Georgian-Russian War: the Western response

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its the best solution in these cases. Luckily our Russians moved voluntarily because they didnt feel home and were mainly relatives to some soviet general.
 
... people who are being made foreigners in their own country ...
What part of word "occupation" don't you understand? If you shoot the head of a family, deport the rest of family into Siberia and move into their house, does that make this house your own?
... because of their descendants ...
About half of these people are still first generation immigrants, actually. As for the other half - what does it tell about one, if he has been living in Estonia (independent from USSR for 17 years now) for a lifetime and has not bothered to
learn a single word of Estonian language? No - Estonians must speak Russian to them, right? When they are so terribly, terribly oppressed here, why don't they get the f*ck back to where they came from - their homeland, where everything is obviously wonderful?! There is only this tiny piece of land for us. Our ancestors have been living here for 9000 years. I want to live here too, I want my children to live here and I want them to speak their own language. There are vast swaths of Russia for Russians. Why don't they go and live there?

The answer is that majority of them are actually normal people who have no problems with acquiring their citizenship according to current process, i.e showing some respect towards Estonian people. It is Kremlin who speaks on their behalf and complains and complains...and there are some who can not accept that they are not the master-race here any more and therefore go along. But luckily they are not too many.
 
Jesus Christ man! You are the one not answering to most of my posts in other threads. All I said that Russia is different from USSR. From all the logic possible it is true. America is indeed the biggest threat we have and they caused a lot of problems. Poor management and direct treason caused a lot of problems for Russia too. What is it you cannot comprehend?

I'm only discussing with you in one other thread, and I have answered everything there sofar, when I have had time, so you must be mixing me up with someone else.

I can not comprehend how you, a guy I have grown to respect, can have such exagerated ideas about half of the world being your nations enemy.
 
I'm only discussing with you in one other thread, and I have answered everything there sofar, when I have had time, so you must be mixing me up with someone else.

I can not comprehend how you, a guy I have grown to respect, can have such exagerated ideas about half of the world being your nations enemy.
Thanks for the commercial as the American say :) (no pun intended)

It is not half the world, but only the US, UK and allied nations. If they stop their military advancement in EE, cool down the media I could then change my view. So far I've got my reasons for what I am saying.
 
charming... ethnic cleansing still fashionable in central europe them

Not really. There is plenty of Russians here, and they fall into 3 categories:

1) Russian gangsters
2) Russian rich (pretty much the same as the 1st category)
3) Russian dissidents.

I like the third category. I'd like more of them here, because they're the elite of the Russian nation - clever, educated, intelligent, kind. These qualities are obviously not liked by the Kremlin clique.
 
I got my time now.

Russian language is semi-official here. All government websites etc are bilingual.
E.g. this is government portal integrating all ministries, boards, etc...
http://www.eesti.ee/rus/
I am glad this is the case. As I already noted in the other thread the Russian employed at this site is really bad quality (looks like machine translation). I hope it is corrected in the near future.

Info brochures or ads are bilingual anywhere as well. Most newspapers or news portals have Russian editions. The only thing that are very much not bilingual are some local Russians (not majority of them, though, I'd say around 30%). If I want to go to grocery store, I'd better know Russian, or the gals behind counter would often have no idea what I want.
Interesting and party good news too. Here's a joke on the issue from our times:
An ethnic Russian comes to a shop in newly established Estonia and starts to ask for something in really bad Estonian. The Estonian guy says: "do not worry, I know Russian." The Russian then responds: "We listened to your Russian for 50 years, now listen to our Estonian"

Why is it not official? Well, there is ~140 million Russians and ~1 million Estonians. We are, frankly, rightfully worried about Estonian language and culture lasting in a bit longer perspective. Besides, it is, imho, really very basic courtesy to learn to speak language of the country you are living in on some level. Is it really too much to ask for?:rolleyes: If one really doesn't want to learn it - there is huge country were one can speak Russian for one's heart's content right next to us. Not to mention it being his historic homeland.
I understand the issues of a minor language nation in a global world, especially when most of it speaks English. I just want to point out the example of Switzerland, Belgium, Spain and others who have found means to make all minority languages official at some level or the other. Yes, Russians have not been there a long time, but so haven't the Chinese in Taiwan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Taiwan)
This is a similar case and surely Russian can exist peacefully as a national language in neighboring states.

