Would You Play?

Would you play a post-nuclear NES? See below for details.

  • Yes!

    Votes: 17 65.4%
  • No!

    Votes: 9 34.6%

  • Total voters
    26

Symphony D.

Deity
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
8,991
Location
ALNITAHIA FOREVER
Retroactive deletion.
 
Of course I would play. I have always wanted something like this to play in. And seeing as its you who is starting it. I feel it will be served its justice.
 
*yawn* screw you symph. *rolls out of thread*
 
I may join "after an indeterminate duration". ;)
 
If not everything related to Fallout is banned, I'd be interested. I mean that
 
Time permitting, I would certainly consider joining. Especially with your strong emphasis on originality. :thumbsup:
 
How about a limited nuclear exchange....enough to throw the world into chaos and give opportunities for warfare, but we keep our level of technology tanks, planes and so on. Of course I'm thinking on a global scale.
 
Which reminds me... Symph did you look up Storms NES on the same subject?
 
How about a limited nuclear exchange....enough to throw the world into chaos and give opportunities for warfare, but we keep our level of technology tanks, planes and so on. Of course I'm thinking on a global scale.

Collapse of global trade (or even national) would make the current level of tech hard to maintain - material from all over the world ends up in end products like the ones you've listed.
 
Well that's another reason for warfare...we use more less advanced weapons until we obtain the necessary resources for bigger boomsticks. Of course you can use logic and take all fun out of it dis :p
 
I would rather see the low-tech truly post-apocalyptic setting. I guess I've outgrown any facination I ever had for the über-boombastic. :rolleyes:
 
I'd be down
 
I would join, i like the originality approach.

On a seperate note, on your map, the coverage of New England, especially Massachusetts, is horrible. Seriously, it includes Reading(80,000) and York(40,000) but not Worchester(175,966)[pronounced Woo-ster, not Wore-chest-er] nor Springfield(152,082) for MA, it doesn't include Burlington(203,503) for VT, nor Hartford, which in its Metro Area has 1,184,241 people and is the 44th largest in America.
 
I will join as a nation in the surburbs of Toronto-area.. Markham is far enough from toronto that fallout might affect it, but it would be liveable. Ill base something around there. Mississauga would prob. be too close/built up to avoid bombing.
 
Retroactive deletion.
 
Ummmph...how about multiple 'cradles'?
 
Back
Top Bottom