digitCruncher
Emperor
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
- Messages
- 1,012
Im not 100% sure that this is the right place, but...
I am planning on posting about 4 games over the course of the year, in order to get one of my new years resolution "Get back to Civ IV, and win a game on the level above noble. I think its called Prince. Oh, and do it with no help whatsoever.".
Anyway, that doesn't seem too bad. Except that in my 10 games I have played Noble, I have been above the 50% mark ONCE. So, I am a HUGE noob, and I have a long way to go to win in Prince.
Here is the game data:
Civ: HRE (Yay for the overpowered medieval UU)
Size: Huge
Map: Pangea
Difficulty: Noble
Speed: Epic
Gameplay changes: Not much. I plan to stop every 20 turns (maybe 30?) and give an update about whats happening. Every day without fail. However, I have made one tiny gameplay mod: Global Warming (which should actually be nuclear winter) produces TUNDRA, not DESERT, so you can build improvements on a nuclear wasteland (if they are riverside), and they also provide a tiny amount of food and commerce.
If there is anything I need to know, or any recommendations (for example, the number of turns between updates...) please tell me. I start tommorow, but the first 1 or 2 days will just be popping goody huts, and learning the lay of the land... so that gives us 3 days to discuss what I should do in this thread.
A few questions:
* Is 20 turns too short?
* Is this the right forum? There will be a tiny storyline, but I don't think (on the days that I am working) I will be able to make a good story. On the days I don't work, the story will be much richer (comparitively)
* Is this the easiest setting (I want an easy noble game, and work on to a hard noble game by June. My first Prince game will be in July, and I should get to get my resolution by then, if I stay on course)
* Do you guys need any more info?
A few things about my gameplay:
* Leader traits? What are they? I judge a civilisation ENTIRELY by its UU and UB... so thus I choose the HRE with its fast expansion and its overpowered UU. The only trait I care about is charasmatic, as I LURVE the quick promotions and the extra , as I always run out of in the early game.
* I build up an economy until the medieval era, and then attack. Thus a medieval UU is paramount. However, I have a problem with specilisation, IE. I label cities "Production city", "Money city" etc., but when I start losing money, I have a nasty habit of spamming markets in EVERY city. I know I shouldn't, but I do it none-the-less
* I suck at attacking. I do it too late, and very unstategically. I can't raid resources to save myself, and my SoD are small (compared to some people) (although quite balanced). HOWEVER, while defending, I shine, and can defend against people with twice the power rating with ease (IE. Not losing a city)... in vanilla.
* I have a problem. If I found a religion, I can't spread it effectively, and I have huge diplo problems later on. If I don't, none of my neighbors do, and I get huge later on. Thus, Pangaea FTW!! (But when I move to continents, or, god-forbid, archipelago, I am screwed.
* Naval war is very poor for me. I can defend OK, but I seem to lag unusually. (Huge tech lead, but still...) Some people say that the AI spams caravels when the human player attacks with privateers. I can't confirm that, as as soon as I get privateers, the AI has friggin AIRSHIPS!!! And when I just get ironclads, they have (bee-lined) for destroyers, ON A PANGAEA MAP. Its crazy, and I just hope it doesn't happen for me...
* I don't know how I do in the modern era in noble. I haven't thought it worthwhile to continue. I did have one game I nudged into the the modern era, and I tried to rule the skies, but when someone got a huge spaceship lead, I gave up. On Warlord difficulty I spam fighters in every city, then I get bombers and tanks. If I survive this game, I will exchange tanks for paratroopers, unless people say thats a bad idea.
I am planning on winning via a conquest/diplo/domination win. I will crush all people by my mighty landshknelts, and then vassalise everyone. I will get one (or two) good friends, wipe out my nearest neighbour so that I can rapidly expand, bee-line code of laws (but not adopt Taoism (??)), and then crush all people who aren't friends with my friend(s)
Good idea? Wrong forum? I hope that I get feedback within the next 10 hours, while I am sleeping.
