civ v criticism, or, how i learned to start worrying and hate the game

so um ya ok guys civ v has a lot of problems.

for starters lets make a list

1. too many graphics. i can't understand why firaxis cant just make lower graphics, right now its too much for my computer to handle
2. buggy ai. i don't care if there trying to fix it, im a business major and i can tell you ai is the easiest thing in the world to program. they arent doing it because they are lazy.
3. no diplomacy. leaderheads should be replaced with numbers so i can tell what they are feeling more easily
4. hexadecimals. WTH i wanted to play civilizations not panzers geeneral. i hate this b/c in the old games i could just spam a bunch of units and fight every enemy city. this was a better system because it requires more strategy than planning and executing maneuvers.
5. firaxis is evil. just saying, i saw them shoot a puppy.
6. steam is bullshoot. the valve corporation is the sworn enemy of gamers everywhere and steam is just they're way of keeping tabs on me. their spies.
7. not as good as civ iv or as i call it the best game ever created.
8. the new economy system sucks, WTH this is bs now i have to plan ahead? thats the dumbest thing, the slider was much deeper and much more complex than the stupid civ v system or as i call it the civ v retardism

in conclusion: i have noticed many people who like civ v are ******** monkey children. just saying.

any thoughts? lets have intellegent and open debate here.

thnxttylbbbg2g

Moderator Action: Trolling is not acceptable on these forums, 2points

agreed, when I become king of the world Jon Shafer is the first to be shot in my purges.

Moderator Action: Threats of violence is unacceptable on these forums