This is an interesting article,
but from the article:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/08/real_estate/ethanol_fuels_rural_renaissance/index.htm
I think ethanol should be denounced, not praised.
but from the article:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/08/real_estate/ethanol_fuels_rural_renaissance/index.htm
"I wish ethanol production was a boon to the nation and the environment; it is not," he says. Even if every grain of corn went into ethanol production, it would still not make the United States oil independent, he notes.
"Look at it on a per-gallon basis," says Pimentel. "Our latest study indicates it takes 40 percent more fossil fuel energy to produce ethanol than it creates." Fossil fuels run farm and factory machinery, provide heat for the factories and transport ethanol to distant markets.
Pimentel says that corn, the No. 1 ethanol crop in the United States, requires more herbicides and insecticides to grow, needs large amounts of fertilizer and is responsible for more soil erosion than any other U.S. crop.
Furthermore, many of the areas benefiting most from ethanol production face water shortages; it takes 1,700 gallons of water to produce a gallon of ethanol, according to Pimentel.
I think ethanol should be denounced, not praised.