It's a minor fix is what I meant.
"Inner."
Cause this way you can steal some extra cash or prestige when you're destroying their sovereignty.
Europa Universalis IV
- Thread starter MoreEpicThanYou
- Start date
Cause this way you can steal some extra cash or prestige when you're destroying their sovereignty.
Lohrenswald
世界的 bottom ranked physicist
So what's the deal with Burgundy not owning most of the netherlands/belgium?
I hate this
I hate this
grandad1982
Deity
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 2,552
The main thing I'm concerned about is locking the movement between provinces at 50%. It seems like it's as bad an idea as the changes to mil access.
They have PUs over their former territories, so I guess they'll have more troops but basically no diplo points and terrible centralization.
Lohrenswald
世界的 bottom ranked physicist
I haven't followed this very closely, but I dislike most of the changes (like apparantly there's new province improvements, but there already were buildings so what's the deal with that?)
If nothing else, I would want a full Burgundy for that event where it's split.
If nothing else, I would want a full Burgundy for that event where it's split.
JohannaK
Heroically Clueless
The big difference concerning province improvements is that provinces have building slots. You cannot build all of the buildings in every province any more. They also don't cost monarch power but are mighty expensive. And forts have a Zone of Control. So exciting!
Lohrenswald
世界的 bottom ranked physicist
Civ'ed
I ain't gotta explain a thing
instead of every province having a fort, only a few have. They determine whether you can keep control over other provinces.
Lohrenswald
世界的 bottom ranked physicist
That sounds absolutely awful
True. If you don't like it, go to the Betas tab, and switch to the beta of whichever version you like best. Paradox has done a good job of making sure you can stay on previous version if you prefer, whether it's because you aren't a fan of a recent change, or just want to finish a game on the version it started on. I use it for the latter purpose regularly, and probably will with my current games-in-progress as well. You can go back as far as 1.4, which IIRC is when Conquest of Paradise was released.
Lohrenswald
世界的 bottom ranked physicist
Betas tab?
And if you can't go back further than conquest of paradise, I'm scheptical this will be valid for long
And if you can't go back further than conquest of paradise, I'm scheptical this will be valid for long
I'm a little puzzled about your attitude. The ability to rollback to previous versions was most likely added with that expansion which is why you can't go further back. There doesn't seem to be an obvious reason why they would remove it.
Also in your previous posts you just say bad, bad, awful without giving any explaination of why you don't like the changes which isn't really helpful for any kind of discussion. Its a bit like the other poster who complains every couple of months about paying for expansions.
Also in your previous posts you just say bad, bad, awful without giving any explaination of why you don't like the changes which isn't really helpful for any kind of discussion. Its a bit like the other poster who complains every couple of months about paying for expansions.
Wolfbeckett
Jerkin' and nonsense.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,682
Well I managed to get my Chrysanthemum Throne and Kirihorsehockyan Japan achievements that I was working on before the patch ruined my save, so I'm now fully ready for this patch. Bring on the better province improvement system!
PhroX
Deity
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2009
- Messages
- 2,680
Starting with territory under vassals/PUs is a buff in the short term due to the significantly larger armies available to you, and while in the long term, the it might be a nerf, you should be able to take advantage of that better start to snowball into a stronger long term position.
It's France that's gettting nerfed, not Burgundy....
(caveat: assuming that other mechanics don't significantly change)
grandad1982
Deity
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 2,552
Wolfbeckett
Jerkin' and nonsense.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,682
I don't know about that. I watched the first several episodes of Arumba's first go at this expansion and he wrecked Burgandy pretty good as England. He had to peace out fairly quickly due to an unlucky sequence of events where he got a PU with an Irish minor right away and Austria declared war to dispute it, but if he hadn't gotten attacked by Austria he could have dismantled Burgundy right at the start of the game. I'll need to play it myself to really know for sure but my initial impression is that Burgundy is incredibly fragile now.
Lohrenswald
世界的 bottom ranked physicist
Well honestly I can ses nothing positive about these changes. They just seem like they will be nuiscanses (except the thing about buildings not costing monarch points (although come to think of it, I would like monarch points just to be removed from the game entierly))
And I had never heard anything about being able to uninstall patches (that are automatically downloaded) untill now
Also sorry for my horrible spelling
Similar threads