Why should there be free education in some foreign language to begin with?
Because it is not a foreign language! It is a native tongue of 1/4 to 1/3 of the population. In Europe such issues are resolved in favor of minorities.
We are in the middle of gradual reform, where teaching of some subjects in later grades will be in Estonian.
This is what worries me. Both languages should be taught and schools filled by choice. If not both are offered then this violates UN convention on Human Rights.

Also, total number of schools is diminishing as well, due to demographic processes.
This I understand, bad news for Estonia too. :(
Reasons for this reform are the same as above, also I believe this works for better integration of Estonians and Russians.
It does not. It integrates Russians into Estonia by defying them the right to education.

Also, many local Russians welcome the reform as speaking two languages well really gives them edge on local labor market. Many Russian parents start with putting their kids into Estonian kindergartens for that reason on their own initiative. After all, it is imho very possible to learn to speak another language while preserving one's own cultural identity.
Yes, but if the right to education is not respected then the ethnic language becomes threatened. I welcome integration, I am strongly against "conversion".

:confused: Actually, I do not know anything about it. Nor can I imagine hiw could anyone be forced to change his/her name.
Okay.... I do not much about it either. Need to look for more sources.... :S

I consider these peoples remnants of civil occupation, people as they were inhabited here post-WW2 in violation with Geneva Code. (Pre-WW2, there was about 3% of Russians in Estonia - mainly "raskolniks" who had escaped here from religious persecution).
I could agree with you there, but these people WERE citizens of Estonia when the vote on independence was taking place. Legally this means that their right of citizenship was taken away from them with independence taking place. Not a good thing to do IMHO.

That is not to say that these people are or should be deprived of citizenship - it is very possible for them to obtain it (like tens of thousands have done). It is simply not given automatically - they need to pass an exam on constitution and language exam.
Why not make the country bilingual at some level. It would make it a lot easier to pass that exam. I am sure people would be a LOT more willing to learn Estonian if they need to know both languages in order to (re)-gain their citizenship. As I already mentioned, the whole process of "giving them citizenship" is based on them giving up their rights to minority privileges. Why are they without nationality anyway? NOTHING like this ever happened in ex-USSR only in the Baltic states.

Estonia is a national state, why should we have automatically given citizenship to every migrant who decided to come over?
Because these immigrants were citizens whose vote was eligible in 1990 (r was it 1989?). Because Estonians are a kind and good willed people that are willing to forgive and live in peace?


We could not, if we wanted to preserve it.
The fact is that Russians are there weather you want them or not. BY making the process more humane you could avoid considerable trouble.

It seems to me rather, that Russian Federation, as descendant of USSR, should have given Russian citizenship to former citizens of USSR. However, it seems to me that Kremlin chose to exploit them to cause problems here, not actually acting in their best interests.
Russia gave citizenship to former RSFSR citizens to avoid problems with people from other republics. Any Russian who was a citizen of USSR can get a Russian passport IIRC.

Procedure for obtaining Estonian citizenship via naturalization and statistics regarding number of persons naturalized:
http://www.mig.ee/index.php/mg/eng/e...an_citizenship[/quote]
Sorry:
Module not found

The requested module eng could not be found.

Võimalikud põhjused on:

* The module name was misspelled, try changing the URL.
* The module does not exist on this site.
* This site uses siteaccess matching in the URL and you didn't supply one, try inserting a siteaccess name before the module in the URL .


40,000 people is a good number, but it is over 8 years out of a total number of 400,000+ people. The work is done, but very slowly. If the government is indeed interested in solving this "problem" they could find other solutions IMHO.

