Who's really behind Islamic terrorism? 7/7 etc.

Xenocrates

Deity
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
2,378
Location
Liverpool
I had an unexpected personal epiphany recently and it seems I owe the Americans on this board an apology. I found a link on the Fortean times website to a story about the Bilderberg group:

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=358df7bd-7a54-41e4-9366-df1733597c30&k=96354

I was going to post it on the North America Union thread, as I know some of you are interested in that, but I couldn’t find it again. The Bilderbergs are contenders for the secret Government or Illuminati that some conspiracy theorists refer to. This article suggests that the Canadian/US union is their agenda.

Then I followed a link trail to a guy called Haroon Aswat:

http://www.infowars.net/Pages/Aug05/020805Aswat.html

Basically Aswat was working for British Intelligence while he was setting up an ‘Al Quaeda’ training camp in Bly, Oregon in 1999, yes I know you’re thinking WTH!!, but there’s more. His partner was arrested and prosecuted but the British somehow twisted American arms and had Aswat released. He crops up again in the July the 7th bombings. He received telephone calls from each of the 4 alleged 07/07 suicide bombers shortly before the attacks. The day before the attacks he flew to Pakistan and was arrested but released, again (this has happened several times). Thus proving (as much as possible) that he continued to be a British intelligence asset after the bombings. Before bombings = MI5/SIS agent, after bombings = MI5/SIS agent - during bombings ???? You see where I’m going with this?

London’s nickname is Londonistan as it has been widely condemned as the global nervecentre of Islamic terrorism. Some of the Islamic fundamentalism is being coordinated from London, but is it officially coordinated?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/07/24/MNGN67SF4U1.DTL

Anyway, now on to the 07/07 bombings. This website is very instructive and I really recommend reading it through:
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-mind-the-gaps-part-1.html

There hasn't been very much discussion about 07/07, but it's every bit as suspicious as 9/11 if not more so. There are many incongruities in the 07/07 narrative and some key comparisons with 9/11 (except obviously the scale of the attack):

http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=1777

There are several flaws in the official report that PROVE that it is wrong. I won’t spend space on that, read the Julyseventh website, you'll be amazed at the outlandishness of the official report. I just want to look at the bombs. From the same website:

“Christophe Chaboud, head of the French Anti-Terrorism Co-ordination Unit, was also reported to have said a day later that the explosives used were "military in origin". He also mentioned that they were possibly trafficked from the Balkans, since it would generally be quite difficult to obtain military explosives, unless the men had "someone on the inside" to get them out of the military establishment.

Other sources have pinpointed the explosives as being C4 (which is easy to trace) or perhaps some of the 350 tonnes of RDX that were mysteriously stolen from Al Qaqaa in Iraq after the ‘US lead’ invasion. This is interesting: http://www.alchemysite.com/blog/2004/10/few-pounds-here-few-pounds-there.html

RDX is the explosive that was used in the Madrid bombings. Did it come from Iraq and if so, how? The police still have not said officially which explosives were used in London, which is odd since chemical analysis doesn’t usually take a year. If we assume that Chaboud knows what he’s talking about, and he’s French so of course he does, the Balkan link is significant.

‘Former Justice Dept. prosecutor and terror expert, John Loftus, revealed that the so-called Al-Muhajiroun group, based in London had formed during the Kosovo crisis, during which Fundamentalist Muslim Leaders (Or what is now referred to as Al Qaeda) were recruited by MI6 to fight in Kosovo.’

http://www.spinwatch.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1446

Aswat was a member of this group. It seems plausible that Aswat was used by British intelligence to recruit dumbass patsies for use in terrorist campaigns against the Russians and Serbs. Indeed that is precisely what I charge. Obviously in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Chechnya, but maybe also on 07/07? Many people seem to think so. There is evidence that Haroon Aswat recruited the 4 bombers and that at least one of them was a known danger, but was mysteriously left unwatched so that he could carry out the 7/7 attack. The original meaning of Al Quaeda was ‘the list’ and it referred to the people that would be ‘called up’ to fight (usually against the Russians). It was never an international terror group (and certainly not an anti-US one) until the press and propagandists painted it as one. Then the reality changed to match to the image, which is the danger of this type of disinformation.

