Funny Pictures IX: Giggles Galore!
- Thread starter Abaddon
- Start date
- Status
Mise
isle of lucy
that's brilliant
sirtommygunn
Emperor
excellent find! 
Abaddon
Deity
i must admit i found that somehow following a google search for boobs... :/
sirtommygunn
Emperor
simple my dear watson
boobs --> women
women --> men turning into women
boobs --> women
women --> men turning into women
Shylock
Hey smiling strange
One of the ads displayed on this very forum.
The girl in that photo just makes it begging to be photoshopped into something pornographic.
The girl in that photo just makes it begging to be photoshopped into something pornographic.
Narz
keeping it real
What modifications did you have in mind?
Mise
isle of lucy
I can think of two, but one of them would be too low down to be seen on that banner.
Mirc
Not mIRC!!!
One of the ads displayed on this very forum.
The girl in that photo just makes it begging to be photoshopped into something pornographic.
I've seen that on the forum several days ago!
Heretic_Cata
We're gonna live forever
Things happening in the upper part of the banner or to the lower visible part of the banner or to the lower below the banner part.
Narz
keeping it real
Well, if anyone comes up with anything creative please PM me your results. 
DBear
unbeliever
The thing that allways bothered me about this simple equation is that "girls require time and money" translates to Girls = Time + Money. And is an indicator of addition, not multiplication.Teh classic:
ParadigmShifter
Random Nonsense Generator
Not when I did boolean algebra. And was multiplication and or was addition. They are both distributive over each other so it doesn't really matter much, but if you have 0 = false and 1 = true, and have 1+1=1 (a bit of a leap of faith I know), you get the correct rules for boolean algebra.
Not very funny though.
Not very funny though.
ParadigmShifter
Random Nonsense Generator
So here's some maths that I found quite funny...
HOW TO PUT AN ELEPHANT INTO A REFRIGERATOR:
Analysis:
Differentiate it and put into the refrig. Then integrate it in the refrig.
Redefine the measure on the referigerator (or the elephant).
Apply the Banach-Tarsky theorem.
Number theory:
First factorize, second multiply.
Use induction. You can always squeeze a bit more in.
Algebra:
Step 1: Show that the parts of it can be put into the refrig.
Step 2: Show that the refrig. is closed under the addition.
Take the appropriate universal refrigerator and get a surjection from refrigerator to elephant.
Topology:
Have it swallow the refrig. and turn inside out.
Make a refrig. with the Klein bottle.
The elephant is homeomorphic to a smaller elephant.
The elephant is compact, so it can be put into a finite collection of refrigerators. That's usually good enough.
The property of being inside the referigerator is hereditary. So, take the elephant's mother, cremate it, and show that the ashes fit inside the refrigerator.
For those who object to method 5 because it's cruel to animals. Put the elephant's BABY in the refrigerator.
Algebraic topology:
Replace the interior of the refrigerator by its universal cover, R^3.
Linear algebra:
Put just its basis and span it in the refrig.
Show that 1% of the elephant will fit inside the refrigerator. By linearity, x% will fit for any x.
Affine geometry:
There is an affine transformation putting the elephant into the refrigerator.
Set theory:
It's very easy!
refrigerator = { elephant }
The elephant and the interior of the refrigerator both have cardinality c.
Geometry:
Declare the following:
Axiom 1. An elephant can be put into a refrigerator.
Complex analysis:
Put the refrig. at the origin and the elephant outside the unit circle. Then get the image under the inversion.
Numerical analysis:
Put just its trunk and refer the rest to the error term.
Work it out using the Pentium.
Statistics:
Bright statistician. Put its tail as a sample and say "Done."
Dull statistician. Repeat the experiment pushing the elephant to the refrig.
Our NEW study shows that you CAN'T put the elephant in the refrigerator.
HOW TO PUT AN ELEPHANT INTO A REFRIGERATOR:
Analysis:
Differentiate it and put into the refrig. Then integrate it in the refrig.
Redefine the measure on the referigerator (or the elephant).
Apply the Banach-Tarsky theorem.
Number theory:
First factorize, second multiply.
Use induction. You can always squeeze a bit more in.
Algebra:
Step 1: Show that the parts of it can be put into the refrig.
Step 2: Show that the refrig. is closed under the addition.
Take the appropriate universal refrigerator and get a surjection from refrigerator to elephant.
Topology:
Have it swallow the refrig. and turn inside out.
Make a refrig. with the Klein bottle.
The elephant is homeomorphic to a smaller elephant.
The elephant is compact, so it can be put into a finite collection of refrigerators. That's usually good enough.
The property of being inside the referigerator is hereditary. So, take the elephant's mother, cremate it, and show that the ashes fit inside the refrigerator.
For those who object to method 5 because it's cruel to animals. Put the elephant's BABY in the refrigerator.
Algebraic topology:
Replace the interior of the refrigerator by its universal cover, R^3.
Linear algebra:
Put just its basis and span it in the refrig.
Show that 1% of the elephant will fit inside the refrigerator. By linearity, x% will fit for any x.
Affine geometry:
There is an affine transformation putting the elephant into the refrigerator.
Set theory:
It's very easy!
refrigerator = { elephant }
The elephant and the interior of the refrigerator both have cardinality c.
Geometry:
Declare the following:
Axiom 1. An elephant can be put into a refrigerator.
Complex analysis:
Put the refrig. at the origin and the elephant outside the unit circle. Then get the image under the inversion.
Numerical analysis:
Put just its trunk and refer the rest to the error term.
Work it out using the Pentium.
Statistics:
Bright statistician. Put its tail as a sample and say "Done."
Dull statistician. Repeat the experiment pushing the elephant to the refrig.
Our NEW study shows that you CAN'T put the elephant in the refrigerator.
stuge
Emperor
Not necessarily. One can argue that girls require more money as more time passes on, thusly money*time.
azzaman333
meh
Or, girls are a product of time and money!
Pentium
Digital Matter
Thou shalt not use me!
- Status
