American footprint 30 000 year old -- Sciencist

Status
Not open for further replies.
CurtSibling said:
Your ideology doesn't respect the right to be atheist.

And I am cutting you slack.

So stop the whine tactics please, they do not gain any ground.

.

You can be an athiest if you want to, I just think that you're wrong. Is that any different from what anyone thinks about people who he disagrees with? No.

Then I would hate to see you when you're not cutting me slack, because then you'd be incredibly rude instead of just really rude.

I'm not whining, I'm asking you to kindly not call me a "fundy". I find it impolite and insulting, so please knock it off. It's not that hard, just be nice. You wouldn't like it if I started calling you names.
 
North King said:
One last OT post for me.



Mud can form over old, dried mud.



That would be interesting.

Inside an old footprint? That doesn't make sense.

If I find the pictures I'll PM them to you.
 
Elrohir said:
Perfection: Whatever happened to not hijacking the thread? There's a reason I PMed those to you instead of posting them here.
You brought 'em up!

I was going to post them in my thread instead, but I'm lazy.
 
Perfection said:
You brought 'em up!

I was going to post them in my thread instead, but I'm lazy.

I PMed them to you so the Mods wouldn't close the thread! If you wanted to post them on the board you should have put them in your thread or started a new one.
 
Elrohir said:
I PMed them to you so the Mods wouldn't close the thread! If you wanted to post them on the board you should have put them in your thread or started a new one.
I should have, but I'm lazy.

Of course, you're now just dodging the fact that you can't demonstrate that this is more then a funny-looking rock
 
Elrohir said:
You can be an athiest if you want to, I just think that you're wrong. Is that any different from what anyone thinks about people who he disagrees with? No.

Then I would hate to see you when you're not cutting me slack, because then you'd be incredibly rude instead of just really rude.

I'm not whining, I'm asking you to kindly not call me a "fundy". I find it impolite and insulting, so please knock it off. It's not that hard, just be nice. You wouldn't like it if I started calling you names.

Oh stop it!

This is an old and very tired tactic.

The old shout of 'unfair!' when someone disagrees, and then pick at my words.
Thus, avoiding any real debate. I have seen this folly many times before!
It is a different game when the religious person rages with righteous triumph, filled with holy pride.
Then no-one is allowed to deny your so-called wisdom....How tiresome.

Focus on our debate about biblical hoaxes, please and spare us this bickering.

Thank you.

:)
 
Is that one of the Paluxy River "footprints"? I do believe those are a combination of fraud and wishful thinking, and not human prints at all.

Renata
 
Perfection said:
I should have, but I'm lazy.

Of course, you're now just dodging the fact that you can't demonstrate that this is more then a funny-looking rock

No, I'm just being lazy like you. :p

Oh stop it!

This is an old and very tired tactic.

The old shout of 'unfair!' when someone disagrees, and then pick at my words.
Thus, avoiding any real debate. I have seen this folly many times before!
It is a different game when the religious person rages with righteous triumph, filled with holy pride.
Then no-one is allowed to deny your so-called wisdom....How tiresome.

Focus on our debate about biblical hoaxes, please and spare us this bickering.

Thank you.

And you are being impolite by calling me names. I'll drop it when you promise to be polite to me just as I'm being polite to you.

And actually this thread isn't about Biblical hoaxes, it's about man being in Amerca 30,000 years longer than previously thought. Shows what you know, you don't even know the correct topic! :p
 
Elrohir said:
No, I'm just being lazy like you. :p
I'll assume that you're lying and your really can't until you demonstrate otherwise.
 
Renata said:
Is that one of the Paluxy River "footprints"? I do believe those are a combination of fraud and wishful thinking, and not human prints at all.

Renata
Right. They're mis-identified prints of a smaller species of dinosaur. Some have been altered by local residents to impress the "creationist tourists."
 
Perfection said:
I'll assume that you're lying and your really can't until you demonstrate otherwise.

No, actually I'm feeling lazy and am just waiting for the mods to put this thread down or at least tell us to get back on topic. I was going to debate you on the PM system, but you didn't seem interested.
 
Elrohir said:
No, actually I'm feeling lazy and am just waiting for the mods to put this thread down or at least tell us to get back on topic. I was going to debate you on the PM system, but you didn't seem interested.
Feel free to take it to my thread. I just don't debate via PM (no public humiliation of my opponants + no increase in postcounts = no incentive)
 
Perfection said:
Feel free to take it to my thread. I just don't debate via PM (no public humiliation of my opponants + no increase in postcounts = no incentive)

If it's so important, why don't you take it to your thread?

Public humiliation against me? Dream on. :p And quality of posts is much better than quantity.
 
I think this thread was going to cause the creatinist vs. evolutionist debate anyway. So whille all of you are here start it up. ;)

*enjoys reading these debates*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom