Please read this entire post before voting in the poll.
People v Curufinwe, Chief Justice
Trial Discussion Thread
As noted in the trial discussion thread, Curufinwe, the current Chief Justice, is accused of violating Article F Section 3 of the Constitution:
The Judiciary will carry out all its tasks in a fair, impartial, public and speedy manner.
in the matter of Judicial Review JR7, by refusing to appoint a pro-tempore justice for that specific JR, at the request of several citizens. The allegation is that failing to appoint a pro-tem violates the quoted article by not being impartial. It is noted without further comment that a Citizen Complaint proceeding takes a minimum of 4 days to process.
Citizens, you are asked to determine if the actions (or inactions) of Curufinwe in this action violated the above referenced law. This poll is not about deciding whether the referenced law is important, or the relative merits of the phrases contained in that law, or the degree to which this law may have been broken, or whether such action is justified. It is a simple question, was the law followed, or not followed.
As always in DemoGame trials, the accused, Curufinwe, is assumed to be innocent unless you, the citizens, determine that the actions in question did not follow the referenced law.
Vote Innocent if you think Curufinwe's actions followed the law.
Vote Guilty if you think Curufinwe's actions did not follow the law.
Vote Abstain if you are unable to decide.
This poll is private and will be open for 2 days, according to Judicial Procedures.
DaveShack,
Chief Justice pro-tempore
People v Curufinwe, Chief Justice
Trial Discussion Thread
As noted in the trial discussion thread, Curufinwe, the current Chief Justice, is accused of violating Article F Section 3 of the Constitution:
The Judiciary will carry out all its tasks in a fair, impartial, public and speedy manner.
Citizens, you are asked to determine if the actions (or inactions) of Curufinwe in this action violated the above referenced law. This poll is not about deciding whether the referenced law is important, or the relative merits of the phrases contained in that law, or the degree to which this law may have been broken, or whether such action is justified. It is a simple question, was the law followed, or not followed.
As always in DemoGame trials, the accused, Curufinwe, is assumed to be innocent unless you, the citizens, determine that the actions in question did not follow the referenced law.
Vote Innocent if you think Curufinwe's actions followed the law.
Vote Guilty if you think Curufinwe's actions did not follow the law.
Vote Abstain if you are unable to decide.
This poll is private and will be open for 2 days, according to Judicial Procedures.
DaveShack,
Chief Justice pro-tempore