No, but if you were to use Moroccan arabic...
No, but if you were to use Moroccan arabic...
Seems like Berber is very unlikely, since there are only so few Berber speakers in the USA. Actually I believe that if Morocco is added to the game, that they would speak Arabic. Berber seems unlikely because of so few speakers and I doubt Firaxis wants to make Moroccan Arabs angry by making their civilization speak Berber rather then Arabic.
But if it were to be the Moors instead of Morocco, then would Berber be more accurate or would Arabic be better?
Nice find Pouakai !
Yeah, I think these might be Carrack and Feitoria as well. Next DLC Portugal and Kongo + Scenario !?![]()
I dunno, if you look at the polls on 2K Kongo are way above Zulu, like, Kongo are in 4th, Zulu 10th. Portugal + Kongo =![]()
I would prefer Kongo over Zulu. I think there's a better argument for a stable, complex civilization. Zulu seem more famous because they fought the British and because of Shaka (I would reject any civ that depends on the personality of a single person - the Huns would fall as well).
Doublepacks would be great (I've been pushing for Carthage and the Celts), but I have a growing fear that Spain and the Inca were more of a fluke. They promised before the launch of the game that there would be a doublepack, so having them together made a lot of sense. Plus, very few other Civs have as clear a connection together as Spain and the Inca (aside from Spain and the Aztecs). While there is an undoubted connection between the Dutch and Indonesians, I don't think it's as readily apparent.
It was. That's fine. I hope nobody reads this thread from front to back because I'll sound really, really repetitive.![]()
Tell me about it...
It sure beats 5 threads a day on DLC civs.