The Core of Serbian Identity : The Battle of Kosovo

Otakumonkey

Chieftain
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
30
Location
Jersey
I've decided to post some of the essays I wrote in my AP world history class to this forum.


The Core of Serbian Identity


On 28 June 1389 the combined Serbian forces from the territories governed by Prince Lazer and Vuk Brankovic together with auxiliary troops sent by King Tvrtko of Bosnia faced Sultan Murad and his army on the field of Kosovo. It had been eighteen years since King Vukasin and Despot Uglijesa failed in their attempt to drive the Turks out of the Balkan Peninsula, and now the Serbian forces were definitely on the defensive. Given the general discord among Serbian lords in the decades following Dusan’s death, the fact that Lazar, Vuk, and Tvrtko were able to create an alliance against the Turks was reason for some optimism. No one at that time knew that the battle of Kosovo was to become a pivotal moment in the history of the Serbian people with repercussions that have lasted for centuries.



In 1388 the Ottoman Turkish army advanced into Bulgaria and forced Tsar Ivan Sisman to submission. Bulgaria became a vassal state of the Ottoman Empire in 1376, but vassal status never prohibited the sultan from continuing his attacks against the subject land. The 1380s saw the Ottomans making several moves against southern Bulgaria, and in 1385 they captured Sofia from Sisman. Sisman’s attempt to end his vassal relationship with the Turks resulted in disaster for the Bulgarians. They were once again forced to accept vassal status and had to surrender more territory Turks. More worryingly for the rest of the Balkan Peninsula however was the establishment of Turkish military camps within Bulgarian territory and the right to use the territory freely for Turkish troops to move deeper into the peninsula.


The Turkish advances into Bosnia and Bulgaria undoubtedly made Prince Lazar of the Serbs aware that it was only a matter of time until he faced another Turkish assault on his own territory. When it came, however, it was anything but a minor border skirmish or plundering raid. The Battle of Kosovo on 28 June 1389 was a full-fledged battle in the heartland of old Serbia.



The historian is faced with a difficult situation when he or she attempts to discover what occurred in the Battle of Kosovo. There are no eyewitness accounts of the battle, and rather significant differences exist among contemporary sources that do mention the event. What is known as fact is that a massive battle did take place on the field of Kosovo on 28 June 1389 between the Islamic Ottoman Turks under Sultan Murad I and the Christian forces led by Prince Lazar of Serbia. When the dust cleared, both leaders were dead and Murad’s son, Bayezid, returned to Edirne to secure his position. Beyond these meager details, not much else is known for certain. Early records are not particually concerned with armaments, tactics, size of forces, and the general course of battle. It is not even possible to determine which side was victorious on the field since the one thing rerecorded in all sources is that causalities on both sides were massive.


Myth, however, has taken place where history lacks. Prince Lazar became a martyr to the Serbs, having laid down his life to protect Kosovo from the marching hordes of the infidel. Kosovo came to represent not a military victory but a spiritual one. The myths describe the battle simply as a struggle between the forces of good and evil ; Murad with his band of bloodthirsty beasts and Lazar with his pious army of God fearing Christians. Lazer and his troops sacrificed themselves for the good of the people, and thus achieved spiritual victory through martyrdom, despite whether the battle was won militarily.


Kosovo became central in Serbian identity. The idea of standing up against tyranny and evil such as Prince Lazar did was partially the reason why Gavrilo Prinzip felt compelled to assassinate Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austria-Hungarian Empire. More recently, Slobodan Milosevic identified himself with Prince Lazar and the ethnic Albanians living in Kosovo as Turks, resulting in ethnic cleansing in order to purge these infidels from Serbian society. The identification of Serbian leaders with Lozar and Serbian enemies is not new. For hundreds of years the repercussions of the Battle of Kosovo have been felt in various conflicts between Serbs and others throughout the Balkan Peninsula.


Although not much is known historically about the Battle of Kosovo, its significance is not decreased. The myths surrounding the battle have placed the supposed sacrifice of Prince Lozar into the hearts of the Serbian people. As a result, the Battle of Kosovo has become central to Serbian identity throughout the past six hundred years.
 
