aneeshm
Deity
This is thread 06 in the Devil's Advocate line of threads.
In these threads, all posters have to take exactly the opposite stance to the ones they usually take. Thus, for example, I will defend Shariah law and defend the legal "rights" of Muslims to take four wives if they want. And I'll do it sincerely, not satirically.
Note that things used here cannot be used against you in normal forum debates except in other DA debates.
The other rules and list of topics are given here: Let's play Devil's Advocate!.
Please be sure to read the rules - they're the distilled wisdom collected over all the DA threads till now.
This DA thread is meant to discuss Senator Hillary Clinton. Love her or hate her, you can't ignore her. Having already caused much debate over her gender, her policies on healthcare and videogames are the ones that generate the most debate among those of us here on CFC.
Whatever your opinion of her is, in this thread, you have to argue for a logically coherent opposite. I know, it seems completely impossible that anything that is in opposition to your opinion can conceivably be logically coherent. But we are here to gain insight into how the other side thinks we think, so give it your best shot.
As this is an emotive topic, it'd be rather amiss of me not to kick it off with a bit of an emotional bang:

In these threads, all posters have to take exactly the opposite stance to the ones they usually take. Thus, for example, I will defend Shariah law and defend the legal "rights" of Muslims to take four wives if they want. And I'll do it sincerely, not satirically.
Note that things used here cannot be used against you in normal forum debates except in other DA debates.
The other rules and list of topics are given here: Let's play Devil's Advocate!.
Please be sure to read the rules - they're the distilled wisdom collected over all the DA threads till now.
This DA thread is meant to discuss Senator Hillary Clinton. Love her or hate her, you can't ignore her. Having already caused much debate over her gender, her policies on healthcare and videogames are the ones that generate the most debate among those of us here on CFC.
Whatever your opinion of her is, in this thread, you have to argue for a logically coherent opposite. I know, it seems completely impossible that anything that is in opposition to your opinion can conceivably be logically coherent. But we are here to gain insight into how the other side thinks we think, so give it your best shot.
As this is an emotive topic, it'd be rather amiss of me not to kick it off with a bit of an emotional bang:

