Defeat from Victory: the Diadochi in Iran, 318-6 BC(E)

Dachs

Hero of the Soviet Union
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
32,588
Location
Moscow
Introduction

Immediately after the death of Alexander the Great, his generals fell to division of the spoils, namely an empire that stretched from Greece to Egypt to the Indus River, the family of Alexander himself (valuable pawns in the power struggle to ensue), and the army that had made it all possible. At Babylon, a somewhat equitable settlement was reached between the three most important players: Antipater, regent in Europe and commander of a large army; Craterus, commander of the Cilician army and navy, which had been tasked to prepare for an invasion of Carthage; and Perdiccas, the head of the cavalry, who had seized control of the events at Babylon and come out on top. This settlement was rather ignominiously destroyed by the events of the next few years. Athens rose up violently, with allies, and sparked a conflict in Greece itself, the Lamian War; Perdiccas was then beset by a coalition of allies including Craterus (who died in the fighting), Antipater, and the satraps of Phrygia and Egypt, Antigonus ("Monophthalmus", or the One-Eyed) and Ptolemy respectively. At Triparadeisus they enshrined a new settlement, in which Antigonus was effectively made lord of Asia and the satrapies rearranged in Antipater's and Antigonus' favor.

But one of Perdiccas' supporters, and a supporter of the legitimate heir to the throne of Alexander, held out. Eumenes of Cardia, former secretary of Alexander, was not a Macedonian, but a Thracian Greek; he had not held a general's post and was thus a relative newcomer to the power games and strategy that wracked the former high command. But he proved his acumen at the Battle of the Hellespont against Craterus, who had been the most able of Alexander's subordinates, whereat he not only slew Craterus' second in command, Neoptolemus, but succeeded in driving back Craterus' army, aided in this doubtlessly by Craterus' accidental death. Eumenes, after the assassination of Perdiccas by Ptolemy and a few of Perdiccas' officers, was on the run with only a few men. It was truly ironic that an undefeated supporter of the legitimist camp would be labeled an outlaw by the rest of the Macedonian Empire. But outlaw he was, and only last-second negotiations succeeded in turning away Antigonus' wrath.

This is the story of Eumenes' subsequent meteoric rise and fall, which takes us deep into the salt desert of central Iran, a story of unparalleled generalship and heroic warriors, and of hidden machinations and vile betrayal, involving a cast of characters from places spread thousands of miles apart.

The Resumption of War

Antipater nominally held the supreme command and Regency of the Empire after the settlement at Triparadeisus. His impotence was shown very rapidly. He was unable to trap Eumenes in a series of Anatolian campaigns, and thus left the job to Antigonus, who was given a vastly enlarged satrapy in which to conduct his anti-Eumenes campaigns. In 319 Antipater retired to Europe to waste away the last few months of his life at Pella, where he died in the fall. Immediately the attention of all devolved onto the Regency. It had been expected by many that Antipater would be succeeded by his son, a bloodthirsty little tyrant named Cassander, but Cassander was to be disappointed; instead, Polyperchon, an old war buddy of Antipater's, was the designated successor. Cassander fled to Asia Minor in a rage and brooded at the satrapal palace of Antigonus in Celaenae. Antigonus, recognizing an easy ally, wined and dined him and encouraged his rebellious attitudes, then in the spring of 318 sent him back to Greece with a sizable warchest and a small army, to raise a rebellion against the new Regent.

Eumenes, in the meantime, had been pardoned by Antigonus, a gesture that was accepted by the remainder of the army, so for now he was on the market. He did not remain a free agent for long; Polyperchon, recognizing that he needed allies, sent to him promises of a supreme, official, royal-approved command in Asia, authority to use Alexander's best troops, and the right to receive monies from the treasuries in Asia. This title of strategos autokrator came with an implicit assumption that Eumenes would become the potential successor to Polyperchon as Regent, assuming that Eumenes performed his duties in the coming coalition war well. In any event, Eumenes took the job, and sent orders to the Argyraspides, the Silver Shield pikemen of Alexander, who were billeted in Susiana, in the southern Zagros. They were to march to Cilicia and join up with him at once. Cassander's war was rapidly spreading...

