planetfall
Emperor
It used to seem obvious, as your city/civ expanded, you owned more and more tiles.
It also seemed obvious that when city A from civA and city B from CivB had tile X within 2 tiles of their city center, then tile X would be owned by the civ with the highest culture for their city.
However, although the above is true. I have observered a few strange anomies to the above assumptions:
1. a new city will often push out it's range over an established city,
2. a city with 5 culture/turn and newer will start displacing tiles from a city with over 100 culture.
Has there ever been any discussion of this? Is there a known formula for resolving who owns tile X?
PF
It also seemed obvious that when city A from civA and city B from CivB had tile X within 2 tiles of their city center, then tile X would be owned by the civ with the highest culture for their city.
However, although the above is true. I have observered a few strange anomies to the above assumptions:
1. a new city will often push out it's range over an established city,
2. a city with 5 culture/turn and newer will start displacing tiles from a city with over 100 culture.
Has there ever been any discussion of this? Is there a known formula for resolving who owns tile X?
PF