Should the next cities be part of Bohemia Provice? Citizen Discussion encouraged

FionnMcCumhall

FionnMcCumhall

Emperor
Joined
May 28, 2002
Messages
1,158
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
this is a discussion on weather or not to include the new cities in the current province or start a new one? ill post a poll once we get a good discussion going
 
That's a tough question to answer unless we know where the new cities will be built. I certainly think Valhalla should be part of Bohemia.
 
It's still early in game years, so not much has been discovered. Now we have an eastern, and possibly southern border.
 
I have created an initail proposal for our province borders.

provinceborderdiscussion1.jpg
 
This border proposal is very close to one I tried to post earlier, but was unable to 'cos i'm inept.
I think that in general the use of mountains for borders is realy good, especially when it creates such neat areas. I would however caution against the exterior borders used (ie the ones that define the outermost part of the province) IMHO these provinces are still a little small and will require tweakin when we know how our enemies lie.
 
I think that is a very nicely drawn out map. However, i disagree with the size of Bohemia. Since we will be building very tightknit, our provincial boraders should also be fairly tightknit. I would cut of the boundary of Bohemia at the gulf just above The Great Valhalla, and then go stright over to where the black starts. At the tile where it is forst and tundra, we should slant down to meet the vertex of Province 2 and Province 6. By the way, does the nameing of provinces follow the chain of command too?

The Great Iguanaman
 
I actually think Bohemia would look best as small as possible.
 
i think bohemia and province 6 should be combined, otherwise bohemia is too small. if you dont like that then at least extend bohemia a little more to the west up there.
 
our provinces need to be small, like maybe, three or four cities, we actually more. We should end this game with atleast, like 9-10 provinces. I think that my proposed boarder change should be the only change to Octavians map.

The Great Iguanaman
 
a province that small is a waste of a fine administrative staff, the larger the provinces are, the less staff we need for them which means a budget savings and the ability to pick only the finest people. no settling for second best just to fill vacant slots.
 
I have posted two rules that should be followed for provincial boarders. The are in the Dom. Minitry thread. If you agree with them, tell me, if not, tell me why and we can change them. It doesnt accomplish anything to holler back and forth. I understand your point NL, and it is very valid but you must understand the importance of having fairly small provinces. I think that the MAX amount of cities in a province should be 6. This way no one provincial govenor becomes too powerful or too week.

SOMEONE go elect me as the Turn chat rep for the Trade Ministry. I just need one more vote.

The Great Iguanaman
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

disjointaccount
Leader Discussion - Ada Lovelace
2
Replies
21
Views
1K
disjointaccount
disjointaccount
bengalryan9
Civ Discussion - Han
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
Nic@Melbourne
N
bengalryan9
Civ Discussion - Egypt
2
Replies
27
Views
1K
Lord Lakely
Lord Lakely
MutilationWave
Tell us the story of your current game
2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
sixty4half
S
Nikas Kunitz
Russia and Rus civilizations thread: suggestions and discussion.
Replies
7
Views
2K
Apple111111
A
Back
Top Bottom