The second War of the Diadochi was heating up. While Cassander moved through the Peloponnese, seeking support from the oligarchic elites, Polyperchon marched south to counter him, ironically espousing the cause of democracy. Antigonus was moving to join him, but was held up by the annoyance of the satrap Arrhidaeus, who ruled Hellespontine Phrygia and thus held the key to the passage between Europe and Asia. Arrhidaeus, aided by the admiralship of Cleitus the White, proved a very annoying thorn in Antigonus' side, and difficult to reduce. Ptolemy, the de facto independent ruler of Egypt, was also allied to Antigonus, and marched north to protect his claim on Syria, a claim which had resulted from a highly illegal displacement of the previous satrap following Triparadeisus.

In any event, the battle lines were drawn in the Eastern Mediterranean, and Eumenes needed to act quickly. This he managed quite well, for Arrhidaeus bought him critical time. By the time Antigonus was ready to turn back east in the early summer of 318, Eumenes had the Silver Shields at his side, and a sizable army, hired by money from the treasury of Cyinda in Cilicia, from which only he, as royal general, could draw. It was with this force that he successfully faced down Ptolemy, who sailed to the coast of Syria and attempted to incite insurrections in his army. But Ptolemy's tactic failed, and Eumenes took advantage of his opponent's failure to detach Syria and Phoenicia from the Egyptian hold.

Phoenicia was what really spurred Antigonus onward. With command of that ancient coastal district, Eumenes could construct a sizable fleet, and that would be able to menace Antigonus' communications with his protege Cassander. Clearly this occupation needed to be reversed, and this annoying thorn in his side eliminated, and so Antigonus marched east at the head of his great army in the late spring of 318. Antigonus, following the Treaty at Triparadeisus, had command of the largest single army in the Empire, and Eumenes was clearly outnumbered. He needed to retreat somewhere: but where? Europe was where his ally Polyperchon was engaged in inconclusive maneuvering against Cassander, but that passage was barred by Antigonus. The only other option was eastwards, and that path did indeed offer some interesting possibilities. A power struggle was ensuing between the leaders of the Upper Satrapies of Iran and the overweening (and strong) satrap of Media, Peithon, whom Antigonus supported. East also lay the home ground of Eumenes' Silver Shields, and the resources of the royal treasury at Susa. With the Upper Satraps, led by Peucestas, lord of Persis, behind him, Eumenes might be able to beat Antigonus and return to the west.

Journey to the East

Eumenes' move toward the East was coincident with missives from him to the Upper Satraps, detailing his plans and indicating a course of action. It was partly on the basis of this promised support, and also because of internal diplomacy, that the Satraps struck in the summer of 318 BC(E). Peithon, who had occupied the satrapy of Parthyaea, was suddenly set upon by Peucestas with an army of 20,000 men, with an additional reinforcement from the Cathaean rulers of the Indus River valley, consisting of some 120 elephants. The Cathaeans had displaced Porus, who had been made ruler of the northern Punjab by Alexander after the Battle of the Hydaspes; their cohort, Porus' Greek generalissimo Eudamus, was made to represent their positions in Iran, and it was he, along with the prince 'Ceteus' [1], who proved decisive against Peithon, breaking the enemy army with the elephants and seizing control of Parthyaea.

These elephants would be a prize too great to ignore, and it was probably these that spurred Eumenes to new speed as he crossed the Syrian desert towards Babylonia. By winter he had reached Babylonia, and camped not far from Opis itself. He took this opportunity to attempt to gain Seleucus' support. Seleucus, who had been made satrap of Babylonia, was recalcitrant. He owed his position to Antigonus and believed that the Phrygian satrap would win out in the end anyway. Instead of allying with Eumenes, he sent agents to try to detach the Silver Shields from the enemy army, but (as Ptolemy and Antigonus did) he failed. When winter ended Eumenes was back on the march east again, this time skilfully negotiating the river at Opis with the aid of a small fleet of boats that Alexander had had constructed nearly a decade earlier. The river crossing was nearly ruined by Seleucus and Peithon; the former opened up a canal which cut off the Silver Shields' baggage, and the latter sent out several parties of cavalry to harass Eumenes' army. Securing the precious baggage train of the Silver Shields, in which were carried not only the booty of the decade of conquest under Alexander, but also the soldiers' home effects and families, was paramount, and Eumenes only narrowly managed to get the entire load across before Peithon intervened.

