A buddy of mine lost with 100.0% combat odds in his favor. 2 days later, he lost twice in a row with 99.8% combat odds in his favor. There was more cursing than I've ever heard.
Anyrate, I assume that the 100.0% lose was more truly a 99.95+% that had to be rounded up. As long as the opposing unit has a strength value there is a chance, if ever so slim, that it will be victorious.
Since the display only goes to 1 decimal place it may display odds as 100% due to rounding sometimes. You may therefore lose very occasionally when it displays odds of 100%. In any battle you in practice have a finite chance of losing (though it may be immensely slim), so you never genuinely have a 100% chance of winning.
Wait wait, spearmen get +100% vs mounted units and when attacking this is taken off of the defender, so why doesn't attacking a cavalry with no promotions yield an instant win for the spearman? I have to be missing something.
If a unit has +100% against another it means that it's relative strength is doubled, not its chance of winning the combat. In practice the way it does this is to halve the strength of the mounted unit when defending, so the spearman has a high, but not 100% chance of winning.
Wait wait, spearmen get +100% vs mounted units and when attacking this is taken off of the defender, so why doesn't attacking a cavalry with no promotions yield an instant win for the spearman? I have to be missing something.
When the Total effects are negative, ie spearman attacking Cavalry=-100% to cavalry,
then the effect of the bonus is different instead of adding that negative percentage, it makes the cavalries strength = Base / (1 + 'Penalty') amount
so the +100% only cuts the defender's strength in half if there are no other penalties/bonuses.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.