de Gaulle is quite aggressive
From my limited experience so far, Boudica is a whackjob. She's declared war on three separate civilizations during my game, and extensive espionage efforts in her cities have revealed a ridiculous amount of units fortified in her cities.
If that's the case then Asoka was preparing a helluva long time to declare war on me. I hate that Indian fairy queen.
Umm. If my understanding of this is right: If Boudica has 0% chance of going to war at pleased while Genghis has 10% at pleased, and Genghis has a higher unit build prob, and all other things being equal, and that the 'bastards' are at the top, then why was Boudica above Genghis? And why was she given a higher total? Just curious. (btw, I think Ragnar is above Monty because Ragnar has a higher unit build prob)Here is my attempt to read the same numbers as Blake posted as relates to the new leaders in BtS. The only column which is not the same is the Total (I don't know how Blake computed that), but I tried to approximate the given numbers with a linear fit. I hope this gives a rough idea:
Analysis:
As expected, Boudica is a whackjob but at least she won't attack you at Pleased. Justinian and Oranje are pretty far up in the pecking order, as is Charlemagne. Lincoln would be otherwise OK but he has an amazing tendency to dogpile.
In short, most of the new BtS leaders are aggressive jerks.
