Quackers
The Frog
British PM in charge for 11 years is a..joke?
Wut?
Wut?
British PM in charge for 11 years is a..joke?
Wut?
No, it doesn't say anything meaningful at all.The mere fact that Cheney and Rumsfeld both thought she was less competent than themselves speaks volumes.
So who do you consider to be a leading academic on the geopolitical and military strategy of post-war Czechoslovakia?And calling her a "leading academic" brings dispute to the entire notion of the phrase.
A University Provost is hardly any degree of experience in managing the world's largest economy.
That, in itself, sinks the ship. Heck, that would sink the Presidential ship if Romney decided to pick her.
Creme Irony- The right swaps one of our semi-blacks for one of theirs.
I did not notice any difference to your usual posting style.Why so serious?
Ermm, if running private firms or universities with multi-million pound budgets isn't enough to justify running for President, what is? What job do you need to prepare? Social worker?
It is hardly the first time the Republican Party has deliberately done so. I just wonder why they decided to use someone who clearly has so many skeletons in her closet. Don't they have any other prominent women, white or black for that matter, who haven't already shown they were clearly unfit to assume the presidency?It's an interesting pick to throw out there if you want to play identity politics. I.e. if you think the presidential race is a tic tac to match where you counteract Obama being black and his appeal to women with... *drum roll*... a black woman! Ta-da!
Right... because, according to you, she has no qualifications... unlike, oh, say, Obama, who really had, no qualifications.It is hardly the first time the Republican Party has deliberately done so. I just wonder why they decided to use someone who clearly has so many skeletons in her closet. Don't they have any other prominent women, white or black for that matter, who haven't already shown they were clearly unfit to assume the presidency?