CFC members collaboration chance!

Comraddict

C.IV
Joined
Aug 2, 2003
Messages
1,702
Location
Iowa
I stole idea from other thread that talks about saddest wikipedia page. Well current CFC entry can be considered as a sad effort.

So why don't we each give some minor/major update?

Here's the link, everybody can use "edit this page" CFC wikipedia site
 
So, who is going to volunteer to write the part about the site's history? :p
 
SuperBeaverInc. said:
So, who is going to volunteer to write the part about the site's history? :p
You just did ;) :p

Heck, I might pitch in. Don't know what section for though.
 
Just added the stuff about how many posts and members we have. This is sorta fun, except it took me 20 minutes to figure out how to cite it from big boards.

EDIT: still don't have it working right, Could someone that knows about this stuff fix it so when they click on the citation it takes them to the References down at the bottom?
 
I'm in. No way i'd miss a chance like this.

Godwynn said:
still don't have it working right, Could someone that knows about this stuff fix it so when they click on the citation it takes them to the References down at the bottom?

I'll have a go at it.

*edit*
What do you mean by the "citation"?
 
Man, you aren't kidding, that article is currently horrible.
 
h4ppy said:
Man, you aren't kidding, that article is currently horrible.

Chill, its still an infant. Its been up for 3 hours and it is 3 in the morning here in the States. Give it time. :)
 
Because it is a leagal thing. I am officially asking thuderfall if we can add this guy:
fanatics7_logo3.gif
 
We gotta make this something special, apolyton already has a wikipedia entry.
 
Ultima Dragoon said:
Godwynn, what did you mean by the citation?

At the end of the sentence describing how many posts and members we have. There is a little number '1'. When clicked it is meant to take the viewer to the 'References' section and display the appropriate reference. It could be that the page is not long enough, or it just does not work. :confused:
 
Meleager said:
We already have. ;)

Godwynn said:
At the end of the sentence describing how many posts and members we have. There is a little number '1'. When clicked it is meant to take the viewer to the 'References' section and display the appropriate reference. It could be that the page is not long enough, or it just does not work.

Mkay. Having a go.

*edit* that http:// is not needed. changing it now.
*ninja edit* maybe it is...
*pirate edit* Too short's the problem.
 
Should this article focus more of the main site and then have a summary as well as an ofshoot for the forums. Seeing as they are on different urls it just seems to make sence. It means that we can go into each sub-forum without cluttering the page either.
 
Meleager said:
Should this article focus more of the main site and then have a summary as well as an ofshoot for the forums. Seeing as they are on different urls it just seems to make sence. It means that we can go into each sub-forum without cluttering the page either.

I was wondering the same thing. The main part should be about the actual site, and then a heading describing the forums, but still in the same CFC article.
 
I added a history section which someone else will have to extrapolate on since I haven't been around long enough.

We now have a menu :)
 
Back
Top Bottom