By the early summer of 317 Eumenes had reached Susiana, and temporary safety. Here his men could rest and replenish their supplies, and he could gain monies from the Susa treasury, whose head Xenophilus was more than willing to disburse cash to the royal general. (When Eudamus and Ceteus joined up with the elephant corps, Eumenes made sure to award them 200 talents to victual the expensive beasts. In addition, he gave his soldiers six months' advance pay and settled their arrears.) But Antigonus was on his tail. Marching through Mesopotamia to Babylonia and making contact with his unexpected new ally Seleucus, Antigonus launched a recruiting drive to offset the advantage Eumenes had due to his control of the Silver Shields. This gained him several thousand men but lost him the support of the satrap of Mesopotamia, Seleucus' neighbor Amphimachus, who also happened to be the brother of King Philip III, the mentally unstable half-brother of Alexander who sat impotent in Pella while Polyperchon hashed out affairs down south. Amphimachus took his personal satrapal army and fled to Eumenes during the summer of 317, further boosting the general's royalist credentials and his popular support amongst his army.

But in the fall, Antigonus began moving east again, impelled by the wealth that could be had if Susa were to fall and by the clear and present danger Eumenes represented to his ambitions in Asia. Eumenes' plan of resistance was well thought out and considered, and was a product of discussions in Alexander's personal tent amongst his allies and subordinates, including Antigenes and Teutamus, commanders of the Silver Shields, Peucestas, and Eudamus. Since an open field battle would be risky at this point, Eumenes' council's consensus went to a logistical and delaying strategy. Susiana was low in forage and the late-summer climate was viciously hot. Pulling back from Susa, which was well defended and whose citadel would be able to resist any immediate assault, Eumenes placed his army on the Pasitigris River and awaited new developments. When Antigonus attempted to cross the Coprates, further west, Eumenes saw an opportunity to strike, and managed to catch ten thousand of Antigonus' men unprepared and wipe them out with scarcely any casualties, taking 4,000 prisoners. The legitimist army then pulled away again before Antigonus' main force could cross the river and respond in kind.

Antigonus had been stymied at the Coprates but he had other options left. While Seleucus halfheartedly maintained a siege at Susa, he could move through the Zagros to the northeast, link up with Peithon's main army in Media, and boost his numbers to surpass those of Eumenes once more. The problem with the Zagros road was that it passed through the land of the Cossaei, who were known for fierce independence and who had fought Alexander (unsuccessfully) during his passage through the area in 331. Antigonus failed to negotiate with the tribesmen and thus was forced to endure a series of blistering assaults, light-warfare stings that exhausted his army and forced it to endure many casualties. When his army finally limped into Media in the early winter of 317-6, morale was at its nadir. But he had gained the safety of Peithon's districts, and could rest, recuperate, resupply, and rearm. Antigonus had pulled off a masterful maneuver, despite its major faults, and had turned the tables on Eumenes.

The Battle of Paraitacene

Eumenes followed Antigonus by another route into Media, avoiding the Cossaean problem and reaching the highlands without incident, save for a brief episode during an illness of his. Upon his rapid recovery, the divisions within the army - the natural divisions that one might expect from commanding a coalition force - were papered over and the march continued. Near modern Isfahan, the two armies began to maneuver against each other, the usual courtship-dance before the relationship was consummated in a big, bloody battle. Antigonus had a preponderance in cavalry but on the whole had fewer numbers than his opponent: 28,000 infantry to Eumenes' 35,000, and 9,000 horse to Eumenes' 6,100. Eumenes also had a two-to-one advantage in elephants.

