Number of Civ Opponents to Play With
- Thread starter Chieftess
- Start date
Provolution
Sage of Quatronia
Please transfer this to poll section Moderator
None is not an option. 
Provolution
Sage of Quatronia
Well, we could win on walkover 
Provolution
Sage of Quatronia
LOL @ Nobody, None
Donovan Zoi
The Return
Can't we mod the game to have more than 12 civs total? Although that may be a nightmare in the tech department, it gives us more trade options too.
Oh well, 11 it is.
EDIT: Way to go, Civanator! It seems you were the only other person to read the poll correctly, as it asks how many opponents should be in the game. Looks like we will have to mod the game after all.
Oh well, 11 it is.
EDIT: Way to go, Civanator! It seems you were the only other person to read the poll correctly, as it asks how many opponents should be in the game. Looks like we will have to mod the game after all.
Nobody
Gangster
It will still take us 3 months to play the demogame
Sarevok
Civ3 Scenario Creator
12, it means more fun for us militarists 
thescaryworker
Builder
11, <you wonder why people haven't gotten the fact that you can only have 11 opponents on Large>
Ooops 
thescaryworker is right - I thought of 12 civs total on a large map, so I voted for that. Please change my vote (and probably other's too, since they meant the same thing) to 11.
thescaryworker is right - I thought of 12 civs total on a large map, so I voted for that. Please change my vote (and probably other's too, since they meant the same thing) to 11.
RegentMan
Deity
Yup, I meant the maximum amount too. Twelve civs total.
Provolution
Sage of Quatronia
Well, we all meant 12 civs in total , big deal, are we going to have anal people jumping up and down again. Poll had a little flaw, but we got the point, max civs.
Donovan Zoi
The Return
No one's jumping up and down, Provo; just showing that we know how to read and interpret instructions and you don't. 
It's oversights like this that make me wonder if this game is worth all the trouble, because there will be future polls that will be more confusing than this one should have been.
A non-issue for sure, though. But 16 people??!
It's oversights like this that make me wonder if this game is worth all the trouble, because there will be future polls that will be more confusing than this one should have been.A non-issue for sure, though. But 16 people??!
thescaryworker
Builder
How about all 12 and 11 votes count toward the same thing: maximum ai opponents. (thats what we all wanted, right?)
EDIT: err... you can't exactly have a random number of civs, can you?
EDIT: err... you can't exactly have a random number of civs, can you?
Stuck_as_a_Mac
Aptenodytes forsteri
I second that. A lot of us can be stupid when reading polls... myself included.
Lets just assume that teh 12/11 majority means max # opponents on large
Lets just assume that teh 12/11 majority means max # opponents on large
