North American Treaty Organisation NATO (silvers nes)

Sheep

Sheep

Orange Shrooms!
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
10,496
Location
Edited so Moose cant find me
DEMOCRATIC INTERNATIONAL TREATY ORGANISATION

250px-Flag_of_NATO.jpg

Flag of the Democratic International Treaty Organisation

Charter of the Democratic Internaional Treaty Organisation

Article I​


The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them throughout the world shall be considered an attack against them all. Consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North and Central American region.

Article II​

The Headquaters of the Democratic International Treaty Organisation shall be held in the city of Toronto, in the Confederacy of Canada. There shall be several sub HQs in important locations around the world.

Article III​

The Democratic International Treaty Organisation members constitute a free trade zone and thus no tarriffs may be charged on member nations goods and services.

Article IV​

The Democratic International Treaty Organisation member nations agree to co-ordinate efforts on any natural or biological disaster that affects any member nation if requested.

Article V​

The Democratic International Treaty Organisation member nations agree to assit each other in educational efforts.

Article VI​

Any DITO nation may introduce a resolution binding all member nations if passed by a simple majority. The current Sec-General has veto power if shown proper cause.

Article VII​

Any nation requesting membership must be democratic, and futhermore must have the nomination of a current member nation. A simple majority vote from a nomination resolution is required for acceptance.

Article VIII​

Any DITO nation can nominate one of its citizens to become DITO Sec-General. An election is held, using a preferential system, to find the winner. No nation can vote for its own candidate to ensure that we have no deadlocks.
 
MEMBER NATIONS

250px-NATO-2002-Summit.jpg

Summit of NATO representatives​

Member Nations

Confederacy of Canada
Republic of Qubec
Republic of Newfoundland
United States of America current sec-gen
Federal Republic of Mexico
United States of Central America
Haitain Confederation #
Venzeualian Republic #
United States of Peru #
Republic of Paraguay #
Brazilian Federation #
Empire of Japan %
Russian Democratic Empire %^

#Denotes a nation whose defence is run through the Southern HQ in Lima, Peru, ie, South American
%Denotes a nation whose defence is run through the Pacific HQ in Sapporo, Japan
^Denotes a nation whose defence is run through Eastern HQ in Moscow, Russia

Invited Members (requiring vote)

Nations Requesting Nominations

none

Failed membership bids

none

Associate Members

Russian Democratic Empire (Russo-American Alliance - United States HQ, Minsk.)
Pacific Federation (USPAC Alliance - United States HQ, Hue)
The Greater Republic of China (Sino-American Alliance - United States HQ, Nanjing.)
The Arab Federation (ARABUS Alliance - United States HQ, Muscat)
Australia and New Zealand (ANZUS Alliance - United States HQ, Brisbane)
 
RESOLUTIONS

NOMINATION RESOLUTION I
USCA has nominated the Venzeualian Republic for membership to NATO
6 yea, 1 nay, PASSED

NOMINATION RESOLUTION II
USCA has nominated the United States of Peru for membership to NATO
7 yea, 0 nay,PASSED

NOMINATION RESOLUTION III
USCA has nominated the Republic of Paraguay for membership to NATO
7 yea, 0 nay PASSED

NOMINATION RESOLUTION IV
USCA has nominated the Brazilian Federation for membership to NATO
6 yea, 1 nay

RESOLUTION I

The NATO alliance should be renamed to a a name that better reflects its new members in South America.
11 yay, 0 nay PASSED

RESOLUTION II

The NATO alliance should accept (if wanted) members from outside the American continents. At the moment associate membership is granted, however if passed this resolution will allow full membership of nations such as Russia and Japan
9 yay, 2 nay PASSED

RESOLUTION III

The NATO alliance should begin research programs to benefit all members, one eco a turn payment requested to support these programs.
8 yay, 2 nay (Newfoundland yet to vote) PASSED

RESOLUTION IV

This resolution if passed committs the NATO alliance to keeping continued security around the world for all democratic nations and authorises after a vote, possible peacekeeping missions to protect such nations.
11 yay, 0 nay PASSED

RESOLUTION V

This resolution if passed authorises the creation of a small NATO strike force, elite troops with high tech, poised to deliver a stunning blow anywhere on the globe.
10 yay, 1 nay PASSED
 
This is a point we must discuss fully before we vote on the nations joining!

