rcoutme said:btw, If we had a settler with our galleys and burned Fortaleeza after moving into the lake with a settler, they would be forced to build a city (and then move a fleet there) where Fortaleeza was in order to capture our last settler. This would follow the 'dishonorable' course but would be a fun way to frustrate the buggers until they figured out what to do...If there are two people left in Fortaleeza, you could disband units (especially galleys) to obtain sufficient shields to follow this program :suicide: This will be the last suggestions of the CoMA as I will do a banzai charge at Fortaleeza and do not expect to survive...you will then have to replace me with someone else I guess, as dead men tell no tales.
See the discussion from Post #41 down in this thread
The suggestion is to capture Fortaleze and if that city has a pop of 2 or bigger to rush a settler by disbanding units (galeys). That settler will be put into a galley and sailed into the lake. Then Fortaleze will be abandoned.
The galley with settler can't be sunk without building a new city and even then it will be hard.
See current Fortaleze here in the previous turn thread.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=86323&stc=1
I coul not agree with you on the issue. If we are reduced to doing such rediculious things, then it seems that this team is not worthy to be part of any Mutli-site Democracy game.
Noone should ever be proud of being a New Zealander. 
