I don't agree with them but....

GhostWriter16 · May 22, 2010

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1694386/posts

.... Don't you think its interesting how many of these posters want us to :nuke:

Iran? Well, there's definitely an issue and people know Iran would be dangerous with nukes, enough to nuke them if it was the only option, but just invading would work fine. Well, interesting? What do you think (I mean, obviously we shouldn't nuke Iran yet but if there was a chance they'd fire, would you support it.)

sophie · May 22, 2010

Translation: I don't want to say I want to nuke Iran, but look at all these people who want to nuke Iran, therefore I think we should nuke Iran.

Grimz101 · May 22, 2010

Why should the United States and the others be the only ones allowed to have nukes?
My thought is that we should ignore the idiots and then they'll finally get rid on him in Iran we he can no longer play on the "ZOMG AMERICANZ INTERFERING" issue. The leaders of Iran are not suicidal enough to ever use a nuke.

ParadigmShifter · May 22, 2010

Lots of people in America seem to want to nuke other people. I say we nuke America to stop this threat.

I don't agree with it, but it seems like a good solution.

JollyRoger · May 22, 2010

We should nuke Israel to protect them from being nuked by Iran.

GhostWriter16 · May 22, 2010

ParadigmShifter said:
Lots of people in America seem to want to nuke other people. I say we nuke America to stop this threat.

I don't agree with it, but it seems like a good solution.

Owen Glyndwr said:
Translation: I don't want to say I want to nuke Iran, but look at all these people who want to nuke Iran, therefore I think we should nuke Iran.

Ok, I admit that made me laugh out loud (Both of you.) However, my point was, "Look at all the people that think its an issue, message to all of you, maybe it is."

I don't think using a nuke would be smart. I think we should just use conventional bombs and missiles and put them in the dust, threat stopped.

The Koran says that Muslims are to kill Christians and infidels. Also, Saddam Hussein said at one point if he had nukes he would use them against the United States. That's Muslim holy war, they fight against westerners with everything they have. They need to be dealt with.

Paradigm- Nuke the US :lol:

You would be destroyed. Annihilated within a day.

Jollyroger, that makes perfect sense. We'll protect you from dying by killing you.

JollyRoger · May 22, 2010

Domination3000 said:
Jollyroger, that makes perfect sense. We'll protect you from dying by killing you.

We'll protect the world from a country using nukes by nuking it makes just as much sense.

ParadigmShifter · May 22, 2010

I said I don't agree with it.

America is the biggest threat to world peace though, and you are part of the problem.

GhostWriter16 · May 22, 2010

JollyRoger said:
We'll protect the world from a country using nukes by nuking it makes just as much sense.

No, that doesn't work. Even though I DO NOT support nuking Iran, this is very different.

Iran nuking Israel should be stopped, but not by nuking Israel. This makes no sense.

I'm not gonna continue since you are not serious.

Paradigm, I could debate you on the logic of this, but it was so funny I'll just laugh. :lol:

spryllino · May 22, 2010

Domination3000 said:
The Koran says that Muslims are to kill Christians and infidels. Also, Saddam Hussein said at one point if he had nukes he would use them against the United States. That's Muslim holy war, they fight against westerners with everything they have. They need to be dealt with.

Are there any Muslims at all in your neck of the woods? Have you ever read the Koran? Have you got a quote from Saddam Hussein about bombing America with nuclear weapons? Have you any mind whatsoever to believe anything that you didn't see on Fox News?

Moderator Action: Trolling.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

sophie · May 22, 2010

Domination3000 said:
The Koran says that Muslims are to kill Christians and infidels. Also, Saddam Hussein said at one point if he had nukes he would use them against the United States. That's Muslim holy war, they fight against westerners with everything they have. They need to be dealt with.

Care to show me the part of the Bible that says that?

I have one:

And do not dispute with the followers of the Book except by what is best, except those of them who act unjustly, and say: We believe in that which has been revealed to us and revealed to you, and our God and your God is One, and to Him do we submit. [Qur'an 29:46]

GhostWriter16 · May 22, 2010

Owen Glyndwr said:
Care to show me the part of the Bible that says that?

I have one:

The Koran isn't the Bible.

And, I mostly found it interesting how many people consider Iran such a threat that we should actually nuke them.

I agree they are a major threat, at least to the point they could kill 8 million by nuking NY City.

They wouldn't destroy our country completely, but I ask Americans, is that worth it? Wouldn't it be better to put a nuke on their soil then waiting for them to nuke us.

Just to Paradigm, If I REALLY thought Britain was going to nuke us, and I mean REALLY believed it, I wouldn't wait for them to shoot first, I'd wipe 'em off the face of the Earth. But, Britain would never be so insane, neither would China, Russia, or any other country currently wielding nukes. Iran would.

If the only way to stop them from getting their nuke was to nuke them, I'd favor it. However, I still think we can bomb them with conventional weapons. Time remains.

ParadigmShifter · May 22, 2010

I'm talking about the whole world except America realising the main threat to the world is America and offering an ultimatum:

1) Since you can go to the moon, off you all go there

or

2) We'll all nuke you

EDIT: We can call it the second age of enlightenment if you will.