It is up to the NATO nations to consider if we should stay as we are, or bring democracy to South America and protect our entire landmass from attack?

I for one consider that South American nations entry into the alliance is a good thing.
 
In which country, should we have the South American countries nominate one as a condition of their entry? It could be perhaps on a international border
 
I will vote yes for:

United States of Peru (USCA)
Brazilian Federation (USCA)

With a South America Sub-HQ in Peru; Lima (to split terrorists attacks, nukes leathality)

The other two I will vote yes on too Sheeps convinced me, but i would much rather we would place stipulations on them to become more democratic.
 
Federal Republic of Mexico votes aye on all 4 reseloutions
United States of Central America votes aye on all 4 resoloutions
Haitain Confederation votes aye on all 4 resloutions
Republic of Newfoundland votes nay reseloution 1, votes aye resloution 2, votes nay resloution 4
 
We vote on all 4 South American nations joining. Their HQ is to be Lima, Peru by their consensus.
 
Argentina comes and laughs at the hipocricy of the nations here. They claim to be democratic yet they let in nations that are dictatorships like Paraguay and Venezula.
They also annocue together with Chile that the Glourious Peoples Repebulics consider this alliance a blatant threath against them and warn they will take measures to neautrlize it.
 
Canada votes AYE on all.
 
RESOLUTION I

The NATO alliance should be renamed to a a name that better reflects its new members in South America.

RESOLUTION II

The NATO alliance should accept (if wanted) members from outside the American continents. At the moment associate membership is granted, however if passed this resolution will allow full membership of nations such as Russia and Japan

RESOLUTION III

The NATO alliance should begin research programs to benefit all members, one eco a turn payment requested to support these programs.

RESOLUTION IV

This resolution if passed committs the NATO alliance to keeping continued security around the world for all democratic nations and authorises after a vote, possible peacekeeping missions to protect such nations.

RESOLUTION V

This resolution if passed authorises the creation of a small NATO strike force, elite troops with high tech, poised to deliver a stunning blow anywhere on the globe.

USA votes for yea on all five resolutions
 
Canada suggests the name of American Treaty Organization to replace NATO.

Canada votes aye on Resolutions I, II, IV, and V. Canada has reservations about Resolution III, and would like to know if it is suggested that nations pay the 1 eco/turn, or if it is mandatory that nations pay 1 eco a turn. Canada also asks about any penalties for not paying the 1 eco a turn, if it is mandatory.

Because Goober is feeling especially whiny, Canada would like to know if a vote will be taken on all Research Projects before they are started, or if they just need the authorization of the leader of the NATO to get approval.
 
Mexico Votes for Reseloutions I, IV & V an against II as it would bring the alliance into wars on other continents, something we do not want.

OOC: I can't say what way ill vote on III as i dont fully understand the economy yet.
 
OOC - Hellfury, I still don't understand the economy. My and das's economy system are like a Music Student trying to learn about Matrix Algebra!
 
Ok guys, now that we have adapted to Stormy's system of doing Economy, we all have more eco points to spend, so I think it's fair if we give one to joint NATO projects. provided we are doing projects for NATO.

Poor Sheepster has reduced internet because he was pirating music and movies, and stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Daftpanzer
DaftRTOR - A Story Untold
8 9 10
Replies
198
Views
22K
Terrance888
Terrance888
TheSpaceCowboy
Space Cowboy's Civilization VII
Replies
0
Views
1K
TheSpaceCowboy
TheSpaceCowboy
emzie
Cherokee Nation wants to send a delegate to the House
2 3 4
Replies
66
Views
6K
Bamspeedy
Bamspeedy
TerrisH
Out of the Portals, a Never Ending Story.
2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
13K
J.A.M.
J.A.M.
F
The Eternal Peace
2 3
Replies
52
Views
5K
Fins
F
Back
Top Bottom