The advantages of being in a Republic Government

Cyc

Cyc

Looking for the door...
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
14,736
Location
Behind you
The issue has been raised that our Tribe might be better off as a Monarchy rather than a Republic. There are certainly advantages to both governments, but are there greater advantages for an Agricultural and Religious Tribe to be a Republic (even early in the game)?
 
We cannot allow a single king or queen to rule our people! We must have representation, is this not what we fought to found or civilization on? The judicial and legislative branches could be erased from our government's existence under a monarchy!
 
civplayah, i am billybones27. :gripe:
the government doesn't necessarily represent our own government system. i don't want that interrupting strategic choices, and a monarchy could be a lot better than a repub.
 
Republic is better partly because there is more raw commerce that can become beakers or cash to rush or upgrade units. With Republic, we can have faster tech progression. We'll have to be more careful with wars, but by no means is war impossible to manage with a Republic.
 
billybones27 said:
civplayah, i am billybones27. :gripe:
the government doesn't necessarily represent our own government system. i don't want that interrupting strategic choices, and a monarchy could be a lot better than a repub.
Click to expand...
:lol:
You are right, billybones27. Our Demogame government will not change it's system just because the in-game government changes. This is "The Democracy Game". So our decision-making process will remain the same.

But I agree with TheOverseer714's reasons and there's more. Everything, except War Weariness is better. We may even find ourselves in a war before we achieve the Republic Technology. Then we would wait until the war ends before we changed our government style. I do like learning the Monarchy Tech, as I always enjoy building the Hanging Gardens.

But keep plugging away, ya never know, ya might get what ya ask fer.
 
billybones27 said:
civplayah, i am billybones27. :gripe:
the government doesn't necessarily represent our own government system. i don't want that interrupting strategic choices, and a monarchy could be a lot better than a repub.
Click to expand...

Sorry. You guys both have tanks, and I wasn't paying attention.
 
billybones27 said:
civplayah, i am billybones27. :gripe:
the government doesn't necessarily represent our own government system. i don't want that interrupting strategic choices, and a monarchy could be a lot better than a repub.
Click to expand...
Their propaganda is working! We cannot listen to these "elite" when they say that by giving them all the power we will be able to fight wars better. Back when this country was founded we joined together under the ideals of equal representation, we cannot just give unlimited power to the elite because we fear war!
 
I think people are missing what Black Hole is really saying...

He's basically illustrating that not all our decisions need be strategy based.

ie. in roleplaying fashion a Democratic group should be opposed to to being in a dictatorship of any sort. Regardless of the pros or cons.
 
An interesting point, imo the strategic arguments are winning here though; republic allows greater economic growth which will underlie our later development including our war-making abilities. I know that conflicts require more management under republic but isn't that why we're all here - just think of the debates we can have over where to send our one warrior! ;) Moreover, as Cyc points out, we don't know how the game's going to go; should we find ourselves at war early on we'll probably have to adapt our policies to suit our needs and hold off on Republic until we're ready.

The over-all plan is flexible; I think we just need a preferred direction here. An early Republic would get my vote.
 
Falcon02 said:
He's basically illustrating that not all our decisions need be strategy based.

ie. in roleplaying fashion a Democratic group should be opposed to to being in a dictatorship of any sort. Regardless of the pros or cons.
Click to expand...

which confuses me, as decisions should come before roleplay, we aren't here to lose and say that the reason we lost is because we chose role play above proper decision making. if a monarchy is better, than we ignore the fact that we are an actual democracy and go for monarchy.

anyway, wouldn't we want to see our surrounding terrain and neighbors before we decide? i mean, if there aren't many goldmaking spots, then the republic gold bonus would easily be outpaced by the extra money we'd have to spend on lux slider and unit support.
 
Different people have different motivations/priorities.

Civ 3 DG1 alot of people were for using despotism pop rushing to help give us a leg up early on. But the idea behind the game mechanism is slavery, and the idea got voted down based on that principle alone, that as a free-minded people who value liberty we should not use slavery. I believe that game was also spent mostly in Republic/Democracy Governments.

We also had some Forest reserves that were forbidden to be cut down despite that it would have increased city productivity.

We still dominated and won that game. Overall, any decision based on RPG shouldn't be so bad that it has a great potential of causing a destruction. It's a large part of the fun for many. Discussion such decisions and making decisions more on beliefs then gameplay.


Anyway... I think Billybones27 is correct... the final poll/decision should probobly be after game creation at least. But by the first turn we should have an initial idea which one we want to aim for to start off with to know where to aim our tech.
 
billybones27 said:
which confuses me, as decisions should come before roleplay, we aren't here to lose and say that the reason we lost is because we chose role play above proper decision making. if a monarchy is better, than we ignore the fact that we are an actual democracy and go for monarchy.

anyway, wouldn't we want to see our surrounding terrain and neighbors before we decide? i mean, if there aren't many goldmaking spots, then the republic gold bonus would easily be outpaced by the extra money we'd have to spend on lux slider and unit support.
Click to expand...
We have played plenty of games where we try to play perfect and win. I think the idea of playing on Monarch is that it would allow us to have our decisiosn be influenced by roleplay instead of purely what is mechanically better. As such, all of my arguments you will see this game will be of roleplay nature and not game mechanics, because I find that more enjoyable.
 
Falcon02 said:
I think people are missing what Black Hole is really saying...

He's basically illustrating that not all our decisions need be strategy based.
Click to expand...
:) I didn't miss it. I just wasn't able to match Black_Hole's RP skill. If I had more time....



Black_Hole said:
We have played plenty of games where we try to play perfect and win. I think the idea of playing on Monarch is that it would allow us to have our decisiosn be influenced by roleplay instead of purely what is mechanically better. As such, all of my arguments you will see this game will be of roleplay nature and not game mechanics, because I find that more enjoyable.
Click to expand...
I like this. The ideal way to play a DemoGame, IMO. By George, no wonder I appointed you Chief Justice. I don't miss the beheadings at all...
 
You have an excellent point, Black Hole. I guess we can beat the AI on Monarch easily, we might as well take the fum to the next level. I support a republic now.
 
were religious so switching bet govts wouldnt be a prob
id rather republic at peacetime, just switch to monarchy for war (obviously) =)
 
Once we are a Republic, couldn't we elect our King?
 
Sure, and you'd be next in line, but pirates can't be King. Sorry.
 
We have discovered how to be a republic. Now the question becomes when.

Should we finish the settler currently being built and have our anarchy while it is moving?
Should we wait until the secret of Iron Working has been discovered?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Eddie Verdde
Should the number of actions per turn be determined by the type of government/policies? A new yield: SOVEREIGNTY POINTS
Replies
0
Views
609
Eddie Verdde
Eddie Verdde
Predator145
Modding civ traits: The Ottomans
Replies
6
Views
562
Predator145
Predator145
planetfall
What is the advantage, if any, of enabling barbs?
Replies
8
Views
1K
Ordnael
Ordnael
FXS_Sar
New Civ Game Guide: Republic of Pirates (Tides of Power)
6 7 8
Replies
143
Views
8K
MutilationWave
MutilationWave
K
What if religions couldn't be controlled, only welcomed or suppressed?
Replies
9
Views
933
Nic@Melbourne
N
Back
Top Bottom