Bill3000 · May 22, 2010

Interesting?

Don't you think that it is interesting that people believe that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990? Don't you think that there must be some truth to these rumors if people were discussing it?

GhostWriter16 · May 22, 2010

ParadigmShifter said:
I'm talking about the whole world except America realising the main threat to the world is America and offering an ultimatum:

1) Since you can go to the moon, off you all go there

or

2) We'll all nuke you

EDIT: We can call it the second age of enlightenment if you will.

Ok, we have enough nukes to destroy everyone else too, so, we'd all die. Iran doesn't have nukes yet, thank goodness.

I definitely think when we first got the things as soon as we were done with Japan we should have demanded a Russian surrender, and, if they refused, nuked Moscow to prevent the years of devastation and near nuclear war that followed.

Bill3000 said:
Interesting?

Don't you think that it is interesting that people believe that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990? Don't you think that there must be some truth to these rumors if people were discussing it?

Well, this is a provable fact, whether or not it happened. I'm pretty sure there's no proof this happened, and besides, this is an opinionated issue. So, no correlation.

Grimz101 · May 22, 2010

Domination3000 said:
The Koran isn't the Bible.

And, I mostly found it interesting how many people consider Iran such a threat that we should actually nuke them.

I agree they are a major threat, at least to the point they could kill 8 million by nuking NY City.

They wouldn't destroy our country completely, but I ask Americans, is that worth it? Wouldn't it be better to put a nuke on their soil then waiting for them to nuke us.

Just to Paradigm, If I REALLY thought Britain was going to nuke us, and I mean REALLY believed it, I wouldn't wait for them to shoot first, I'd wipe 'em off the face of the Earth. But, Britain would never be so insane, neither would China, Russia, or any other country currently wielding nukes. Iran would.

If the only way to stop them from getting their nuke was to nuke them, I'd favor it. However, I still think we can bomb them with conventional weapons. Time remains.

Major Threat? What have you been snorting? they couldn't kill anyone in New York.
Yes Saddam probably said he'd nuke America if he could because the middle east is unstable and he wanted to scare his major rival Iran. These people aren't sucidal you just do not seem to understand the art of politics, do not take everything literally, read inbetween the lines, or stop talking about world affairs.

ParadigmShifter · May 22, 2010

Domination3000 said:
Ok, we have enough nukes to destroy everyone else too, so, we'd all die. Iran doesn't have nukes yet, thank goodness.

I definitely think when we first got the things as soon as we were done with Japan we should have demanded a Russian surrender, and, if they refused, nuked Moscow to prevent the years of devastation and near nuclear war that followed.

Well, this is a provable fact, whether or not it happened. I'm pretty sure there's no proof this happened, and besides, this is an opinionated issue. So, no correlation.

And then we'd all know whether evolution was true or not, so it's a win/win situation.

GhostWriter16 · May 22, 2010

ParadigmShifter said:
And then we'd all know whether evolution was true or not, so it's a win/win situation.

Huh.

If we took care of Russia before they got nukes they've been no threat to us. But we let them unfortunately. In fact, Stalin was just as evil as Hitler.

I understand we had to be political during the war, but immediately thereafter, we should've handled Russia.

Virote_Considon · May 22, 2010

Domination3000 said:
Huh.

If we took care of Russia before they got nukes they've been no threat to us. But we let them unfortunately. In fact, Stalin was just as evil as Hitler.

I understand we had to be political during the war, but immediately thereafter, we should've handled Russia.

Actually, I'm more interested in the accusation that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990

sophie · May 22, 2010

Domination3000 said:
The Koran isn't the Bible.

And, I mostly found it interesting how many people consider Iran such a threat that we should actually nuke them.

I agree they are a major threat, at least to the point they could kill 8 million by nuking NY City.

They wouldn't destroy our country completely, but I ask Americans, is that worth it? Wouldn't it be better to put a nuke on their soil then waiting for them to nuke us.

Just to Paradigm, If I REALLY thought Britain was going to nuke us, and I mean REALLY believed it, I wouldn't wait for them to shoot first, I'd wipe 'em off the face of the Earth. But, Britain would never be so insane, neither would China, Russia, or any other country currently wielding nukes. Iran would.

If the only way to stop them from getting their nuke was to nuke them, I'd favor it. However, I still think we can bomb them with conventional weapons. Time remains.

It's a typo, so sue me. The point remains the same, find a passage in the Koran saying that Muslims have a moral duty to kill Christians. The fact of the matter is the Koran has a hell of a lot more to say about peace than violence.

I don't agree with them but....

Deity

Break My Heart

King

Random Nonsense Generator

Slippin' Jimmy

Deity

Slippin' Jimmy

Random Nonsense Generator

Deity

Deity

Break My Heart

Deity

Random Nonsense Generator

OOOH NOOOOOOO!

Deity

King

Random Nonsense Generator

Deity

The Great Dictator

Break My Heart

Similar threads