The field of battle that separated them could only be called a 'field' very loosely. At Paraitacene the ground was crisscrossed with ravines and valleys, extremely uneven terrain that would play havoc with formations and which thus helped keep the two camps separate for a few days. After those few days, though, forage began to run out, exacerbated by the problem of being on the edge of the great Iranian salt desert in the opening days of winter. Eumenes, with the larger army, needed to resolve the problem first, and with a secret departure at nighttime managed to steal a march on Antigonus. The Phrygian satrap settled on a devious stratagem to prevent Eumenes from gaining good ground and forage: he rode ahead with his cavalry, trying to give the impression that his entire army was with him, and thus occupied a hill in Eumenes' path while the remainder of his army moved up. In the meantime, Eumenes' infantry advantage was whittled down by detachments and supply deficiencies. So going into the first major tactical encounter, he was at a disadvantage in both men and ground.

On the day of battle, Eumenes formed his army up in the typical Macedonian manner, with the infantry organized into the Philippic syntagma and echeloned to the left rear. On the right wing, he placed himself, at the head of his personal cavalry agema [2]; the right cavalry wing was much stronger than the left, because Eumenes wanted to concentrate his forces there to have a chance of beating Antigonus there. At the rightmost part of the infantry line, the Silver Shields under Antigenes took their place, the vanguard of the army; the remainder of the line was made up of the satraps' troops, second-line units and native levies armed with pike. Peucestas was in command there. On the left wing, Ceteus and Eudamus were in charge of the cavalry, as well as the elephants, which were concentrated on the left wing of the army. Eumenes hoped that his elephants would be able to make up for the quality and quantity deficiencies on the left wing.

Antigonus' dispositions resembled more than anything a giant guillotine blade, pointing downhill towards the static force of Eumenes; his right wing cavalry was placed at the apex of a great triangle, echeloned to the left rear as well (and thus mirroring Eumenes' army). Peithon was given command of the left-wing cavalry. Antigonus also made sure to keep his Macedonian elements of the infantry line away from the Silver Shields, for there was no guarantee that the Macedonians would fight each other; they certainly hadn't at the Battle of the Hellespont, where only the cavalry contingents (made up of Eastern horsemen) had engaged. He also made sure to counter Eumenes' concentration of heavy cavalry on the legitimist right wing with units of light skirmisher cavalry to aid Peithon.

Antigonus was supposed to have opened the battle, charging downhill to the tune of the paean and slicing a path through Eumenes' army; nothing of the sort happened. Instead, it was Peithon who moved first, because Antigonus, having marched downhill some ways, was stymied. The elephant detachment that guarded the legitimist left wing was indeed sufficient to halt the enemy in their tracks, for Antigonus' elephants were inferior beasts to these well-trained and maintained war pachyderms. Only Peithon, therefore, could move forward, and move forward he did, harassing Eumenes' cavalry with horse-archer fire. It was then that Eumenes managed the maneuver that had eluded Porus at the Hydaspes, namely that of moving his cavalry round behind his infantry to concentrate the entire force effectively; Peithon's horsemen were shattered by weight of numbers and the Median satrap was ignominiously forced to flee. In the meantime, the two titanic infantry formations clashed. It was here that Eumenes' Silver Shields showed their true worth. Every man had fought for Alexander, had marched across the known world, had defeated many times their number in opponents. The levies of Antigonus could not match up, and when the two troop masses clashed the Silver Shields tore through their opponents with precision and a grim, machinelike skill. Antigonus' phalanx collapsed all along the line and fled in disorder up the hill, pursued by Eumenes' infantry. It was at this point that Antigonus managed to rescue his situation somewhat. The advance of the phalanx had left the left-flank infantry somewhat disordered and exposed, and far away from the cavalry and elephants under Ceteus and Eudamus on the extreme left. Seizing his chance, Antigonus led his cavalry and fragments of the best of his infantry against the allied left, which collapsed. He then withdrew, satisfied with the damage he had wrought. Both sides retired to their camps with the onset of nightfall not long afterward; Eumenes' soldiers were more insistent than Antigonus', being rather worried about the baggage train, so Antigonus was left with possession of the field for a few more hours - a hollow victory, considering the serious damage he had sustained.

So Eumenes had to all intents and purposes won the first round. Antigonus had been unable to crack his army despite numerical superiority, and even the attack on the left wing at the end had not inflicted many casualties. The only remotely successful element of the whole episode for Antigonus had been his possession of the field of battle, which he used to complete his pious duties in burying his troops. Eumenes was not able to do so until later, and so Antigonus had a head start on him, allowing him to escape to Media and Peithon's sanctuary.
 
