zyxy
Warmongering Fool
At this moment our great nation finds itself on the verge of mobile warfare. While swordsmen are still the most powerful attackers we have (soon to be replaced by even more powerful MDI's), technological advances for improved mounted units are just around the corner, so to speak. Our attack forces can also potentially benefit from artillery support, and defensive units for protection.
With -- in all probability -- quite a bit of warfare in the near future, this leads to the question what the forces composition of our armies should be. What mixture of swords/horses/catapults/spears (or their various upgrades) do we want? How should this evolve over time?
Discuss away!
--------------------------------------------------------
The current policy of the CoAF can be found here.
Disclaimer:
I realize term 3 hasn't started yet, and I am hoping that our legal brains will not tear me apart for this - I meant no offense (pun intended).
With -- in all probability -- quite a bit of warfare in the near future, this leads to the question what the forces composition of our armies should be. What mixture of swords/horses/catapults/spears (or their various upgrades) do we want? How should this evolve over time?
Discuss away!
--------------------------------------------------------
The current policy of the CoAF can be found here.
Disclaimer:
I realize term 3 hasn't started yet, and I am hoping that our legal brains will not tear me apart for this - I meant no offense (pun intended).