| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,566
|
Hi everybody
![]() I wanted to start out an "old -> new" series here. Purpose is to show you what I do / did and for you to watch my greatness No, really, I suck atm. tbh, and purpose is for me and others to get better and not suck so much.The "Replay" has a history in the game of Fifa Manager, where I took some Clubs from the lowest leages to a "Tripple" of Champions League, Championship and Cup wins, sometimes even combined with the World Championship or the European Championship (if I was national trainer at that time) . The "Replay" once went as long as 50 Pages having more than 50k clicks in a forum, which can't be compared to this one, as it mostly consisted out of a handful of fanatic users, I guess it will be very different here, as there is way more knowledge about Civ than about Fifa Manager and there are way more users that can take part in this. I will only post games which got accepted in HoF for the moment, and most of them will be on Deity Huge Marathon 17 Civs settings, as that's what I'm trying to achieve atm. I will extensively try to keep my posts interessting for you, and I'm glad for anyone who participates in this series, as I want to learn, and as I will, others will too, and I'm sure this is gonna be a worthwile experience for lots of people, especially myself. There has always been only one rule in the Replays, and that is that "'You are all players!" (You won't disagree to that) . You can all say what you want, but try to be constructive instead of destructive. Purpose of this still is for me and others to learn and improve, aswell as to simply have fun with the game, not more, not less. REMEMBER: HAVE FUN!!! ----------- So here are the settings for the first round: I (We if someone wants to replay the starting save) play Mr. Imbaness Huanya Capac (remember, I'm still new to Civ and especially Deity and I'm playing for HoF purposes, so surely I pick a "strong leader", but as I will get better with this, I will try out others) . Oponements are: Bismark, Cyrus, De Gaulle, Elizabeth, Frederick, Hannibal, Lincoln, Mansa Musa, Joao II, Mehmed II, Napoleon, Peter, Ramsses II, Roosevelt, Suleimann, Victoria, Washington Aim of this, was not to take any Leader starting with Mysticism, so I can found Islam (yes, I took choose Religions and I'm a terrorist this time :P) and get a holy City 100% to fund my further warfare. Having a Shrine really helps a lot, and with 17 Civs on a Huge map, chances a low to conquer one, so I took this route. Furtheron, I left out any Leader being Protective, as I really tried them with HC, there is no fun in loosing 1/2 of all games because there is a Hills City with dual promoted Archers in it. In addition, I left out Aggressive leaders, as an early DoW can sacrifice the game completely. I certainly chose Mansa to be in the game, as he will always be in them, for being the only leader I know, who will trade Monopoly Techs away, another huge advantage. However, some of you might consider this choice of mine "lame", but remember, it's for HoF purposes, so choosing leaders and "making it easy for myself" is perfectly ok, and not choosing Mysticism / PRO / AGG leaders also comes with disadvantages, like having some of the strongest leaders like Hannibal or Elizabeth in it, and AGG leaders aren't that bad either imho. One can easily bribe them against others which is a big advantage, and, if one does know how to deal with them, it's usually another big advantage. It would also have been easier if I had chosen leaders like Ghandi or Justinian instead, but then again, founding an early religion wouldn't have been possible by 100% and then the game would have been a matter of the chance, if I was able to conquer a holy city from the first 3 Civs I'm going to smack into the ground, and I wanted to rule out that chance, as playing Huge Domination takes quite some time. I might however make up another game in time with even easier leaders, to get an even earlier finish date, though that will mean throwing away the majority of games because I simply started in the wrong corner, something which happens to often if playing Huge Pangea with 17 Civs. Also in addition, I ruled out Goody Huts, as they seem to help the AI more than oneself. On Deity, AI is starting out with two scouts, HC only has one slow moving Quechua, and I've seen it commonly, that one or two AI's get Writing, BW or even HBR by a Goody Hut early, something being able of changing a whole game. I left in random events, as I don't suppose they're that game changing and they can be quite funny sometimes, as a former MMO player who has played DAoC, Warhammer, AION and RIFT, I like the idea of questing in a strategy game, though I always hated questing in the MMO's and am more the "Grinder" type of person. ----------- Enough of the prelude: Here is the start! (Actually, I don't know how to include a picture here as I have no webspace available atm. so I guess you have to scroll down to the attachements to see it) . Questions: Did I reroll the start? Of course There is no need to play with a weak start if attempting for HoF, so of course, this start is good.What was I looking for, when creating the start? I was looking mainly for a plain Hills with a forrested plain Hills in the BFC, because that's what you need for the Quechua Rush. Plain hills gives 2 and forrested plain hills gives 3 so one is able to produce Quechuas in 6T. I tried out other good starts (sometimes I got as much as 5 Gems or something equal to that) but Quechuas every 7-8T is already luck dependent, as one can only attack the first target with 5-6 Quechuas instead of the 7 needed ones. A plain hill with a forrested plain Hill is a 100% safe way to get enough Quechuas for the first target, which will again be 7. 