KNUT - live or die?

fate of knut!

  • knut's too cute to die

    Votes: 49 90.7%
  • the Maneater shall be put down!

    Votes: 1 1.9%
  • radioactive polarbears live on tropical islands!

    Votes: 4 7.4%

  • Total voters
    54

soul_warrior

Termite!
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
6,443
Location
Sydney, NSW
An animal rights activist has been condemned for suggesting that an abandoned polar bear cub should be killed instead of being raised by humans.
Knut was born in Berlin Zoo last December but his mother ignored him and his brother, who later died.
Activist Frank Albrecht was quoted in the Bild newspaper, which has run photo spreads of the little bear, as saying: "Feeding by hand is not species-appropriate but a gross violation of animal protection laws.
"The zoo must kill the bear."
The comments were quickly condemned by the zoo, politicians and other animal rights groups.
"The killing of an animal has nothing to do with animal protection," said Wolfgang Apel, head of the German Federation for the Protection of Animals.

Mr Albrecht has claimed he was quoted out of context.
He explained that although he thought it was wrong of the zoo to have saved the cub's life, now that the bear can live on his own, it would be equally wrong to kill him.
"If a polar bear mother rejected the baby, then I believe the zoo must follow the instincts of nature," Mr Albrecht said.
"In the wild, it would have been left to die."
Other activists have claimed that current treatment of the cub is inhumane and could lead to future difficulties interacting with fellow polar bears.
But Berlin Zoo's vet, Andre Schuele, who is looking after Knut, disagrees.
He said: "These criticisms make me angry, but you can't take them so seriously. Polar bears live alone in the wild; I see no logical reason why this bear should be killed."
He also argued that given the increased rarity of polar bears in the wild, it makes sense to keep them alive in captivity so that they can be bred.

persoanlly im in the thought that the cuddly one should be kept alive.
the benefit of HIS species is far more important than the morals of some tree hugger.
you just have to know when youre going to lose more than you gain...

your thoughts?

source
and a picture gallery of the little critter
 
The fact that Mr. Albrecht had to turn to Bild to get his viewpoint published speaks volumes. Bild is about as useful and informative as used toilet paper...

How did this make it into international news, anyway?
 
"If a polar bear mother rejected the baby, then I believe the zoo must follow the instincts of nature," Mr Albrecht said.
"In the wild, it would have been left to die."
Its not in the wild, its in a zoo. The court rules that the bear will live. Case closed[/gavel bang]
 
Polar bears are considered a vulnerable species. Why kill a baby polar bear just because it's mother rejected it? Keep him alive and in the future he can produce more baby polar bears.
 
The fact that Mr. Albrecht had to turn to Bild to get his viewpoint published speaks volumes. Bild is about as useful and informative as used toilet paper...
hey, why do you insult used toilet paper? ;)

How did this make it into international news, anyway?
if the story is silly enough it will be carried abroad....:crazyeye:

I don't see the problem with raising him, he's gonna spend his life in a cage anyway, so why does it matter if he isn't raised in the 'real' icebear way?
 
Welcome back Ingvina Freyr. :)

And yeah this has gone international, I read about it yesterday. Thats one cute fluffy fatty (The bear, not the guy).
 
How did this make it into international news, anyway?

it involves a fluffy baby, that always does it. i saw this on our *national* news program. war, famine, cuddly bear. i voted it should live, but the moment it appears on an afternoon chat show...:ar15:
 
cthom said:
i saw this on our *national* news program. war, famine, cuddly bear.
That's how it works isn't it?
War! -Heeaard it!
Famine! -Boooring!
Cuddly bear! -Aww, isn't that cute?
Jawz II said:
Welcome back Ingvina Freyr. :)
Why, thank you! :hatsoff:
 
"If a polar bear mother rejected the baby, then I believe the zoo must follow the instincts of nature," Mr Albrecht said.

Mankind should follow the instincts of nature? Since when? We'd have one nasty world if we did that more often.
 
Knut is a ZOO animal, for chrissake! His 'job' is to be cute, and later awesome, and educate people about animals. What does that have to do with the wild?


This 'animal rights activist' is not what he claims to be, but a brain-amputated moron.
 
I would rearrange the letters of the name of the bear to adequately show what I think of those who think that the bear deserves to die, but if it were a bunny rabbit, then it aught to die, just to make those kids shut up at the back of the bus.
 
I think that polar bears are not that significant in the food chain, since they are predators with no natural enemies & they live in an environment where they do not seem to be providing any service to any other organism. Therefore it would not be so tragic if they became extinct.
In which case a polar safari would be in order :)
 
Couldn't we just feed Mr Albrecht to Knut? :mischief:

The person who voted to kill Knut should own up! :mad:



On a serious note I did read the argument that Knut keeps having new handlers which he treats as parents. Each time the handler changes it's damaging to Knut (perhaps like a young child having his/her parents divorcing repeatedly). Could something be done to solve this problem?
 
Back
Top Bottom