civnoob13
King
Is it a good idea to get the tradition opener (+3 culture) before going for liberty? The +3 culture doubles the rate of SPs (in comparison to +1 in liberty), so wouldn't it be actually faster to go there first to complete liberty?
I'd agree It'd be a tad silly to get it if you never manage to do other tradition policies, but the whole of Tradition itself is very tempting too. If you plan on getting some of both but want a settler rush, it is worth it?
Also a few more question. Is it stupid to found a city on a wheat resource and will you still get the +1 food with granary? Settling on luxuries or strategics effectively 'improves' them because you access the resource, do you get bonuses from that too?
There are way too many variables to calculate the effect of a tradition opener beyond a hundred turns, if that. It gets you to policies 2 & 3 faster, helps expand borders (perhaps getting a great resource sooner). Not taking it may help you finish Liberty sooner, but that is so far down the line that I do not think you can attribute any effect from taking Tradition first.
What is the minimum turns possible for finishing Liberty?
To be honest, there aren't any variables.
Start the same map twice, build the exact same stuff and don't build a second city.
The first time, you take the Tradition opener, second time you don't. Now you can obviously see which approach is better (or just search the forums for the math).
Remember, as soon as you build a 2nd city, the Tradition opener gets comparatively weaker because Liberty opener gives you +1 culture per city.
But again, even in an OCC scenario, the Tradition opener slows you down after your 3rd or 4th policy (I don't know off the top of my head).
Even on identical maps, there are lots of things that will affect culture production. Most basically, popping a ruin with either culture or faith. there is no "all things being equal" in civ games. I do not think you can say that opening Liberty first will always or even usually allow you to finish liberty faster than if you open tradition first then race to finish liberty.To be honest, there aren't any variables.
Start the same map twice, build the exact same stuff and don't build a second city.
The first time, you take the Tradition opener, second time you don't. Now you can obviously see which approach is better (or just search the forums for the math).
Remember, as soon as you build a 2nd city, the Tradition opener gets comparatively weaker because Liberty opener gives you +1 culture per city.
But again, even in an OCC scenario, the Tradition opener slows you down after your 3rd or 4th policy (I don't know off the top of my head).
What is always faster? Opening Liberty or finishing liberty?It is a horrible idea unless you were going to take it anyway. It is ALWAYS faster if you are just trying to go down liberty to take Liberty first. It makes sense if you aren't sure which tree you are going to do first, or decide you mght want to take the free culture buildings as your second policy or whatever, but just to take it when you are doing liberty is a bad bad bad idea.
Show me the math please.It slows you down immediately, from policy 1. Because you have to spend a policy on it. So yes you will get policy 2 MUCH MUCH faster, but it will still be slower than if you had just taken it directly (obviously because you would have gotten it when you took tradition), and it only gets worse after that. You will get any particular policy you are targeting slower than if you just went straight there (unless of course it was in the tradition tree, but then clearly you open with tradition).
Even on identical maps, there are lots of things that will affect culture production. Most basically, popping a ruin with either culture or faith. there is no "all things being equal" in civ games. I do not think you can say that opening Liberty first will always or even usually allow you to finish liberty faster than if you open tradition first then race to finish liberty.
Of course you can easily choose to finish liberty first, but that is not the issue. The issue is: does opening tradition first and then rushing liberty mean that it will take you longer to finish liberty? I say no, because there are too many in game variables that will affect how many turns it takes to get to select the final Liberty policy.Opening liberty first will in practice ALWAYS finish Liberty first. You would have to be playing an extremely odd way for it to not do so.
Of course you can easily choose to finish liberty first, but that is not the issue. The issue is: does opening tradition first and then rushing liberty mean that it will take you longer to finish liberty? I say no, because there are too many in game variables that will affect how many turns it takes to get to select the final Liberty policy.
Early game advantages can be very important. What's the value of having your first worker 50 turns earlier?
Some people in the strategy forum claim that Tradition and tall is now better than Liberty and wide. I was impressed when I saw a Russian space victory around T200 (no not vanilla) ostensibly going along these lines. After some tinkering myself I tend to think there is some credence to that - the +15% food and aqueducts are actually more powerful than they look.
But I find that opening Tradition then going Liberty to grab the free worker and settler to be a more plausible approach as you don't want it taken too late.
I thought there was a thread somewhere on the forum that went through all this in mathematical detail showing that, if you want to finish any tree other than Tradition, the fastest way was to pick the opener of the tree you want?
As I remember, Tradition opener speeds the first 2 or 3 policies, but after that, it works out that it would of been quicker to just go with whatever tree (Liberty usually) you actually wanted to finish?
I think you get the food from granery but I do not know if you lose the extra food wheat gives to the tile.