And on final note, none of these issued can afaik be claimed as deprivation of human rights as such... ;)
http://www.un.org/events/humanrights/udhr60/index.shtml
Articles 2, 6, 15, 21, 23, 26, 27, 29
can be argued to be violated with respect to right to Language and Ethnicity.

From wiki on Estonia it says that:
"[Russian] taught as a compulsory second language during the Soviet era."
Compulsory SECOND language.
Why can't Estonia match Soviet standards? I am not even talking about EU standards.
 
Thanks for the commercial as the American say :) (no pun intended)

It is not half the world, but only the US, UK and allied nations. If they stop their military advancement in EE, cool down the media I could then change my view. So far I've got my reasons for what I am saying.

You see reasons, I see delusions.

It is realy upsetting.
 
You see reasons, I see delusions.

It is realy upsetting.

I've stated the reasons over and over in this forum. if you like... search for them.

You may or may not be right about me. I pray that in 10 or 20 years we could say that I was wrong.
 
If they stop their military advancement in EE, cool down the media I could then change my view.

Sorry, we're gonna stick with a free press over here. Looks like you are just gonna have to be pissed :(

And about that 'military advancement' thing... the US is not the one taking land.

Russia needs to finish its crumbling. Let the last of the KGB die, let the USSR finally pass into history. End rulership by the mob and old-guard reds, become a western democracy I could then change my view.
 
I've stated the reasons over and over in this forum. if you like... search for them.

You may or may not be right about me. I pray that in 10 or 20 years we could say that I was wrong.

Your resons are delusional. At least as "emotional" as you claim Winner's are.
 
Not really. There is plenty of Russians here, and they fall into 3 categories:

1) Russian gangsters
2) Russian rich (pretty much the same as the 1st category)
3) Russian dissidents.

I like the third category. I'd like more of them here, because they're the elite of the Russian nation - clever, educated, intelligent, kind. These qualities are obviously not liked by the Kremlin clique.
Yes, but they came after 1989. I am not quite happy with two categories but they are not danger for state. Other eastern european gangs are not much better.
You forgot about youngsters of rich studying in Prague, in Charles university are there large numbers, they have apartments in centre of Prague. Their fathers live in Russia and are some kind of oligarchs. I was drinking with two russian girls of this kind in their apartment with soviet anthem as background:lol:
 
Your resons are delusional. At least as "emotional" as you claim Winner's are.

I invited you to do the forum search. Do as you please.
 