2 for every Archer he might have +1 for being extraordinaryly unlucky.What was I also looking for when trying to achieve a "good" start: Mainly I looked for a riverside Gold or Wine on which I can settle, getting me the plain hills production bonus +3 . Better would have been a Marble or Stone hill, but they are so extremely rare, that this start simply doesn't have one. I also looked for a 2nd LUX that can be worked early as Maintenance is a big problem with HC, conquering so many cities and having so many units. This start has Gems, which might be even better than a 2nd Gold due to the additional luxury ressource. In addition the start has enough food, so that the city can become a giant commerce city, ok, a dry corn + a FP isn't the best you can get, but nobody won't argue against this start being decent.If the start is underaverage or ueber with HC again is decided later, as it depends on what land you conquer, besides whom you start and other things like how many Quechuas do you loose which is RNG. This start fulfills the basics of having enough food, a plain hill to settle on, a forrested plain hill to be worked early and a 2nd LUX for City and Troop Maintenance. ----------- What did I do? Move the Warrior to NW to go scouting, as it was clear for me to settle on the Gold. Great City of Cuzco founded 3985 BC working the forrested plain Hills and going full Quechua production of 7 (!) Quechuas. I researched Meditation, again, remember the plan to make Cuzco the holy City of Islam and a supercommerce Capital. ----------- For the next part I have to reactivate my webspace, as I don't want to spoiler this map for anyone who wants to play it and I don't know how to include pictures in the spoiler-text with using the attachement function of this fourm, guess I'll need to link it from an URL. The starting save is attached, and there is more to follow soon, be prepared ![]() Till then, Seraiel |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Tribune of Rome
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,377
|
That's a sweet start. I'm eagerly subbing to see if I can learn something out of this. I could never get 640 AD domination on Deity...
__________________
BUG/BAT/BULL, I heartily recommend this for any cIV player who doesn't have it. If you've ever read D.J MacHale's Pendragon series, check out this mod by Radio Noer! Noble's Club, TMIT's Youtube Channel, Absolute Zero's Youtube Channel, three great resources to watch and play. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,566
|
Quote:
![]() And you will laugh at me when you will see the flaws I had in early game and think "if 640 AD is possible with such flaws, I will go for 640 BC!" ![]() My webspace will be up again tomorrow, then I will continue the story very fast, as it's already played till the end, so it will only take me the time of writing and making the screens, not actual playing which is the most part. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
GiftOfNukes
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 19,542
|
The difficulty here for most, including me if I have time for this one, will be adapting to the settings and adjusting for the intended VC. Domination is different on mara than normal, and different on huge than standard. Optimal unit choice can change, timings change, etc. To truly be competitive one must have enough practice with the settings or have an inordinate skill advantage.
__________________
- There is no "I" in team. There is no "we" either. There is a me. - Play Faster! - YouTube Civ Walkthroughs and Map Creation! - PolyCast Co-Host! Listen in! - Watch me play LIVE |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
WARLORD
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,279
|
Can't seem to get the save working even with the Buffy mod.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,566
|
Quote:
Works fine with my PC / Civ version. Do you have the latest Patch + the latest BUFFY and did you do whats told in the installation explanation? There are some steps vor Vista and other users one has to perform to get BUFFY running properly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pangea
Posts: 4,001
|
Hall of Fame could be renamed to Hall of cheese
![]() I would feel silly playing this, just to be on top of some ranking that isn't connected to playing skills ~~ It leaves out every aspect that makes Deity a challenge, normally. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Corporate Fatcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Corporate USA
Posts: 9,579
|
How the heck do you guys get these starts? How many times do you have to regen the map?
__________________
Sites I run for the good of humanity: Flash Games -- 10+ new free games each day Tower Defense Strategy Games |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,566
|
Quote:
Quote:
Spoiler:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pangea
Posts: 4,001
|
Quote:
you are starting to become boring, and in fact i won't comment your posts anymore if that is what you wish. But stop spreading false rumors, thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
GiftOfNukes
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 19,542
|
Quote:
.Hall of cheese my foot. The challenge in HoF is to out-play the other humans. Beating the AI is only a tiny stepping stone on that path. If you think HoF is all about cheese play, why don't you try beating some of the top submitters in HoF challenger or beating some of the deity times/gauntlets? There is a reason that the HoF crowd is competitive in games like SGOTM (though plastic ducks has been pretty dominant lately, the HoF crowd has been close) and players known mostly for play on that side of things have taken XOTM gold medals/etc (XOTM is one of the best pure-competition settings in existence, and Rusten's recent dominance there proves he's a top player...). Although it has some very poor settings allowed/disallowed in general play, HoF is nevertheless a legit competition and the better players *usually* do win. Anyway I think that most here who look down on HoF would struggle to make a serious dent in the tables, and would be hard-pressed to take all the #1 slots in the challenger series. Some of that is due to repetition, but a lot of it is that there is more skill than implied.