There are many reports on the Internet that Aswat is considered to be the mastermind behind the 7/7 operation. Yet the official report states that 4 men and 4 men alone were responsible for the July 7 bombings. There have been no further arrests despite enormous evidence of the involvement of others. Haroon Aswat disappears from the Internet towards the end of last year. I would be in the debt of anyone who can find recent news regarding him. Has he been neutralized by his handlers by death or prison?

Iraq:

‘In earlier reports, we focused on the operation of two undercover British SAS operatives, dressed in traditional Arab clothing, who were planning to set off bombs in the main square in Basra, coinciding with a religious event.

They were arrested by Iraqi police and subsequently "liberated" by British forces in a major military assault, directed against the Iraqi police authorities with tanks and armed cars.’

"A number of Iraqis apprehended two Americans disguised in Arab dress as they tried to blow up a booby-trapped car in the middle of a residential area in western Baghdad on Tuesday.
Residents of western Baghdad's al-Ghazaliyah district told Quds Press that the people had apprehended the Americans as they left their Caprice car near a residential neighborhood in al-Ghazaliyah on Tuesday afternoon (11 October 2005). Local people found they looked suspicious so they detained the men before they could get away. That was when they discovered that they were Americans and called the Iraqi puppet police."

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20051015&articleId=1094

I’ve stated before that I don’t believe that ‘insurgents’ are behind most of the killings in Iraq. What scares the British and Americans the most is a peaceful resistance movement, perhaps modeled on Gandhi’s campaign. What scares the Israelis the most is a peaceful resistance in the occupied territory. The most effective way to resist is with words not bulllets, and any action 'we' can take to anger our weaker enemies into using bullets works in 'our' favour.

These two accounts prove that US and British troops are killing civilians with both bullets and bombs in Iraq – terrorist style. I believe this is what the British SAS man, who refused to serve citing daily illegal acts as a reason, was hinting at.

I am proposing that many governments routinely use terrorism and murder as a means of social control and as a means to facilitate the oil grab in Iraq and maintain control of occupied territory. Not only terrorism against others but terrorism against themselves. Haroon ASSHAT, you Muslim-hater, you should be ashamed of yourself.

My apologies to any American present who might have gained the impression that I believed that you were the playground bullies, whereas it looks increasingly like most of the strings, at least as far as Islamic terrorism is concerned, are being pulled from London.
 
MobBoss said:
Holy conspriracy theory batman. I cant help but point out if there was a shred of truth to any of that it would be plastered on every tv, newspaper and radio all over American.

Shows what you know Mobboss it is true but "they" control all the media thats why you haven't heard about it. If fact this thread is only allowed to be posted so you'll think its not true.
 
skadistic said:
Shows what you know Mobboss it is true but "they" control all the media thats why you haven't heard about it. If fact this thread is only allowed to be posted so you'll think its not true.

Why do you hate freedom? :(












j/k :)
 
skadistic said:
Shows what you know Mobboss it is true but "they" control all the media thats why you haven't heard about it. If fact this thread is only allowed to be posted so you'll think its not true.

Well, duh...they can control the media...but can they control the voices in my head?

Nor can they control my wearing of my tinfoil hat. Neener, Neener.:lol:
 
You know, the more and more I read the more and more it does smell bad. I think 9/11 would've been impossible to get away with, but furthering the effects of it in other western nations isn't so hard to imagine. I will note a couple of things, most of your links are hadly reliable, and generally considered fringe. Also, for them to get away with such things (espeially 9/11) would be very difficult for governments that don't run very efficiently.

It is more likely that this would be a small elitist group's agenda. They would have interests and ways of pulling such things off (again I denounce that this could've been in the case of 9/11). The problem you have is wanting to clean muslioms of all blame my good sir, as in a wag the dog scenario it is best to choose a believeable boogey-man.

http://www.historyguy.com/new_and_recent_conflicts.html

Hate to say it but most of the world's current major onflicts revolve around muslims, and almost all of those muslims are the agressors. So while your theory that the west is being lead by an evil illuminati type orginization cannot be written off as total lunacy, your defense of muslims is highly irrational and (borrowing from sidhe here) w/o historical merit.
 
And in other breaking news..........It appears that the rise of the Nazi party in the 1930's was a plot of the Elders of Zion........ Do you make a new tinfoil hat every day or do you just reshape the same one?
 
MobBoss said:
Well, duh...they can control the media...but can they control the voices in my head?

Nor can they control my wearing of my tinfoil hat. Neener, Neener.:lol:
Just be sure that you're using actual tin foil. Aluminum foil serves to enhance the signals.

