then a third with our Alpha Centauri coverage -- that's a few, not "various" in my book(and the latter is the 'latest' from 1999). The site has had three different hosts to date, but has changed domains only once: from a sub-domain off of our first host to its own and current domain. That's not "several".
![]()
Ahhhh.xcl = ten character limit
The x stands for ten (in latin) and I think you can guess what the c and l stand for. It's used to lengthen a post to fall in the character limit.
Apparently, this list of yours is short.Apparently the only advantage Apolyton has over us is a lack of the xcl (it really should be called ten character minimum)
In the forums, there are multiple styles to choose from. (I take it that is what you're referring to mostly if not specifically.)The grey is too much. That is probably the main complaint from CFC users.
The issue is not money -- we are using a highly customized version of vB2 which makes porting data to vB3 an involved and time-consuming process. There is an extended discussion on this in a recent thread on Apolyton.Also I'd put the money you are currently using to have 10 domains to get a new version of vb as I can't imagine Jelsoft are still patching vb2 which is quite dangerous to use outdated software on a site.
Again, see above re: different forum styles.CFC also looks much more professional than poly, in part because it has images in the skin and more colours than shades of grey and one shade of red.
No argument there. We are wanting to replace it and have for some time but, once more, it's an involved process combined with our limited staffing and time of those staff members.The ApolytonPlus links and register look horrible
Yes, in certain respects it is. So is CFC's homepage as far as I'm concerned.and the main page is very crowded.
That it's "a few tables and text", so to speak, isn't an issue to me.Just switching colours for alternate skins doesn't change the fact that your template is nothing more than a few tables and text to start with.
Fair assessment, assuming our definitions of "user-friendly" are on par of course.I think CFC is more "user-friendly" when it comes to modding civ-games,
But Apolyton is far from dead I think.
In the forums, there are multiple styles to choose from. (I take it that is what you're referring to mostly if not specifically.)
tonyf12 said:CFC also looks much more professional than poly, in part because it has images in the skin and more colours than shades of grey and one shade of red.
Poly has been dead or at least slow in recent years.
Although, if you don't like [the homepage], you can just go straight to the forum main page.
I post there on the odd occasion
Where have you been Gramps?