disorganizer
Deity
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2002
- Messages
- 4,233
"Should the capitol 'province' be a province or should it be considered a district under rule of the domestic department?"
This is the question of this poll. Now how come? Many people complained about having a 1 city province being a waste of governmental material, and others say we should have the capitol province idea implemented as it was voted on.
And as such we searched for a solution to this which completely stays within the rules and allows us to not have to "waste" a governor for this sole city.
How could it work?
If we just and simply deny the "capitol province" its provincial status via this official poll, then that city is reverted under controll of the domestic department. All other provinces will still be normally controlled by governors.
Options:
* let it be a district under rule of the domestic department
* let it be a province with its own full qualified governor
* abstain
This poll is official and binding.
It was far prediscussed and proposedhere.
It will be up for 48 hours or until quorum reached, whichever comes last.
This is the question of this poll. Now how come? Many people complained about having a 1 city province being a waste of governmental material, and others say we should have the capitol province idea implemented as it was voted on.
And as such we searched for a solution to this which completely stays within the rules and allows us to not have to "waste" a governor for this sole city.
How could it work?
If we just and simply deny the "capitol province" its provincial status via this official poll, then that city is reverted under controll of the domestic department. All other provinces will still be normally controlled by governors.
Options:
* let it be a district under rule of the domestic department
* let it be a province with its own full qualified governor
* abstain
This poll is official and binding.
It was far prediscussed and proposedhere.
It will be up for 48 hours or until quorum reached, whichever comes last.