Stay alert!
Trust no one!
Keep your laser handy!
 
Tulkas12 said:
So while your theory that the west is being lead by an evil illuminati type orginization cannot be written off as total lunacy, your defense of muslims is highly irrational and (borrowing from sidhe here) w/o historical merit.

That wasn't my proposition. I'm more inclined to believe a more mundane theory: that there are various individuals and groups that enjoy the game of this type of espionage and who employ their sociopathic brains in that pursuit.

This started with the Bilderbergers, and while they are a classic conspiracy, in the sense of being powerful and meeting in secret, there is no evidence that they are more than producers of hot air. However, my experience of human nature tells me that you can't put a large number of people in the same room without sub-groups spontaneously forming. This is something I've seen in every classroom and every workplace. I'm not so sure about Bilderberger sub-groups, but they must exist.

I won't answer the point about whether Muslims are evil.

I have made a specific proposition: that Al Quaeda was originally a British intelligence tool., that Haroon Aswat is an agent and that he was involved in July the 7th and that the official 'narrative' is absolute rubbish and that British and American soldiers are committing terrorism in Iraq.

I implied that the best way to catch people with the energy and motivation to undertake anti-Government activity is to set up such a terrorist organisation yourself and use it as a 'honey pot' so instead of fighting you, they become your stooges. This IS what happened in Northern Ireland, the British have so infiltrated the IRA that it can't be considered to have any independence from them at all.

There are many many links to this information on the net, many from established sources. If you google 'Haroon Aswat', 'Madrid bombing', July 7 c4explosive' etc you can find then yourself. I have a list as long as my arm of links. I haven't posted on this forum for a month. Doesn't that tell you that I have done my research?

This strategy is a continuation of operation Gladio, which I also invite you to check on the net.

Among the "smoking guns" unearthed by Ganser is a Pentagon document, Field Manual FM 30-31B, which details the methodology for launching terrorist attacks in nations that "do not react with sufficient effectiveness" against "communist subversion." Ironically, the manual states that the most dangerous moment comes when leftist groups "renounce the use of force" and embrace the democratic process. It is then that "U.S. army intelligence must have the means of launching special operations which will convince Host Country Governments and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger." Naturally, these peace-throttling "special operations must remain strictly secret," the document warns.

Indeed, it would not do for the families of the 85 people ripped apart by the Aug. 2, 1980 bombing of the Bologna train station to know that their loved ones had been murdered by "men inside Italian state institutions and ... men linked to the structures of United States intelligence," as the Italian Senate concluded after its investigation in 2000.

Last month, it was widely reported that the Pentagon is considering a similar program in Iraq. What was not reported, however -- except in the Iraqi press -- is that at least one pro-occupation death squad is already in operation. Just days after the Pentagon plans were revealed, a new militant group, "Saraya Iraqna," began offering big wads of American cash for insurgent scalps -- up to $50,000, the Iraqi paper Al Ittihad reports. "Our activity will not be selective," the group promised. In other words, anyone they consider an enemy of the state will be fair game.

Strangely enough, just as it appears that the Pentagon is establishing Gladio-style operations in Iraq, there has been a sudden rash of terrorist attacks on outrageously provocative civilian targets, such as hospitals and schools, the Guardian reports. Coming just after national elections in which the majority faction supported slates calling for a speedy end to the American occupation, the shift toward high-profile civilian slaughter has underscored the "urgent need" for U.S. forces to remain on the scene indefinitely, to provide security against the ever-present terrorist threat.

From http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2005/290205swordplay.htm

What can I say? The case is a good one. It's consistent and logical. But is it true? Now that I don't know, but it's worth considering. 9/11 has been debated endlessly, let's try to stick to July the 7th. If you read http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/ and find my analysis or conclusion wanting, then debate it. If it just shocks you and you've nothing sensible to say, then do me a favour and clear off!
 
no offence but we already know that the mujahhadeen have been our mates. we trained them (the west) we gave them equipment. anyone who thinks that lying and underhanded behaviour and crap intellegence belongs soley to america must look at their own country. especially im afraid to say britian.
we have gone tits up in this third term.

it is a intresting read tho, and there are similairitys and it makes a vauge sense.
to be honest i just wouldnt be surprised.
 
The Bilderbergs are simply a branch of theirs. They handle the economic dealings. They might have something to do with it, but not too much.
 
You are making too much of this.
There is no secret society, it is just England trying to weaken the US so they can one day reclaim their old colonies...
 
Man I wish I could write that again and remove the introductory paragraph about the Bilderbergs. I put in in only to describe how I found out what I did, it is not part of my thesis and I make no claims about the reality or otherwise of the stories regarding it.

Can we forget about the flippin' Bilderbergs for a minute and debate the issue about which I am talking - which is 'who is behind the terrorism'?
 
July 7th Terror Rehearsal Operation
July 7th Explosions occur during Anti Terrorist Rehearsal Operation
"...at half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning"

....as spoken by Mr Peter Power, Managing Director of Disaster and Crisis Management firm, Visor Consultants.

To date, the client for whom Visor Consultants was running this anti-terror operation has never been revealed.. and ... neither Peter Power nor any other representatives of Visor Consultants have been quizzed about the exact nature and extent of their operation that morning.

BS?

it appears some profited by short selling the British pound in the 10 days leading up to the attacks.

The pound fell about 6 percent (approximately 1.82 to 1.72) against the dollar for no apparent reason – until, of course, the terror attacks sent the British markets reeling still further.

"This was an almost unprecedented weakness and far too sharp to be a coincidence," one economist with more than 35 years of experience in the investment industry, told Joseph Farah"

BS? (remember the official story - no mastermind 4 guys did it alone)

Guardian journalist Mark Honingsbaum also recorded several witnesses speaking of explosions under the floor of the train, the floors of the trains being torn up and floor tiles flying upwards

BS? (the official story blames bombs in rucksacks, which doesn't match the evidence)

The September 19 arrest of two undercover Special Air Service officers in Basra, traveling in an unmarked car containing weapons and explosives, has led to numerous accusations that they were acting as agents provocateurs.

The BBC reported that the SAS men’s car contained “weapons, explosives and communications gear,” before claiming that these were “standard kit for British special forces.”

Chinese news service Xinhuanet: SAS “soldiers were using a civilian car packed with explosives.”

It also cites a report by Jonathan Finer of the Washington Post’s foreign office, stating, “Monday’s clashes stemmed from the arrest by Iraqi police on Sunday of two Britons, whom Iraqi police accused of planting bombs.”

Amongst a number of reports from Syrian and Turkish news sources, it singles out a Syrian correspondent in Baghdad, Ziyad al-Munajjid. He writes: “Many analysts and observers here had suspicions that the occupation was involved in some armed operations against civilians and places of worship and in the killing of scientists. But those were only suspicions that lacked proof. The proof came today through the arrest of the two British soldiers while they were planting explosives in one of the Basra streets.

All BS?


Taken from http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/index.html and http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/sep2005/basr-s28.shtml
 
Xenocrates said:
BS?
BS? (remember the official story - no mastermind 4 guys did it alone)
BS? (the official story blames bombs in rucksacks, which doesn't match the evidence)
All BS?
Taken from http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/index.html and http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/sep2005/basr-s28.shtml

Yes sir, I think it's all BS.
When some "theories" don't make it to any media but an obscur website (www.julyseventh.co.uk) or an evidently biaised one (www.wsws.org), sorry but I can't give it a milligramme of credibility. If that stroy was 0.001% true, at least one of the major non openly biaised media would have covered it. I don't see any thing about that on CNN, BBC, Le Monde, NYTimes, The Guardian, The Economist, The FT, Haaretz, etc. So sorry, I don't see any reason why those newspaper wouldn't have published an article about that if there were any even semi-valid evidence supporting it
 
HannibalBarka said:
When some "theories" don't make it to any media but an obscur website (www.julyseventh.co.uk) or an evidently biaised one (www.wsws.org), sorry but I can't give it a milligramme of credibility.

There are several stories that I have pieced together from many sources into one narrative.

Primary sources include:

The Guardian - http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/story/0,,1804771,00.html and http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/story/0,,1806794,00.html
The BBC - can't get it up in China BBC is censored but you could if you tried.

The times online - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1715122,00.html

The seattle times - http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002399039_aswat24m.html


And http://usa.mediamonitors.net/headlines/caught_red_handed_british_undercover_operatives_in_iraq

I never buy branded goods. But if you want famous-name branded links and believe that to be a mark of accuracy, there you go.

You know, I did a lot of work on this hypothesis and I think iif it is to be argued down, it should be argued down with at least a little intelligence.
 
Back
Top Bottom