ABNW 2: Rome Peace Conference

Adrogans

Quiet Laughter...
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
4,210
Location
The Woods
Peace Conference of Rome

The Republic of Italy welcomes all those involved in the war wishing to attend The Peace Conference of Rome.
 
Peace with Quebec with be reached outside of these Peace talks. Canada will not agree to anything in regards to Quebec that is stated here.
 
Italy would like to resolve the conflict as a whole with France, and Quebec is a protectorate of France.

@- Milarqui - Can you post a map?
 
From: Mexico

Mexico desires to decide the fate of both New France and Alaska.

Mexico also desires that Spain be given independence from France.

We also suggest that Quebec be included in this peace conference. If all powers can come to an agreement on all matters we believe that we may to able to avoid another Great war from ever occurring.
 
Sark demands a slice.
 
Sauk is willing to accept the dissolution of our nation as long as all territories populated by Algonquian natives, and thus most of the Kingdom of Sauk, are allowed to become part of the Fox Republic, de facto making the Fox republic a Pan-Algonquian nation.
 
This is a peace conference, not a surrender. France has yet to surrender but we are willing to negotiate a peace of equals. As it stands, the cowardly traitor nation of Denmark has no right to demand land from France, especially in a region of the world our troops still dominate handily.

As for you, Mexico, we cannot help but allow you to do as you will with New France (we've no jurisdiction over Alaska). Our time in North America has come to an end. With regards to Spain, we ask that the Mexicans consider that Spain is part of a Bourbon union with France, legalized by our blood connection. It is as unlawful as separating California from Mexico.

As for Quebec, we care not for our wayward colonials any longer. We will allow the New English to deal with them as they like... however we request that the Hudson corridor to the Sauk remain open, lest they be surrounded by savages.

As for our requests:

1. That Sauk be permitted to remain independent, and its independence be guaranteed by the New English Imperial Protectorate.

2. France retain control over her African and Indian colonial possessions. The only alternative is independence, hardly a desirable end.

3. France is retain control over France proper and Spain.

Our concessions:

1. Northern Italy and the Adriatic Coast be returned to the control of the Republic of Italy.

2. France renounce influence in North America and detach herself thereof.

3. The complete dissolution of the French Imperial Protectorate, and independence granted to all former members.


We think these are fair.
 
Our mistake. Sorry if it seemed that we were making it sound like it was a surrender. We were just asking for a concession from you. Notice that you would still keep a lot of land. We are willing to drop the petition for South African lands, however the two strips of land in West Africa are a petition that will stand. We also ask that Spain is independent again.
 
The two strips in West Africa is an acceptable theft.
 
Italy sees no point in making Spain independent as they have historically been tied with France and they have been united for a long time.
 
The Zulu Empire demands the lands south and west of the Zambezi River, that the nations of Tonga and Lunda be created to our north. The Kingdoms of Zambezi and Lunda would be under the wing of Zulu until they are strong enough to exist independently. Zulu will regulate the area and make sure it remains peaceful.

NewAfrica2.jpg


The darker pink area will go to Zulu.
The brown area will become Tonga.
The lime green area will become Lunda.

OOC: Maybe I took this thread out of context. If I did...I apologize and will remove this post.
 
Zulu has no bargaining chips and we refuse to accede.
 
Back
Top Bottom