New money system for civ 4

So, do you like my idea (please explain)

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 21.1%

  • No

    Votes: 56 78.9%
  • Total voters
    71
oagersnap

oagersnap

Emperor
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
1,415
Location
South Schleswig
I have an idea for civ 4: When a unit popped a goody hut, the gold woudn't just be added to your money total, but instead, it woud be displayed in the right click drop down menu, and woud first be added to your total, when (or if) the unit woud reach one of it's own cities. Maybe it could even be made so, that gold you have in one of your cities couldn't be used in another of your cities, unless they were connected by road or port/airport. A technology in the modern ages called something like "electronic money" woud disable the "city transferring problem", as there woud exist no "real" money, but only "electronic" money.
 
You mean the currency (and also resources) should be localised, instead of globally available for the empire?

Sounds good for resources, but not for gold imo.
 
I mean that the gold that appears from goody huts and captured or razed cities would belong to a unit. The unit can then add the gold to a city, and that gold (and the gold that is produced in the city) can then be traded betweeen any cities that are connected to that city.
 
Sure, it might be realistic, but I'm afraid it would make things more complicated without adding much to the game in terms of fun.
 
i've been thinking of a similar system for maps, but since the human player sees the entire map as it's explored, it wouldn't make much sense. i half-hearditly suport your idea, but for the sake of realsim....WAIT i just realized something! this means we could take money in battle! each unit has a certain monetary value assigned to it (based on the shield cost of the unit) and a victorious unit in battle could take that money, and if he keeps winninge, he'll have a large amount of gold on him and be a larger target for enemy attacks. this could be interesting, however, if not implemented correctly can virtually (no pun intended) destroy the game
 
I also don't like it. The money you get has not a big role, and therefore it might be too complicated for doing not much.
 
It would simply take too long every turn to have to move gold around the map. In the age of discovery campaign it was already annyoing to have to spend your entire military and navy for the purpose of moving treasure around the map.
 
ahhh so it's kinda like the Princess in the game "Three Sisters" and you must return it to a city connected to your captial?

BRILLIANT!
 
No offense, but it's pointless. It doesn't really add much to the theme and playability of the game. It goes along well with colonization but that was a different game.
 
Too complicated and not of much value IMHO.
 
Originally posted by ybbor
each unit has a certain monetary value assigned to it (based on the shield cost of the unit) and a victorious unit in battle could take that money, and if he keeps winninge, he'll have a large amount of gold on him and be a larger target for enemy attacks.
Click to expand...

This would turn the game into Monty Haul.
 
it's just like in magesty, ever play that game?
 
it requires too much micromanagement while it doesnt add strategy thinking to the game
 
Originally posted by judgement
without adding much to the game in terms of fun.
Click to expand...

I disagree..
If this were to be implemented, the payout should be a lot bigger though - not only 25 as it is today. Perhaps 150 or something - or even more!

I can't believe you say it wont be fun - imagine trying to protect your scouts to avoid them getting ambushed! And also try to go after the enemy scouts, and if you manage to kill them, your unit get the gold isntead :D
Kind of similar to the Barbarian Leader in Civ2 (or was it Civ1?), where if you hunted him down you got some extra gold.

Would add some more depth to the game, I think it's an awesome suggestion :)
 
oagersnap said:
I have an idea for civ 4: When a unit popped a goody hut, the gold woudn't just be added to your money total, but instead, it woud be displayed in the right click drop down menu, and woud first be added to your total, when (or if) the unit woud reach one of it's own cities. Maybe it could even be made so, that gold you have in one of your cities couldn't be used in another of your cities, unless they were connected by road or port/airport. A technology in the modern ages called something like "electronic money" woud disable the "city transferring problem", as there woud exist no "real" money, but only "electronic" money.
Click to expand...

This presumes that unit movement are realistic as well - but they arn't. I know the Roman Legions weren't all that speedy (12-15 miles per day), but it took me about 40 years to move one legion from Carthage to Alexandra in the Rise of Rome scenario! The movement rates arn't realistic at all - the game is played on a huge macro level, but moving units is micromanagement. Perhaps when war is declared, you set targets for your built units to achive and you are notified whether they are achived in 2-3 turns time, given your army/navy size and deployed positions. There could be an alternative option to switch to a 'micromanagement' level that would allow you to move the units in a way similar to that of 'classic' civ but in a much smaller time frame - and in this framework your rule would make sense. This is possibly a new thread though I'd love to hear peoples comments on a 'micromanagement/macromanagement war' system.
 
atomicgopher said:
It would simply take too long every turn to have to move gold around the map. In the age of discovery campaign it was already annyoing to have to spend your entire military and navy for the purpose of moving treasure around the map.
Click to expand...

But that is what the Spanish had to do - moving the gold back from the mines was a huge yearly task that required all of Spain's huge naval power, to avoid the English or the Dutch (or someone else) nicking the loot!
 
Ah, but remember, each turn takes fifty years at the beginning, and the scale never drops below two years per turn. This is realistic for many game function, especially technology, but not for military purposes. You are left to assume that your Warriors send you a messanger occasionally to tell you about the terrain. Presumably, said messanger also brings any barbarian plunder you get.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Feature requests for Civ VII
2
Replies
22
Views
1K
MutilationWave
MutilationWave
W
Civ Rev for Civ VII - Rise and Fall
Replies
0
Views
246
wuTz
W
U
Romanian civilization path ideas (Civ VII)
Replies
1
Views
529
ibnu
I
M
Antiquity and Exploration Age Victory Projects
Replies
2
Views
556
Krikkit1
K
T
Civ 8 And Commanders/1UPT/Doomstacks
Replies
1
Views
382
MutilationWave
MutilationWave
Back
Top Bottom