Science Discussion: getting out of the hole

DaveShack

Inventor
Retired Moderator
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Messages
13,109
Location
Arizona, USA (it's a dry heat)
We just discovered Literature, and are way behind everyone else, by design since we've been following a 40-turn min science path. There are now some areas to discuss:

  • Research Priorities
  • How to catch up (self research, trade, Great Library, force of arms)

This thread will discuss how to catch up. The candidate ways of research are
  • Self research (better be faster than 40 turns)
  • Trade (would work better if we had something valuable to give)
  • Build the Great Library and get a bunch of tech for "free"
  • Beat up our neighbors and accept tech in exchange for peace

Current information:
Code:
tech			10%	100%	=$ @70%
polytheism		40	15	21
map making		40	13	18
math			40	9	13
philosophy		40	7	10
code of laws		40	11	15

tech		min% for <40 turns
polytheism		50% = 23
map making		40% = 35
math			30% = 31
philosophy		30% = 23
code of laws		30% = 36

opponents

Greece: math, philosophy, code of laws, map making; does not need lit
Aztecs: math, philosophy, c.o.l., map making; does need lit
America: math, philosophy, c.o.l, map making; does need lit

Other trade stats
America have 11 gold and are willing to give Philosophy+11g for Lit
Aztecs have 26 gold and are willing to give Philosophy+10g for Lit

Notes:
  • If we do self research, the Domestic Dept sets the rate by setting the slider values, though Science should make a recommendation.
  • If we trade for tech, the Trade Dept handles the actual exchange.

Starting position for discussion

We are too far behind to catch up solely via self research, and would be in serious danger of getting pounded by more advanced neighbors who have production advantages due to advanced governments, or get to Knights a long time before us.

Trade as a source for tech looks pretty bad right now, there is only one tech we can give in a tech/tech trade, and it is low enough in value that we can only get one tech and ~10 gold. If we want to acquire tech via trade, we need to come up with something valuable enough to give.

The Great Library is risky because we don't have a really high production city combined with enough production elsewhere that we can afford to spare one and keep up in military.

A combined approach seems like the only way to go, so the draft approach to use is to do all of the following:
  • Start on TGL so that if our GA is triggered it will get the resulting boost. It is safe to start on this immediately as long as we don't go beyond the wasted shields point, if military production can keep up without the wonder city.
  • Research something the AIs don't have (Polytheism) at the maximum slider value that Domestic can support.
  • If the GL is pursued, do NOT give Lit in any trades until the GL is far enough along to not worry about another civ beating us to it.
  • If a Great Leader comes along, recommend rushing the Great Library, which will leave tons of gold available since science can then go to 0%.
  • In a separate discussion on government types, the general trend was leaning toward Monarchy as the 1st advanced gov. This backs up Polytheism as the self-research tech.
 
giving lit away is no problem, as greece already has it and they will propably trade it to the others anyway for low value. so why not use lit in trades?

and i wonder if one of the aztec/america duo is wantig to give something else than phylosophy for lit... could you check letting them both give col/math instead?
 
We should trade Lit to America and Aztecs. Then start the GL. I think that we will get a GA in this war so it is better to get the GL. It will put us back in the Tech Race quicker. Maybe we can try to start a war involving the other civs. It will slow the research down and we could get the GL before them.
 
I don't think we should build the Great Library unless we get a great Leader (I mean other than Shaitan :) ). Did Greece start building the GL?

I believe our best best is to move towards Monarchy. Now that we can build libraries :rolleyes: , we can begin to add them to all our Temples and increase our Science as well as our Culture. In the Monarchy, we will have an improved form of government that lends itself to a little war-mongering, which is where we find ourselves now.

I don't think trading is going to do us any good in the long run and I don't think we should trade Poly if we get it. Let's head for the possibility of The Hanging Gardens.
 
Originally posted by Cyc
I don't think we should build the Great Library unless we get a great Leader (I mean other than Shaitan :) ). Did Greece start building the GL?


What? I'm not a Great Leader? :p

I believe our best best is to move towards Monarchy. Now that we can build libraries :rolleyes: , we can begin to add them to all our Temples and increase our Science as well as our Culture. In the Monarchy, we will have an improved form of government that lends itself to a little war-mongering, which is where we find ourselves now.

I don't think trading is going to do us any good in the long run and I don't think we should trade Poly if we get it. Let's head for the possibility of The Hanging Gardens.

Trading DOES do wonders. In fact, with should look at the tech cost of each tech, and see how many civs have or don't have that tech. It's called tech devaluation. It's a way to get the upper hand in the tech race when you're behind.
 
I agree with Chieftess on the trading issue. Trading techs is very profitable in the long term - more so than attempting tech denial, which I only find useful for very short term goals such as limiting enemy defensive capabilities if I'm planning an invasion in the next few turns. I prefer to use trading alongside extortion though, so I'll usually try not to trade for those techs I expect to get in the near future from a vanquished enemy unless I have strong reasons to believe that my victim holds (and will be prepared to part with) techs even further down that branch of the research tree which I would not be able to afford to trade for in a normal manner.
 