I am planning on posting about 4 games over the course of the year, in order to get one of my new years resolution "Get back to Civ IV, and win a game on the level above noble. I think its called Prince. Oh, and do it with no help whatsoever.".
Anyway, that doesn't seem too bad. Except that in my 10 games I have played Noble, I have been above the 50% mark ONCE. So, I am a HUGE noob, and I have a long way to go to win in Prince.
Here is the game data:
Civ: HRE (Yay for the overpowered medieval UU)
Size: Huge
Map: Pangea
Difficulty: Noble
Speed: Epic
Gameplay changes: Not much. I plan to stop every 20 turns (maybe 30?) and give an update about whats happening. Every day without fail. However, I have made one tiny gameplay mod: Global Warming (which should actually be nuclear winter) produces TUNDRA, not DESERT, so you can build improvements on a nuclear wasteland (if they are riverside), and they also provide a tiny amount of food and commerce.
If there is anything I need to know, or any recommendations (for example, the number of turns between updates...) please tell me. I start tommorow, but the first 1 or 2 days will just be popping goody huts, and learning the lay of the land... so that gives us 3 days to discuss what I should do in this thread.
A few questions:
* Is 20 turns too short?
* Is this the right forum? There will be a tiny storyline, but I don't think (on the days that I am working) I will be able to make a good story. On the days I don't work, the story will be much richer (comparitively)
* Is this the easiest setting (I want an easy noble game, and work on to a hard noble game by June. My first Prince game will be in July, and I should get to get my resolution by then, if I stay on course)
* Do you guys need any more info?
A few things about my gameplay:
* Leader traits? What are they? I judge a civilisation ENTIRELY by its UU and UB... so thus I choose the HRE with its fast expansion and its overpowered UU. The only trait I care about is charasmatic, as I LURVE the quick promotions and the extra , as I always run out of in the early game.
* I build up an economy until the medieval era, and then attack. Thus a medieval UU is paramount. However, I have a problem with specilisation, IE. I label cities "Production city", "Money city" etc., but when I start losing money, I have a nasty habit of spamming markets in EVERY city. I know I shouldn't, but I do it none-the-less
* I suck at attacking. I do it too late, and very unstategically. I can't raid resources to save myself, and my SoD are small (compared to some people) (although quite balanced). HOWEVER, while defending, I shine, and can defend against people with twice the power rating with ease (IE. Not losing a city)... in vanilla.
* I have a problem. If I found a religion, I can't spread it effectively, and I have huge diplo problems later on. If I don't, none of my neighbors do, and I get huge later on. Thus, Pangaea FTW!! (But when I move to continents, or, god-forbid, archipelago, I am screwed.
* Naval war is very poor for me. I can defend OK, but I seem to lag unusually. (Huge tech lead, but still...) Some people say that the AI spams caravels when the human player attacks with privateers. I can't confirm that, as as soon as I get privateers, the AI has friggin AIRSHIPS!!! And when I just get ironclads, they have (bee-lined) for destroyers, ON A PANGAEA MAP. Its crazy, and I just hope it doesn't happen for me...
* I don't know how I do in the modern era in noble. I haven't thought it worthwhile to continue. I did have one game I nudged into the the modern era, and I tried to rule the skies, but when someone got a huge spaceship lead, I gave up. On Warlord difficulty I spam fighters in every city, then I get bombers and tanks. If I survive this game, I will exchange tanks for paratroopers, unless people say thats a bad idea.
I am planning on winning via a conquest/diplo/domination win. I will crush all people by my mighty landshknelts, and then vassalise everyone. I will get one (or two) good friends, wipe out my nearest neighbour so that I can rapidly expand, bee-line code of laws (but not adopt Taoism (??)), and then crush all people who aren't friends with my friend(s)
Good idea? Wrong forum? I hope that I get feedback within the next 10 hours, while I am sleeping.