I understand the issues of a minor language nation in a global world, especially when most of it speaks English. I just want to point out the example of Switzerland, Belgium, Spain and others who have found means to make all minority languages official at some level or the other. Yes, Russians have not been there a long time, but so haven't the Chinese in Taiwan.This is a similar case and surely Russian can exist peacefully as a national language in neighboring states.
Well, it is "official at some level". Our constitution clearly states that if at least half of inhabitants in some local municipality speak some other language, then this language is considered second official language in said municipality. 95% of Russians in Estonia live in Tallinn or North-Eastern part of the country. Local municipalities are all very much bilingual there.
http://www.narva.ee/rus/
http://www.tallinn.ee/rus
Because it is not a foreign language! It is a native tongue of 1/4 to 1/3 of the population. In Europe such issues are resolved in favor of minorities.
Sure, and Estonians are the actual minority. "Russian minority" is but optical illusion. In reality they are just one part of 140million Russian diaspora just the other side of imaginary line.
This is what worries me. Both languages should be taught and schools filled by choice. If not both are offered then this violates UN convention on Human Rights.
And both ARE taught and schools ARE filled by choice. If you are really interested, then this page gives overview about the reform, in Russian. http://www.hm.ee/index.php?249457.
I could agree with you there, but these people WERE citizens of Estonia when the vote on independence was taking place. Legally this means that their right of citizenship was taken away from them with independence taking place. Not a good thing to do IMHO.
What is the big deal about citizenship anyway? If one really wants to become Estonian citizen, to give his share in building and leading this small country of ours, then he certainly would have to know Estonian at least on some level, as well as to know our constitution. If one does not care about neither of these things, why would he want to become Estonian citizen in the first place? To turn it into mini-Russia?
Why not make the country bilingual at some level.
As demonstrated above, we are pretty bilingual imho.
I am sure people would be a LOT more willing to learn Estonian if they need to know both languages in order to (re)-gain their citizenship.
But that is how it works now, doesn't it?
As I already mentioned, the whole process of "giving them citizenship" is based on them giving up their rights to minority privileges.
Exactly what kind of minority privileges and how are they "giving up"?:confused: They can still go to Russian schools. They can still get info in Russian. They can still drink their tea from samovar, vodka from teaglass and play karmoshka. The only thing they lose is ability to go to Russia without visa. (Imho this is one of the main reasons why many have opted not to take Estonian citizenship, and as you can see the reason lies in Russia).
Because these immigrants were citizens whose vote was eligible in 1990 (r was it 1989?). Because Estonians are a kind and good willed people that are willing to forgive and live in peace?
Some additional good will from their part would not go amiss either. I'd say we've come half way. But that is of course always debatable.
Why are they without nationality anyway? NOTHING like this ever happened in ex-USSR only in the Baltic states.
Because USSR ceased to be and ESSR was never legal entity and left no legal descendant either. It happened only here because Baltics became part of USSR under unique conditions. Plus, afaik Russian minority was simply largely pogrommed out of Central Asian republics weren't they? How come I never hear complaints about that?
Module not found
Apparently part of address somehow got substituted with punctuation...
http://www.mig.ee/index.php/mg/rus/grazhdanstvo_estonii/hodatajstvo_o_grazhdanstve_estonii
Maybe that'll work.
40,000 people is a good number, but it is over 8 years out of a total number of 400,000+ people. The work is done, but very slowly. If the government is indeed interested in solving this "problem" they could find other solutions IMHO.
If you look at the table below you can see that it is a total of ~150 000 since 1992.
http://www.un.org/events/humanrights/udhr60/index.shtml
Articles 2, 6, 15, 21, 23, 26, 27, 29
can be argued to be violated with respect to right to Language and Ethnicity.
... but in view of above, this argument would hardly hold...
From wiki on Estonia it says that:
"[Russian] taught as a compulsory second language during the Soviet era."
Compulsory SECOND language.
Why can't Estonia match Soviet standards? I am not even talking about EU standards.
I am not sure I follow you. Russian is taught is schools to that day.
 
It does not. It integrates Russians into Estonia by defying them the right to education.
Yes, but if the right to education is not respected then the ethnic language becomes threatened. I welcome integration, I am strongly against "conversion".

Sorry, missed that for the first time. Are you really sincerely afraid that we could "convert" such a large number of ethnic Russians living so close to their original diaspora to the effect that "their language becomes threatened"?
How do you think it has been possible for some of them to live independent Estonia for nearly 20 years without speaking the native language?
The answer is they never really needed it. The country IS bilingual to the extent that they could all manage perfectly well without it, effectively forcing everybody else to communicate in Russian with them. But if these people want to become citizens of Estonia they should express some degree goodwill and loyalty to Estonian state - e.g by overcoming this ignorance towards original population. Nobody forbids them to speak Russian amongst themselves or go to Russian schools or to see Russian plays or whatever else.

And again, large number of them does not see the problem. I have good number of Russian friends and colleagues, who speak fluent Estonian and are not less Russians for that. My own wife is half Belorussian. My brother-in-law is Ukrainian. Believe me, it is mostly just Kremlin who tries to show things much worse than they actually are, in hopes to destabilize the situation here and create negative PR for Baltics.
 