:flamedevi Extortion I agree with. I just don't see us being a major trader here.
 
We need a new government, either monarchy or republic. We must decide which so we can work towards the goal of getting the needed techs to improve our government.

I would not bank on catching up via the Great Library. We can try for it but we must realize going into such a project that we may not get it. Therefore we must use the other means at our disposal. We are at war with Egypt. Can we expect any techs from this war? I think we should trade literature for another tech (or techs if possible). We should also seriously look into raising our research rate though currently the war calls for our gold.

BTW, I think the constitution states that leaders are responsible for the general areas under each department. It could well be argued that the science leader has the constitutional authority to set the science rate, despite traditions of past demogames.
 
re: tech slider. I would suggest setting the rate based on the tech we are researching at any given time. If we can research something in a minimal amount of time with research set as high as possible without budget deficit then it may well be worth doing so for that specific tech. Otherwise, greater efficiency will generally be achieved by keeping the sci rate to the minimum possible and the tax rate sky high.
 
Originally posted by donsig
We need a new government, either monarchy or republic. We must decide which so we can work towards the goal of getting the needed techs to improve our government.

See this thread for discussion on government type. Gov Type

Originally posted by donsig
I would not bank on catching up via the Great Library. We can try for it but we must realize going into such a project that we may not get it. Therefore we must use the other means at our disposal. We are at war with Egypt. Can we expect any techs from this war? I think we should trade literature for another tech (or techs if possible). We should also seriously look into raising our research rate though currently the war calls for our gold.
I agree that the GL is still a huge risk, so it's better to follow a mixed path where missing the GL doesn't mess us up forever.

Egypt has some techs that we need, so there is the chance that if we get the upper hand we'll be able to get something with the peace.

The trade opportunities listed in the 1st post are the only ones which don't cost us gold. A separate discussion might be what is our budget for science trade. I could see possibilities for lit to America for Philosophy+10g, and lit+some gold to Aztecs for Map Making, Math, or CoL, but need to know how much gold is available.

It's funny, we're saving gold for upgrades but at the same time trying to avoid a GA... ;)
 
d8575, thank you for you in-depth assessment of our Science options. This is exactly what I was hoping for from the Science Department. However, I feel that we should delay trading for Philosophy and few gold for the time being. Please let me explain why.

In talks with America and the Aztecs, I have found that both will part with either Mathematics or Code of Laws for Literature and a marginal payment on our part. Here's the lowdown:

Aztecs give Mathematics

We give Literature, 15g, 1gpt (35g total)

Aztecs give Code of Laws

We give Literature, 28g, 2gpt (68g total)

-----

America gives Mathematics

We give Literature, 10g, 1gpt (30g total)

America gives Code of Laws

We give Literature, 22g, 2gpt (62g total)

-----

As you can see, America offers the best deal on both trades. However, I believe that we should trade to both the Aztecs and the Americans using the gpt method. Here is my reasoning:

1. By using gpt instead of a full lump sum, there is a good chance that we can keep America and the Aztecs from signing an alliance with Egypt. A commitment of 1 or 2 gold is still a commitment, and these civs will most likely not want to ruin their reputation. If they do, we keep the remaining gold on the contract.

2. We can use Mathematics to build the ocassional Catapult.

3. We do not really need Map Making right now as we have no port cities.

4. We do not need Philosophy at the moment, as it seems we are more geared to head for Monarchy. Plus, I believe that making a deal to ward off a possible alliance is more important than 11 gold.

-----

I really don't care which tech we get from whom, but we can save 1g by getting Mathematics from the Aztecs and Code of Laws from the Americans.

Keep up the good work, d8575, and please let me know what you think.
 
BTW, I did check our Lump Sum opportunities for these trades and they would end up saving us about only 10g. Once again, a chance to keep other nations neutral far outweighs the small amount of gold.
 
I like the idea of trading to move up as opposed to going for a wonder that expires down the line. Don't get me wrong I like the GL, but we have to do something that answers short term needs as well as addressing our long term commtment to our own greatness.
 
Being several techs behind for a while in the mid-Ancient age is par for the course on Monarch. Not a reason to panic just yet.

Discovering one monopoly tech is usually enough to catch up, and so is giving a neighbor a good spanking in a war. Any ancient-age techs we don't have an immediate need for we don't need to get now... they'll be given to us essentially for free later.

In my experience on Monarch, currency has the best chance of not being researched by any of the AIs. Iron working and literature, the ones we've chased so far, the least ... polytheism would have worked nicely, had we not gone for literature first.

I'll have to hunt around the forum a bit more and see just why everyone wants to see us aiming for monarchy and not republic. Doesn't quite make sense to me if the victory goal isn't conquest...

I am already on record as not being too keen on the Great Library, but if we happen to get a leader I wouldn't object at all to its sudden appearance.
 
Back
Top Bottom