EDIT: Better censoring
Funniest Webcomics
- Thread starter cardgame
- Start date
EDIT: Better censoring
"[a] vitriolic and bitter collection of unwarranted nastiness about a silly and harmless comic."
SS-18 ICBM
Oscillator
Unfortunately I feel that this is true.xkcdsucks said:
Funniest webcomic for me would be...pretty much everything at Nuklear Power. Especially 8-bit theater.
Mise
isle of lucy
I only read this one: http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2009/08/comic-628-i-predict-this-comic-sucks-i.html
But it was the most ******** thing I've ever read in the whole freaking history of the internets. The guy who wrote it clearly doesn't know a sodding thing about maths, and is actually pretty dumb himself. It does not surprise me one iota that he doesn't find the comic funny.
That being said, of course XKCD has deteriorated over the years - all things do. It's not as good as it used to be - maybe 1 in 7 are lolworthy now, rather than 2 in 3 in the early days. But it's still better than you.
But it was the most ******** thing I've ever read in the whole freaking history of the internets. The guy who wrote it clearly doesn't know a sodding thing about maths, and is actually pretty dumb himself. It does not surprise me one iota that he doesn't find the comic funny.
That being said, of course XKCD has deteriorated over the years - all things do. It's not as good as it used to be - maybe 1 in 7 are lolworthy now, rather than 2 in 3 in the early days. But it's still better than you.
Catharsis
catch u on the flip scythe
To be fair, that's not the regular blogger. But yes, his objections to that particular comic are rather odd.
Probably the best way to read XKCDsucks is to wait for a particularly awful comic, and then read the review of that. I don't know, to be honest, because I stopped reading XKCD a long time ago, because of how bad it is. But if Randall just posts a mediocre comic then Carl will just pick at little irritating minutiae, which isn't much fun to read. (If he posts a good comic then Carl will generally say 'this one's actually quite good' and then all the somewhat dim reactionary commenters, one of which I used to be, will just pour scorn on it anyway. Although I was still clinging on to the last vestiges of XKCD-fandom at the time, so I hold that I was not one of the reactionary ones.
) It's only when the comic allows the blog to go into full-on 'vitriolic and bitter' mode that it's worth reading, usually.Check out his angriest rants on the left. Those are the good ones.
Mise
isle of lucy
Okay, yeah, some of those were pretty funny. 
SS-18 ICBM
Oscillator
mitsho
Deity
Can someone explain to me why these comics result in so much outrage in the US? It's just "naked kids". I don't understand. I don't find them particularly hilarious and technically they're not actually webcomics, but I wanted to ask the question and I didn't feel like opening up a new thread. So:
What's so particularly destroyable of the Morale, Ethics and Culture in these comics?
SS-18 ICBM
Oscillator
Why are they naked? 
DroopyTofu
Double Bass Double Bass
Is it my imgaination, or do they look like younger versions of some of the characters from the comic "Zits"?
bigdog5994
Lady Day
those are kids?
mitsho
Deity
"Love is" is a seventies or eighties "comic" which was wildly succesfull and overly romantic:
http://www.gocomics.com/loveis
Yes, it's actually from the zits comic
(http://www.arcamax.com/zits)
http://www.gocomics.com/loveis
DroopyTofu said:
Yes, it's actually from the zits comic
(http://www.arcamax.com/zits)
Ziggy Stardust
Absolutely Sane
Agarwaen
King
Ziggy Stardust
Absolutely Sane
Similar threads
