Originally posted by Cyc
donsig, if we don't have a Province, why do we have a Governor? JR this issue if you want, donsig. All of the land we have uncovered thus far IS the first Province, until we restrict the tiles used for Province 1 with borders.
too. But the fog is preventing us from setting up logical borders at this time.
Well, Cyc, the whole point of a JR on the issue would be to clarify things since out Three Books are not clear. Your interpretation is reasonable
but it is not the only reasonable interpretation. It is just as reasonable to interpret our laws in these two ways:
1) Since no provincial borders have been officially set there are no provinces, hence we have only at-large governors and the domestic minister (or whatever he's called in DGIV) *governs* the cities.
2) The first province is defined as the borders of our capital city with any subsequent cities being on no province (and hence under domestic control) until borders are formed.
I'm sure if I tried hard enough I could come up with even more
reasonable interpretations. I'm more than willing to request a JR on this but it seems we could discuss the matter, make a decision or three and set some sort of boundary. We could even do our best under the circumstances to be
logical about it, and then revisit the border situation when more info is at hand.
The key point here is we should be setting some provincial boundaries in advance of expansion
as called for in our laws. There is no reason for us to found a city without there being bno question whatever about which province it is in when founded!
I suggest we draw a north-south line through the hill with the gold. That's a six tile border. Everything east of the tile is our second province while anything west is our capitol province. We can then restrict these two provinces to their proper size after exploration.
Here's a current (2430 BC) map (note: the gold looks like a sea-shell thanks to the GOTM)
: