Game options
- Thread starter PawelS
- Start date
warpstorm
Yumbo? Yumbo!
Then how would you determine the borders? Culture is a major part of the Civ design.
Zhahz
PC Gamer
Indeed, I love the culture and border concepts.
I'll go with default options for quite a while, I'm sure, then eventually try some options.
I'll go with default options for quite a while, I'm sure, then eventually try some options.
flobi
Rewrite Civilization
Don't think too harsh of the wild animals, it appears that they aren't very strong (unless compared to a settler), but they'll probably get your warriors exp, right?
JavalTigar
Overlord of the West
Random Personalities seems like the best way to spice up the game.
warpstorm said:
I have no problem with it when it expands your border over unclaimed territory, but the minute it causes your border to expand INTO an opponents land- basically STEALING his land is when it gets ridiculous. When the borders of two nations meet that border should be fixed except for adjustments after a war or diplomacy (trading/annexing land).
Rhymes
Drive 4 25 is back
The "one city challenge" seems very interesting. It, again, brings me to hope that there will be such monthly challenges for civ4!
jkp1187
Unindicted Co-Conspirator
What does "city flipping after conquest" mean?
elderotter
Otter King
listed several but love agressive AI.
tcjsavannah
Wow, it's been a while...
jkp1187 said:
I would assume this dials back the maddening trend of a city you just conquered going back to the other civ after two, three or five turns no matter how many troops you garrison in there.
But, my mama told me never to assume...
crazybeard
Warlord
I checked all the victory conditions, because I like to keep my options open.
I don't think that there is any optional condition that I would use all the time, but some of them (e.g., One City and Always Peace) are intriguing enough that I will try them out at least once.
I don't think that there is any optional condition that I would use all the time, but some of them (e.g., One City and Always Peace) are intriguing enough that I will try them out at least once.
phungus420
Deity
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2003
- Messages
- 6,296
jkp1187 said:
It means that even after you have destroyed a civ, a city can still fip back to them, resurecting the conqured civ.
Not all of those options are equal. Some are style choices (OCC, Always War, etc.), others are victory conditions, and others are rule changes. I'm highly unlikely to turn off any rules or abilities. City flipping? Ok. Tech trading? Ok. City razing? Ok. Permanent alliances, though, I would disable because they just don't seem right. You should always be able to back out. You may have to pay heavy consequences, but that should be your choice.
You won't regret it 
Similar threads