Dissension in the Camps

Events from the West now took their chance to intervene in the campaign in the East. Polyperchon had been worsted in the 318 skirmishing, and Cassander had seized Athens and the Piraeus, as well as several elephants in a raid on the royal stables at Pella. Without consulting the regent, Queen Eurydice, wife of Philip III, had seen fit to transfer Eumenes' title as royal general to Cassander, due to his successes. Briefly forced from Macedon in 317, Polyperchon allied with Alexander's mother, Olympias of Epirus, and with her army wiped out Eurydice's adherents. Olympias' resultant bloody reign of terror saw Philip III and Eurydice both put to death, and Alexander IV, son of Alexander the Great, placed on the throne. Cassander was forced back into the Peloponnese, and Olympias had Eumenes reinstated. But the lines of communication with Iran were long, and Seleucus blocked the way, preventing any morale-boosting information from reaching Eumenes' camp. All Eumenes' men were aware of was the renunciation of his position as royal general, and the disaster that had briefly befallen Polyperchon; dissent was beginning to seethe in the camp.

This dissent was, however, somewhat mitigated by Eumenes' possession of the rich district of Gabiene in which to provision his men over the winter, a prize he had won due to Antigonus' withdrawal after Paraitacene. Antigonus was stuck in Gamarga, to the north, and thus his men were comparatively badly off, especially since their numbers were swelled by reinforcements from the west and from Peithon. Even in Gabiene, however, there was not enough fodder to allow Eumenes to keep his army concentrated; the men needed to be somewhat spread out, to keep any area from being devastated over the winter. Antigonus, however, had informants who made him aware of these dispositions, and elected to try to take advantage of them by a daring march across the great khavir between Gamarga and Gabiene. On the salt desert, temperatures sometimes plummeted below freezing, a situation exacerbated by the fact that Antigonus' original instructions were not to light any fires, so that Eumenes would not be able to see the army coming. But the elephants that remained with Antigonus' army were not well disposed to the cold, and they needed warmth; in the end, Antigonus consented to making fires, and it was these fires that let Eumenes have advance knowledge of his opponent's onward rush.

Eumenes had two choices. He could keep his troops scattered and withdraw into the Zagros mountains. Each onward step would become another Cossaei incident for Antigonus, and the Phrygian satrap would clearly be forced to retire soon. Peucestas, the satrap of Persis, who was fighting on home ground, advocated this plan, which received some support from the other Upper Satraps. Eumenes had other ideas, though. It was his plan to mimic Antigonus before, and seize advantageous ground with a cavalry party, allowing the rest of his army to marshal for another set-piece battle. Antigonus was fooled into halting and allowing his men to resupply, and Eumenes' army successfully coalesced for battle...with one hitch. The elephants of the army had had to be stationed further away from the rest, due to the fodder that they consumed, and thus took longer to reach the fortified camp Eumenes established to receive his army. Antigonus caught wind of the delinquent pachyderms and launched an expedition to intercept them, hoping to destroy one of Eumenes' two advantages at a stroke. Eumenes sent a rescue party to save the animals, and none were lost, but the Antigonid attackers had inflicted some wounds and overall the elephants' tempers cannot have been good.

The Battle of Gabiene

Antigonus had some five thousand infantry less than Eumenes, and only half his elephants; his advantage, once again, lay in cavalry, 9,000 to 6,000, the difference being made largely by horsemen trained in the 'Tarantine' manner - light cavalry. His dispositions, from the rather vague notes in Diodorus, seem to have been a repeat of those at Paraitacene. Eumenes also adopted a similar scheme to the previous battle, but with one key alteration, introduced when he caught wind of Antigonus' tactical planning: he transferred the bulk of his cavalry to the left wing, to counter Antigonus' advantage there, as well as his own person, to keep watch on the discontented satraps. A Philippus, a loyal man who had served with Eumenes over the past five years and commanded men at the Hellespont, was placed in charge of the right wing, which was composed of weaker troops and was defensively oriented.

Before the engagement commenced, Eumenes was rewarded with an excellent piece of propaganda. Antigenes, commander of the Silver Shields, rode out in the gap between the two armies, and harangued the Antigonid infantry with the insistent slogan: "You are sinning against your fathers, you degenerates: the men who conquered the world under Philip and Alexander!" Reminding the Silver Shields of their own inherent superiority was a great morale booster, and the levies Antigonus had, none of whom had served in Alexander's campaigns, saw their own morale plummet. In order to keep things from getting any worse, Antigonus actually began the battle this time, as his cavalry wing raced across the open salt desert towards Eumenes' men, stirring up a great cloud of dust in the process. It was now that the decisive move was made. The light cavalry of Antigonus, the 'Tarantines', were under prior orders to seize the legitimists' baggage, and under cover of the dust they swept around Eumenes' flanks toward the camp and the Silver Shields' baggage. While the armies engaged, the cavalry transferred the gold and human contents of the camp to the Antigonid side, and then rejoined the combat.

Meanwhile, on the flanks, the elephants were engaging. It was the first of this type of event in classical history, with single combat between beasts in addition to elephants plowing into the enemy ranks. But our sources on the substance of the fight are relatively scarce; Diodorus, for example, summarizes the whole thing as sunepse de ten machen men ta theria. So for a description we must rely on Polybius' account of Raphia: "With their tusks firmly interlocked they shove with all their might, each one trying to force the other to give ground, until the one who proves strongest forces aside the other's trunk, and then, when he has once made him turn and has him in the flank, he gores him with his tusks as a bull does with his horns." This engagement turned decidedly in Eumenes' favor, in sharp contrast to the fight on the left wing. Eumenes' satrapal allies, already infuriated by the decision to fight at Gabiene, deserted him, and he could not hope to match Antigonus' numbers. After a brief forlorn-hope charge, to try to kill Antigonus as he had slain Neoptolemus at the Hellespont, he conceded defeat and withdrew to the other flank, to reinforce Philippus and try to win a victory at least somewhere.

The infantry fighting was a rerun of Paraitacene, except with an even greater imbalance. Once more the Silver Shields moved forward, and led the infantry in an all-out assault on Antigonus' men; once again they swept all before them, with not a single casualty among the Silver Shields themselves, compared to five thousand of Antigonus' men. Their morale was weak and the phalanx was already weakened by the losses from Paraitacene; Antigonus' phalanx was thus easy prey for Eumenes' pikemen, who annihilated their opponents and sent them fleeing. It was now that Eumenes once more evoked Alexander, calling out to his phalanx to attack the enemy camp. Just as at Gaugamela, his men had lost their baggage; now they could reclaim it, and seize the enemy camp along with it. But this was not to be. Peucestas withdrew even further from the field, and was followed by the rest of his satraps; Antigonus thus had a superiority in cavalry, and used it to prevent the Silver Shields from linking up with Eumenes and his elephants. Nightfall forced Eumenes to return to his despoiled camp, with no prize, and allowed Antigonus to escape.

Aftermath

To all intents and purposes, the whole thing was over. Eumenes' command was totally undermined by the satraps' betrayal, and even Antigenes and Teutamus, the Silver Shields' commanders, who were typically among Eumenes' staunchest supporters, were disinclined to go out on a limb for the Greek now that their families and possessions were in the hands of the enemy. Even though Eumenes now had a total advantage over Antigonus, and could easily win any subsequent engagement, there was to be no such engagement. The rank and file Silver Shields sent to Antigonus with requests for the return of their baggage, and were met with assurances that their families would be given back as soon as Eumenes was turned over to Antigonus. The satraps and the Silver Shields soon handed Eumenes over to imprisonment and eventual death. Antigenes, the Silver Shields' Macedonian commander, was also surrendered, and Antigonus had him burned alive. The entirety of Eumenes' remaining army was absorbed by Antigonus, who now had the cream of Alexander's old army as well as a numerical preponderance over all of the other Diadochi; his forces numbered over 50,000 infantry and 12,000 cavalry.

The Silver Shields were too dangerous to be kept together as a group, but at the same time too valuable to simply lose. Antigonus incorporated most of them into his army, settled many others in the East, and sent the troublemakers to Sibyrtius, his pet satrap of Arachosia, who would end up losing most of them. It has been asserted that Sibyrtius was under orders to totally break up the Silver Shields, but this is mostly unfounded, and unlikely to boot. The best soldiers in the world were not something to be thrown away lightly.

As for the most exotic of Eumenes' army contingents, the Indians, a most interesting sequel is recorded. For Ceteus had fallen in battle at Paraitacene, and his widows were, in true Hindu fashion, made to undergo the ritual of sati by the remainder of the Cathaei troops at the scene. The first appearance in Western historiography of the practice of widow-burning, which appears in Diodoros and later Strabo (though not in so precise a fashion), is notable not only for the description of the act itself, but also for the way in which it is described: a vivid picture of the bejewelled widow being led to the funeral pyre, accompanied by chanting and ultimately burning death, endured in stoic silence by the woman herself.

In the aftermath of the campaign, Antigonus was master of the East. He quickly disposed of Peithon and many of the Upper Satraps with the army behind him. He chased Seleucus from his Babylonian satrapy and seized Ptolemy's territories in the Levant. These successes, combined with Olympias' defeat and murder by Cassander in the later months of 316, ended the Second War. Antigonus was master of Asia and Cassander, of Greece. The overwhelming superiority Antigonus now held was probably enough to allow him to restore Alexander's empire, but in the next wars, he would ultimately fail, and the empire would be permanently divided between the Antigonid, Seleucid, and Ptolemaic monarchies. Eumenes' death, in many ways, made the establishment of the new monarchies possible. He was the last of the legitimists, and was only seeking a Regency; without him, and Alexander IV (brutally murdered by Cassander along with his grandmother and mother), there was no unifying thread for the Empire, no actual legitimate king. Antigonus, Cassander, Lysimachus, Seleucus, and Ptolemy were thus free to assume the title of king at the Peace of the Dynasts a few years later.

Alexander's empire was irrevocably broken up, and Hellenistic history would proceed without it, for better or for worse.


Footnotes

[1] = Ceteus' name probably comes from the Greeks' description of his physique; the word ketos, or 'whale', may refer to a very large dude. Another theory is that it is a rendering of an Indic name ending in -ketu.
[2] = Guard. Usually about 300-600 of the most elite horsemen in a cavalry force; also refers to infantry units such as hypaspistai or the Silver Shields.

Sources

Bosworth, The Legacy of Alexander contains a very good description of the Iranian campaign in general, as well as a historiographical analysis of Hieronymus of Cardia, Eumenes' countryman and right hand man, who later served with Antigonus and his family with some distinction.

Diodorus Siculus' Bibliotheca Historia, while riddled with inaccuracies, contains the only digest of Hieronymus we have, and thus is the necessary resource for the Wars of the Diadochi.

Green, Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age is a fantastic general resource on the period. Very long, very well written, covers basically every sphere of Hellenistic life. It's transformed my knowledge of the period. This particular piece used Alexander to Actium somewhat tangentially, but it forms one of the only good histories of the Diadochi, especially in this era, and so gives great context.

Plutarch, Parallel Lives of the Greeks and Romans has a Life of Eumenes, which helped somewhat, but which is secondary to Diodorus in usefulness.
 
We literally just covered this yesterday in my class about the Hellenistic Age. Great job. :goodjob:
I wrote about it because I'm actually IN YOUR CLASS BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :run:

Actually, that's a really scary coincidence. Cool, though. :p
 
Good read. I had just finished Paw-Paw's overarching story of the Diadochi, a very convoluted backdrop to this. This treatment allows a coherent focus on a poignant part of the story. So more than any other Eumenes represented the most legitimate chance at unity and the succession of Alexander's son. It was a long shot and he was left out of the running at Triparadeisus. Before this, did Perdiccas go on a bloody purge, killing Barsine among others ?
I actually thought Antigonus would have been the likeliest contender for stability. Too bad he had to back Cassander instead of Eumenes. Ptolemy could keep Egypt. After this episode the only worthwhile contender was his son Demetrius Poliorcetes, if you ask me, but things were hopelessly fragmented by then. A few battle maps to go with the accompanying text of Paraetekene and Gabiene would be really great.
 
Top Bottom