__________________
- There is no "I" in team. There is no "we" either. There is a me. - Play Faster! - YouTube Civ Walkthroughs and Map Creation! - PolyCast Co-Host! Listen in! - Watch me play LIVE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,566
|
Omg, there's a smiley behind the sentence... Actually I cannot even know if you look at the spoilers, or if you reload in ceratain situations, or whatever, actually I don't even care... All there is, is that you always start to belittle me and put yourself over me, perhaps you should think about that, but I guess that's just your sense of humor and I guessed you were negging. That was why I negged back and you get totally grave about it, that was neither my aim nor was it to stop you from making any comments about my posts, I like anybody who plays, I don't care how, purpose of playing is to have fun, everybody may have his / her fun the way he / she wants, be free, do what you want, but think one minute about what I said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pangea
Posts: 4,001
|
Quote:
That is a lie, you can make it look like a joke now, but we all know what you ment. And i also don't reload...who do you think you are? You are actually trying to put ppl like AZ down who play a map they already know for fun, making a video out of it. It's not me with the issues here, you keep arguing with guys like Ahcos who says Immortal rushes are hard to pull of on Deity, then "proof" him wrong by doing it on Marathon. Then you get offended when someone points out that you are not playing the standard settings for your cases, "belittling" you while we are just putting things into a perspective. Anyways iam done with this silly arguing, you are right it was truely my fault to make any commens about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
404 User. True form on.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,358
|
^
I like how you overlooked TMIT comment to storm Seraiel and just hammer more nails into him...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 6,066
|
@TMIT
as I found out HoF and SGOTM are great reminders about your own skillz ;-). One thing really annoys me at HoF though and that is the allowance of events and huts. That really skews the comparison. But enjoying the new challenges/gauntlets without them. Well the challenges...the settings lately are not that inspiring...everything quick speed or no vassals or some other not so nice thingys...makes me not want to play. The Minor 133 otoh... oh boy so much fun ;-) submitted already 3 attempts, the last one (1810) being by 150 years better then first one (1961)... Never thought that Enviromentalism and forest preserves could have such great use...At least for that i think it was worth the experiment... I would advise anyone to attempt that Minor, has high educational value imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pangea
Posts: 4,001
|
Quote:
TmiT likes to provocate people, i like him (a lot actually) but he is no angel so i don't feel like a i have to comment everything he writes to justify myself. There are a lot of things wrong with this forum, i have to be super careful with what i write, while others can rant and blame as they want. Maybe cos iam female, it's especially fun to get on my back isn't it. Well i don't need this i can tell you that much, so i'll take a long break and play my games just for myself again. HF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,566
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,566
|
Ok, as my webspace is online again, I can continue the story
I'm not so used to Spoiler-Tags, but will try my best ![]() Here are the the years 4000 BC until roughly 2000 BC: Spoiler:
If you made it to read the text and enjoyed it, I'm glad. I'm open to any suggestions, any comments, critique, questions, anything. Be prepared for the next post to follow soon, and I will, I promise, comply to your suggestions. Only thing I can't change is what I did, as it's already done ![]() Savegame of 1960 BC attached. Till then, Seraiel Last edited by Seraiel; Dec 01, 2011 at 10:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,566
|
Ok, after having played (and lost
) some other games, and after having slept a whole day after it, I'm rdy to continue this story. Hope you're in a good mood and will enjoy reading again.Here are the years 2000 BC to 500 BC! Spoiler:
Again, I hope you enjoyed the reading, again I will be happy for some feedback, as this was a lot of work. Btw, has anybody played the game yet? ![]() Savegame of 500 BC attached. Seraiel |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,566
|
Hi again
![]() After having played another round, where I topped the Score but not the finish Date, I'm rdy to continue the writeup of this round. I have to, because my next game, scoring #1 in HoF for Deity Huge has already been accepted, and I do wanna make a writeup of that also, as I'm still testing several things and took some different approaches in that game, you can be excited, next time I conquered a whole Huge Pangea in 500y! But lets stick to this game for the moment, what has happened: Spoiler:
And now come the years 500 BC - 1 AD! Spoiler:
I hope you again enjoyed reading, cya soon, Seraiel |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| deity, domination, huge, inca, marathon |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|