killmeplease
Mk Z on Steam
they can give a 'civilization' name to whatever they like, cornflakes for example. its their right. and it would not be their falut if people like you didnt find espionage and religion in the flakes.
they can give a 'civilization' name to whatever they like, cornflakes for example. its their right. and it would not be their falut if people like you didnt find espionage and religion in the flakes.
Ah so ### the consumer.. is the name of the game? Least your honest.. unlike firaxis.
im a consumer too and i wasnt ### so its not likely.
your disappointment have no direct connection to the game itself, as i've written above.
How so.. you said my expecting things that was in the previous version is somehow unacceptable.
Please explain your logic in that a sequel doesn't have to contain anything to do with the previous version in a series.
its likely would contain things from previous versions, in their general form, what we have with civ5 actually (cities units civs techs etc all these things we have). if not - people would be disappointed. if we would sell A under the name of B2 people that liked B and arent fond of A-like things would be disappointed and it would be a marketing fail as A-likers would not buy B2 thinking that its not A, and B likers would make bad reviews putting other B-likers out of B2. Which is not the case of Civ5, as everyone of Civ4 fans knew that theres no religions and espionage in the game, long before the release.
The AI is sophisticated (and nasty) enough to plan a betrayal 15 turns in advance. And you can use your spies to find this out.
In the early ages, religion will be one of the crucial factors in how other civilizations respond to you. Later in the game, those religious prejudices will give way to ideology preferences.
great people, customizable civics, unit experience and promotions.Name ONE system in civ V that was kept from Civ IV. Name One...
great people, customizable civics, unti experience and promotions.
So that makes it okay to release games that are broken and then charge for the fixes???People need to chill if we have to have mods actions now.
This is suppose to be a fun game, not a realistic super detaled game, if that was it every turn should equal to one day and then THAT woudl take ages -.-
I'm just happy they are putting more flavour into the game so Hotseat games will actually be exciting for once. I'm happy they haven't screweded us over with little civs instead, we're getting NINE new ones.
I understand people's concern with "balancing" and the fact that Civ 5 was "broken" when it was released, but so was Sims 3, everyday now, the most commercialized games are usually not taken care properly.. mostly by EA Games, I don't play the others but I'm sure there were some issues with Skyrim and stuff.
Having Civilization 4.5 instead of Civilization 5.5 would be quite disappointing. I'll be glad to be mistaken.
but its nice you ignored the rest of my post... it proves its true.
again you ignored half my post.. the systems you quoted as kept were all modified greatly so were not kept. Are you purposely being disingenuous?theres just nothing new, i responded to that earlier
the systems you quoted as kept were all modified greatly so were not kept.
i dont think so, i thought it can be concluded from the conversation, as i mentioned those systems as kept.
- Reworked Combat System. The expansion has a reworked combat system along with an AI that places more emphasis on balanced army composition. Among the changes to the combat system is the addition of melee naval units, which will force you to really rethink the way you execute your naval assaults.
- Enhanced Diplomacy, with Espionage. In addition to being able to establish embassies with your rival civilizations, spies will now be an important part of how you conduct your foreign affairs. Surveilling foreign cities, stealing advanced techs, and garnering influence with city-states are some of the things you'll be able to do with this new powerful mechanic.
HahahaMaybe "of Gods, Spies, and minor unit tweaks" didn't have quite the same ring? LOL
What about Numidia? Masinissa or Jugurtha as leader? True, they didn't have a vast empire, but the Numidian cavalry was 'world renowned' in western Europe.I recommended the Moors and Kongo as alternatives.