make the UN shut up!

kazapp · Nov 9, 2006

I would like a checkbox in the UN proposals dialog "remember my answer and don't bother me again".

So I can always vote yes, always vote no or always abstain. Without having the popup dialog every now and again!

As it is now it is incredibly annoying to be pestered by the same proposals over and over again! :mad:

It makes you hesitate build it yourself, and nuke the civs that try back to the stone age!

Much like the real world, I know...

I know the UN is a big pain in the butt for some of our world leaders

but they can at least appoint an advisor to not have to deal with the constant pestering!

Lockesdonkey · Nov 9, 2006

You have a short attention span.

Get over it.

johnny42strom · Nov 9, 2006

Um, the UN comes so late and only every so often. Usually, in my games, by the time the UN comes, even if it does bother you every 6 turns or so, those turns are very long and involved, so I don't get annoyed at it. I mostly hate the UN for ruining my State Property.

caramac · Nov 11, 2006

Origionally Posted by johnny42strom
I mostly hate the UN for ruining my State Property.

State Property is the BEST CIVIC IN THE GAME! I just hate it when the U.N forces me to change as well.

Were the U.N in previous Civ games? I think it's an addition that is just in to make the end game more interesting - which it doesn't!! It only gets me frustrated, whether I'm SG or not.

The Swede · Nov 11, 2006

Why don't you guys uncheck the Diplomatic Victory box...

flamingzaroc121 · Nov 12, 2006

yeah, The Swede is right, if you turn it off, there is no UN

deanjack · Nov 12, 2006

I know the U.N can be annoying sometimes but i think it is a good feature to the game and i also think instead of only having the last civic options that they should include all civic options so you can make State property compulsary.But I don't really agree with this as you as a leader of a nation in civ 4 have the right to choose and not the U.N.

Lockesdonkey · Nov 12, 2006

caramac said:
State Property is the BEST CIVIC IN THE GAME!

If and only if you are a conquering murderer with a ridiculously large empire.

Revolutionary · Nov 12, 2006

Lockesdonkey said:
If and only if you are a conquering murderer with a ridiculously large empire.

you make it sound like thats such a bad thing :mischief:

caramac · Nov 13, 2006

Origionally Posted by Lockesdonkey
If and only if you are a conquering murderer with a ridiculously large empire.

Sometimes I start games with a peaceful mind but I always end up with a large empire and a few of my neighbours on 0pts.

State Property is simply the best civic to keep your finances under control!

It's definately harder to win with a small empire anyway.

Lockesdonkey · Nov 13, 2006

caramac said:
Sometimes I start games with a peaceful mind but I always end up with a large empire and a few of my neighbours on 0pts.

Never happened to me.

caramac said:
State Property is simply the best civic to keep your finances under control!

Wrong. Only if you have a big empire.

caramac said:
It's definately harder to win with a small empire anyway.

That's why I do it. You should try it sometime.

orinsul · Nov 13, 2006

caramac said:
Were the U.N in previous Civ games? I think it's an addition that is just in to make the end game more interesting - which it doesn't!! It only gets me frustrated, whether I'm SG or not.

the U.N. hasnt been in Civs in the same manner as it as it in civ 4, but its very similar to the planetary council in SMAC

Inspector Javert · Nov 19, 2006

i think a good addition in the next expansion would be to decline the invitation to join the UN at a -1-10 points for diplomatic realationships (You Refused to Join the UN) and the added danger of sactions (no trade with UN nations.) If you refuse to join the UN then the other member will have to vote you in should you decide to do so later.

Fuzzz · Nov 26, 2006

kazapp said:
Much like the real world, I know... I know the UN is a big pain in the butt for some of our world leaders

I bet you're American :rolleyes:

Kushluk · Dec 1, 2006

The whole State Property/Democracy thing should go both ways.

Forellenfilet · Dec 9, 2006

Well, you could be like me and raze the city housing the UN. :strength:

Macha · Dec 9, 2006

caramac said:
State Property is the BEST CIVIC IN THE GAME! I just hate it when the U.N forces me to change as well.

Were the U.N in previous Civ games? I think it's an addition that is just in to make the end game more interesting - which it doesn't!! It only gets me frustrated, whether I'm SG or not.

It was in civIII but it was only a diplo victory once every 10 turns betwwen the two biggest countrys and whoever built and you didn't have to call an election

Titus · Dec 9, 2006

I think the resolutions are rather interesting.

Macha · Dec 9, 2006

Some of them are but i hate having to lose serfdom as it is the best and emancipation is no good if everyone has it.

Titus · Dec 9, 2006

Yeah, I think you should be allowed to defy a resolution, but with a permanent negative modifier from every civ that adopted it (i.e. -3 "You refused to adopt emancipation!"), that would gradually fade once you DID adopt it yourself. The modifier would be different depending on the leader, and also signify how likely the leader is to break a resolution (Gandhi might take U.N. resolutions more seriously than, say, Tokugawa).

make the UN shut up!

Emperor

Liberal Jihadist

Chieftain

Chieftain

Viking

Emperor

Ruler of the Universe

Liberal Jihadist

Anarchy!

Chieftain

Liberal Jihadist

Warlord

Prince

you

Warlord

Chieftain

King

Armchair Great Person

King

Armchair Great Person

Similar threads