Few random things:
1) I'm playing for a culture win, standard map, king. It's well into the mid 400s and I still have not won, I'm having trouble with Spain and Sweeden. I still haven't discovered stealth bombers...now since this was culture not science, I did not until far far later choose any rationalism policies.
I did tradition>aethtics then choose a few mix of exploration/patronage than ideology and only then back to rationalism.
I'm wondering if this was my mistake....if you should ALWAYS take rationalsim as soon as you finish tradition or it is available.
2) Is Sweeden always a warmongering pain in the ass bully? I would have warred with him sooner but I did not want it strain my resources, so instead he took over one Civ (Iceland) on his continent, settled on the west side of my continent and took over most of Russia.
Again, I stayed out of it as my miliatary is 3rd best and wanted to focus on other things. Mistake?
1) I'm playing for a culture win, standard map, king. It's well into the mid 400s and I still have not won, I'm having trouble with Spain and Sweeden. I still haven't discovered stealth bombers...now since this was culture not science, I did not until far far later choose any rationalism policies.
I did tradition>aethtics then choose a few mix of exploration/patronage than ideology and only then back to rationalism.
I'm wondering if this was my mistake....if you should ALWAYS take rationalsim as soon as you finish tradition or it is available.
2) Is Sweeden always a warmongering pain in the ass bully? I would have warred with him sooner but I did not want it strain my resources, so instead he took over one Civ (Iceland) on his continent, settled on the west side of my continent and took over most of Russia.
Again, I stayed out of it as my miliatary is 3rd best and wanted to focus on other things. Mistake?