News *might be* on the way - Follow-up Fall Patch coming soon (definitely)
- Thread starter Gucumatz
- Start date
- Status
Oh, certainly. I think (?) they made money on previous DLC, and apart from that Wonders of the World DLC, I think they've all been pretty well received. The "no-DLC-ever" faction doesn't really have a leg to stand on anymore, and quite a few people enjoy new civs. I, personally, would LOVE to have them add the Zulu.
Since 2K owns the IP, I'd say this might not be unlikely. At least it would be an utter waste of money not to try something like that.
Preemptively: I don't know anything, pure guessing from my side.
And...:
...I absolutely agree with this.
Sherlock
Just one more turn...
Agree 100%, but I doubt it will happen
Peng Qi
Emperor
Uh, why?
Gamewizard
Emperor
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 1,234
Cause people don't like getting their hands dirty.
Peng Qi
Emperor
I guess I don't understand why people who never want anyone to declare war on them ever don't just boot up the game with no opponents or something.
I dont understand how you jumped to that conclusion from " I pray that they fix the "must kill, pillage and destroy at all costs" aspect of the post fall patch AI."
I hope when I have 16,000 posts I still believe in civ.
Camikaze dude that is a lot of posts.
I know I feel like a noob when I look at all those posts. Do you know one time I got in trouble for mentioning posts. I may get in trouble this time.
I hope not though.Anyone still having major issues with the patch? I have been lucky no issues, no crashes. Fast turn times. I am impressed.
Sir Furlong
Chieftain
I haven't had any issues, I'm pleased with it thus far.
gunslinger6792
Warlord
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2012
- Messages
- 282
perhaps ill get a fix to the constent problem of the game being unable to keep 2 files in the verify game cache tap. a boy can dream atleast.
BlueSignofDeath
Chieftain
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Messages
- 32
Peng Qi : Some people play civ games for something more than a war game. Some of us want to create a civilization from scratch, interacting with other civs, creating meaningful alliances, trade and occasionally going to war with others.... not constant warfare with the rest as minor aspects in between the nuclear missiles. If I wanted to play a war game, I'd be playing games like Starcraft, Warcraft, Command and Conquer or Warhammer, not a civilization title.
Peng Qi
Emperor
Because war is about killing, pillaging, and destroying? So I assumed they didn't like war. That or they don't like good AI. It's one of those two things.
I mean, that would be a wonderful fantasy game, but real life is not and has never been an idyllic place where superpowers coexist peacefully over long periods of time. Human history has been one long war interspersed with moments of peace, not vice versa.
Deaths Advocate
Prince
I hope when I have 16,000 posts I still believe in civ.
The top dudes have like 40,000!!!!
Or like to play competitive games.
I hvaen't seen a civ game where you could not do that, including post-patch (as evident in my games on immortal). But I would still argue strongly that the heart of Civ5 is a wargame (given the hex-based payout, 1upt and many wargaming rules). That doesn't mean you must always be engaged in war but you must always prepare for it and be ready to take advantage of situations. While one can choose to turtle, I very much want Firaxis not to spend any time catering to the SimCity crowd but significantly improve the AI: making them better and smarter at winning (beating you) and to move/engage units better on land and seas for the next version. They have a great foundation (finally) to make that happen, if they ignore those that are calling to turn this into a city-building game.
fuzzatron717
Holy Warrior
Thats not true i've gone whole games with no war.
- Status
Similar threads