Interesting article in "Independent". British correspondent interviewed Georgian people in border city Tkviavi:
Passing along the road to Tkviavi, the lush green fields, bountiful orchards and gentle slopes of the Caucasus foothills give off the air of a sleepy rural paradise. But the scorched earth and burnt-out shells of cars that litter the roadside are clues that all is not right here, and the silence gripping the town that two weeks ago had a population of 1,300 is eerie.
Tkviavi is the closest town inside Georgia "proper" to the border with South Ossetia and its capital, Tskhinvali. Its residents watched as Georgian troops poured up the road three weeks ago in their ill-fated push to regain South Ossetia, and they watched as the army fled, leaving their village undefended. Along with them went the young of the town, scared of counter-attacks. Only the elderly and sick remained.
Then, on 12 August, Russian jets bombed the village, destroying dozens of homes. For a week afterwards, the feared maradyori – marauding gangs of South Ossetians and other irregular militias – surged down the road from Tskhinvali in an orgy of looting, torching and killing.
Now, its people are stuck in limbo. The Russians have established a checkpoint further down the road at Karaleti, preventing those who fled from returning to help their elderly relatives.
But while there was initial fury among the residents at the "Ossetian dogs" who had robbed and trashed their homes, now the target of the anger in Tkviavi seems to be changing. There is a corresponding backlash against President Mikheil Saakashvili, for bring misfortune upon them.
"Please tell everyone in Russia, in the world, that we want to be with Russia, we don't want Saakashvili. He has brought us nothing but trouble," implored Karaman Goguashvili, 77. "We don't need Nato, we don't need America, we need to be friends with Russia."
When asked if they agreed with this, the other villagers in the group nodded vigorously. "We're all people who have been through a lot in our lives, we're not easily scared," added Mr Goguashvili, pointing out the garden where he and his wife hid during the looting raids. "But now we are all scared. Many people have died here. Who will defend us? Who will look after us? We are left here all alone."

In one area at the edge of the town, some houses are razed. Debris and twisted bits of metal litter the ground. A large group of villagers showed us round their destroyed houses, each one recounting a tale more pitiful than the last.
Inside another house that had only light bomb damage, two elderly men sat in stained white vests. They sat in silence, their hands clutching a rail in front of them and shaking uncontrollably. When questioned, neither man even registered the question or the presence of a stranger in the house. They simply continued staring at the wall, their scrawny hands quivering. "He's been like this ever since the bombings," wailed the distraught wife of one. "We don't know what to do. We need medicines, doctors. But nothing is coming."
The Russian bombing attacks on Georgia have mostly targeted military infrastructure, and where they have missed, such as in Gori, there were obvious military targets nearby. But there is nothing of military importance in this village, and the bombing raids came days after the Georgian army had fled.
One shopkeeper said he had only voted for Mr Saakashvili because government officials told him his shop would be closed down if he did not. "Russia protected Georgia for hundreds of years; we've always been close to Russia," said another resident. "The Ossetians behaved like dogs, but if Russia is our friend, then the Ossetians will be our friends, too."
There were more nods of agreement. "We are just simple people, we are peasants," rejoined Mr Goguashvili. "Perhaps all the intellectuals in Tbilisi who want to be with America are far cleverer than us; perhaps they understand the world better than we do. But we are the ones left here who have to live with this," he said, with a mournful gesture towards the wreckage behind him.
 
Interesting indeed...only I would have bolded other parts:

...Then, on 12 August, Russian jets bombed the village, destroying dozens of homes. For a week afterwards, the feared maradyori – marauding gangs of South Ossetians and other irregular militias – surged down the road from Tskhinvali in an orgy of looting, torching and killing.
Now, its people are stuck in limbo. The Russians have established a checkpoint further down the road at Karaleti, preventing those who fled from returning to help their elderly relatives.
But while there was initial fury among the residents at the "Ossetian dogs" who had robbed and trashed their homes
...
...But there is nothing of military importance in this village, and the bombing raids came days after the Georgian army had fled. ...

So you've managed to bomb some poor peasants into submission. They are willing to choose their own life over integrity of their country. Wow. How proud you must feel right now. :pat:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom