The only unbias news.

Red Stranger

Emperor
Joined
Aug 28, 2005
Messages
1,678
I have an idea of how to achieve totally unbias news, but it'll probably be very expensive to implement. The idea is based on the Google Earth concept. We'll launch a million satellites; each covering a certain area of the globe. (Of course, there'll be some overlaps to cover disputed angle shots). The satellites will be capable of zooming in close enough to tell a dime from a penny. We'll also install hearing chips around the world to pick up what they're saying.

Sometimes you don't need to comment on the issue to show bias. You can show bias by simply reporting certain issues but not others. In my system, there'll be no news crew, hence no bias. The satellites will just operate 24/7, and it'll be up to you to.

It's probably too expensive to do now, but with improved technology it's doable.
 
No way in the world would this happnen. Its totally unfeasable.

Il take my biased news over this waste of tax dollars.

This is something a 10 year old would come up with red. Try harder.
 
That will never be worth it.

And besides there would be no commentator.
 
Launch half a million improved satellites! Look, there is no way you can have unbias news unless you can see everything.

Of course! Now all the citizens of the world may be spied upon by their governments. Great job Red! :goodjob:
 
No, NASA and other Space companies can barely afford a tin can, how will they be able to send out half a million satellites?
 
But we still need newscrews to do the in depth analysis to explain not just what happened but why it happened, and who and what are all the factors that are involved. Which will be biased.

Maybe we could just link up everyone like the Borg so we would know what everyone involved were thinking too.
 
Nobody has time to watch all that is happening in the world. There must be someone whose job it is to sift through all that is going on and pick the important things for us to see.
 
All them sattelites would crash into each other eventually.
 
YOU BASTARD! IT LEAVES OUT THE ACTIONS OF US MOLE-PEOPLE! I SHALL COME UP FROM THE GROUND UNDER YOUR HOUSE IN MY GREAT DIGGING RIG ABDUCT YOU AND FORCE YOU TO SLAVE IN OUR VAST MUSHROOM FARMS!

ugh, the intolerance
 
I think they should go ahead with the idea. That way we can all watch Red Stranger closely to see what makes such an interesting specimen tick. :p
 
Whoa there perfection. I think you should edit out that word or you will get in big trouble.
 
This isn't going to help with political news that needs to be analyzed or repercussion of events.
 
"Breaking News! We can still only see the top of the building and have no idea what is actually going on inside. Damn, I wish we hired an actual reporter."
 
There is no such thing as unbiased news.
 
I have an idea of how to achieve totally unbias news, but it'll probably be very expensive to implement. The idea is based on the Google Earth concept. We'll launch a million satellites; each covering a certain area of the globe. (Of course, there'll be some overlaps to cover disputed angle shots). The satellites will be capable of zooming in close enough to tell a dime from a penny. We'll also install hearing chips around the world to pick up what they're saying.

Sometimes you don't need to comment on the issue to show bias. You can show bias by simply reporting certain issues but not others. In my system, there'll be no news crew, hence no bias. The satellites will just operate 24/7, and it'll be up to you to.

It's probably too expensive to do now, but with improved technology it's doable.
Under what circumstances did you conceive this master plan?

Sure, if you want your entire life watched.
And that wouldn't be GoodEnoughForMe. Yes! I did it! I used your name in a response to you! I'm awesome.
 
Back
Top Bottom