WI Obama slipped and broke his jaw in his masturbatorium?

Status
Not open for further replies.

RedRalph

Deity
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
20,708
Imagine this.

Obama whimsically decides to have a tiled masturbatorium installed in the White House, reasoning 'I'm the black President of a country more powerful than Rome ever was, why shouldn't I have one?". His wife and the JCOS agree, so they go ahead with it. As it installed, Obama is sometimes seen to excitedly breakdance near the workmen who are putting it in, constantly asking them questions about their tools and getting in the way.

Then one day, the POTUS is summoned urgently from his pullparlour when news reaches the US that Georgia has invaded Russia. Startled and springing to his feet, he slips spectacularly on a wet patch on the pristine white ivory wipe-clean tiles, lands on his chin and shatters his jaw on the surface of his throneroom of the tugtacular. "Ulfff!!!" is what he says as his body, wracked with pain, dances a grim lambada of agony, twitching and popping on the floor.

At first the White House tries to claim Obama broke his jaw in a fight with a maid, but after an interview with the plumber who installed the room, the trooth emerges and Obama, with a speech impediment as a result of his injury, gives the following speech:

"My gellow Amerigans. I'm sorry to report that the rekent aggegations agout me hagging groke by jaw in a gastrugatorium of gy own gonstrgugtion are true. Gowever, I do not gelieve that this should impede gy ability to goo gy job. as a result, I will gontinue in office and exgect the full support of the American people. Gank you".

Now, I realise this may seem a bit like a troll thread or some sort of messing, but it honestly isn't. I dont know that much about US constitutional law and want to learn more, so could anyone tell me the constitutional ramifications of this happening? Would he be forced to abdicate? I'd be especially interested to hear from people who have legal experience in this area, such as I'm Cleo! or .shane.
 
You should've thought of a scenario that didn't involve masturbation because people won't be able to take this seriously.
:confused::confused::confused: I never once mentioned masturbation. and nor would I, that would make this thread get locked.
 
Hang on I'm going to do a few edits to the OP, I forgot some important details
 
While it is illegal for a government official to make false statements to the people, in practice it's not enforced. It would have to come down to impeachment, which is a political process.

Cleo
 
While it is illegal for a government official to make false statements to the people, in practice it's not enforced. It would have to come down to impeachment, which is a political process.

Cleo

Let's he personally hadn't commented until then, and up until that point Michelle Obama had been the one who claimed it was a fight with a maid (because he had confronted her after catching her stealing), then would he still be liable?
 
I believe it would become more of an issue regarding the funding for the mastabutorium, did he use public taxpayer money to build his masturbatorium? Because that could make it look very bad especially from a publicity standpoint.
 
I believe it would become more of an issue regarding the funding for the mastabutorium, did he use public taxpayer money to build his masturbatorium? Because that could make it look very bad especially from a publicity standpoint.

He gave a speech were he described the rooms as "by my own pocket, of my own pocket and for my own pocket"
 
Oh well that's quite fine indeed. No I don't believe this would warrant either the nessecary nor sufficent conditions that would warrant impeachement. As we know impeachment is carried out in the case of high crimes, misdemnoers, and treason. None of which that would really fall under, even misdemoners would be a streach. Further the other condition include Republican control of the House to start the impeachment process and the Senate to convict. A high degree of unpopularity, as well as a serious legitamacy question.

These conditions simply wouldn't exist, masabutorium or no mastubatorium.
 
Oh well that's quite fine indeed. No I don't believe this would warrant either the nessecary nor sufficent conditions that would warrant impeachement. As we know impeachment is carried out in the case of high crimes, misdemnoers, and treason. None of which that would really fall under, even misdemoners would be a streach. Further the other condition include Republican control of the House to start the impeachment process and the Senate to convict. A high degree of unpopularity, as well as a serious legitamacy question.

These conditions simply wouldn't exist, masabutorium or no mastubatorium.

Racist
 
Well, Presidents don't do it themselves. They have a special position for that. It's called the White House intern.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom