4-Player Conquest

I could do Rise Of Rome, as long as we all realize that Rome has a slightly unfair advantage. And if we pick up a fifth player someone is going to have a huge advantage.

Let's see who else joins us and which Conquest they want to play. If no one else posts by Thursday night, we can start a two-player Rise Of Rome game, possibly.
 
We could make the AI play Rome but any scenario is fine with me. Would like a third player, I'm in a 2-person game and a 4-person game now and would like to try a game with three.
 
I'm interested :)

Rise of Rome sounds good, although I'd also be interested in playing Fall of Rome since I haven't really tried that scenario yet (it seems kind of boring against the AI)..

My email is gonzo AT newmail DOT dk
 
Make the AI play Rome and we'll turn the rise of Rome to the fall of rome. ..oops, wifey just called me to dinner--gotta go!
 
Sounds okay by me. The Macedonians are between Rome and Persia which limits them a bit. Persia is a powerhouse in this scenario. Carthage is good if you like long, stringy empires, but they have the war elephant to make up for it, I suppose. The Egyptians are probably the weakest team. The Scythians and Goths are both probably good bets. Shall we wait for a another player so we can do 4 humans and 4 AI or go 3 human and ?? AI?
 
I'd really like to try the medieval counquest since I haven't tried that either.. Or the Fall of Rome, but that didn't seem to gather much interest. I've already played Rise of Rome twice to completion so I'm a little tired of that setup..
 
Middle ages is good. I've only played the first Conquest all the way through but am working on RoR myself (turn 65) and playing the Middle Ages PBEM with another fellow (turn 15). Any scenario is okay by me. We have four players so let's get started.
 
I can usually play around 15-20 and 22-02 GMT; if everyone tells their typical available playing times we can set up the chain so it moves around the quickest.
 
My usual time would be aound 6-8am PST (22-24 GMT) or 8-12pm PST (12-16 GMT). The latter would be better for me.

If I've got the times about right, how does this sound? It isn't great since it sounds like Rocinante and I want to play at about the same time, but I think I can stay up waiting for Portuga's e-mail if it comes later and get it out to Rocinate quickly.

10-17 Portuga
12-16 Deshelbr
13-17 Rocinante
22-02 Ironduck

I haven't even looked at the middle ages, but I'm up for playing it. If everyone is OK with this turn order, then just send me one more post telling me the folowing and I'll start the game and send it to Rocinante:

1) Nation - (Abbasids, Germany, Kievan Rus, Byzantines, France, England, Denmark, or Cordova)
2) Leader Name
3) Leader Formal Name
4) Civ Name Noun
5) Civ Adjective
6) Leader Formal Title
7) Leader Gender

Thanks!
 
Too cool, I can be the Danes! I've never played the vikings and I happen to be from Denmark, so I gotta try that! :D

As I mentioned I can also play earlier, so I should be able to send it back to Portuga so he can play again if we're lucky.. 2 turns a day would be great.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

mycophobia
Score Victory (idle theorycrafting)
Replies
11
Views
1K
<Nexus>
<Nexus>
Hickman888
The Greece Thread
Replies
5
Views
1K
trexeric
trexeric
T
conquest, new alliances
2
Replies
23
Views
1K
justanick
J
T
The AI Horatius League
2 3
Replies
41
Views
2K
Keler
Keler
Kurtbob
Exploration Age Victory is Underwhelming
Replies
9
Views
428
Yzman
Yzman
Back
Top Bottom