This is actually one of my favorite essays. I had absolutely no knowledge on the topic before I began research. Extremely intresting.
 
I read that, as you say, this has become something like the big heroic epos or something for the Serbian people. They like to see it as the point where their excistance as a people began, their days of glory, etc. In the same article though, it said that this idea is historically wrong, for there was no Serbian people back then.
I must say it is a good article you wrote there though :goodjob: The myth you talk about suggests to me that this article I read is indeed right, and that later generations (during high-tides of nationalism) have changed it to what is has become today.
 
I have read about the Battle of Kosovo from the Ottoman perspective and I'll translate it onto this thread a little later, if any of you care.
 
Very well... here it is.... I've lived in the U.S. for many years so I don't exactly know all of the Turkic/Bosnian words. More specifically, the names for family members like "son in law" and so forth.

Either way:



Povijest Bosne - Account of Bosnia

By Salih Sidki Hadzihuseinovic

A Bosnian living in the Ottoman Empire around 1878

Poglavlje 1: Od prahistorije do gubitka bosanske srednjovjekovne drzavnosti

Chapter 1: From prehistory till the loss of medieval Bosnian independence

..... (Skipping many pages till the end of this chapter)

"... Because he had offered to, as a scout, take the imperial army... ... the Sultan in the year 789 (1387/1388 A.D.) sent an aid with 20,000 soldiers toward Bosnia, along with the above-mentioned Lala Shahin-Pasha. Because he listened to the aid's suggestions, Lala Shahin-Pasha ended up entering the Bosnian lands. In the beginning, since there was no one there to stand up against him, he sent the bulk of his army to loot the countryside, while he stayed in one place with around 1000 soldiers. However, the aid secretely told the Bosnian King Tvrtko, that Shahin-Pasha's army was spread out, and that he was left with only a tiny bit of an undisciplined army to guard him.

Hearing this, King Tvrtko struck Shahin-Pasha's army with his armies and those of his nobles, numbering around 30,000. Because the Ottoman army was spread out, wasn't able to come and help Shahin-Pasha, the above mentioned king ordered his army to attack any faction of the Ottoman army they met. Shortly, Shahin Pasha found himself to have stirred 100 troubles. Even if he had 20,000 Ottoman soldiers, 15,000 of them had been slaughtered, and the other 5000 had escaped only with many difficulties.

When the Sultan heard these painful news, that they had dealt Shahin Pasha a loss which the Ottoman army had till then never gone through... ... ...the sultan was enraged and thought of revenge never gave him peace. He sent out letters to all his allies, including all Christian leaders who had earlier come under his protection and recognized his rule, calling them to come together at the field near Jenishehir (Larisa in Greece).

... ... However based on the defeat of Shahin-Pasha's ranks, the Christian kingdoms concluded that the allmighty Sultanate was weakened... ... and let the Sultan know that they had no intention to help him. And while the Sultan tried to get the above-mentioned to agree, some Christian leaders were planning to attack the Ottoman army and to destroy it... ... ...

The Serbian king Lazar had made an agreement with the kings of Hungary, Poland, Bohemia, Bosnia, Croatia, and some other Croatian nobels, and that is what set up the battle of Kosovo field.

That's how the Tzar Lazar brought together a large Crusader army and sent hem against the Ottoman Empire. Sultan Murat then, with what army he had, clashed with the infidels at Kosovo field, and after a vicious battle beat the enemy. In this battle, the above-mentioned Tzar Lazar lost his life. The bulk of the Islamic army went on to kill the retreating enemy.

The allmighty Sultan had been so happy that he himself went out onto the field, and looked around and went through the fallen bodies. However, among those bodies was injured infidel, son in law of the mentioned Lazar, Milosh Obilic. When the Sultan found him, he got up and claimed that he wanted to accept his rule. Saying he wanted to kiss his hand, he went onward towards the Sultan. Even though the Sultan's advisors tried to prevent this, he was eventually allowed. So he came close to the Sultan and with a tiny poisoned knife which he had hidden in his hand, stabbed him in the stomach, killing him. The killer was killed right then and there.

This battle occured on Monday, 15th Shabana, in the year 791 (15th VI, 1389/1390 Islamic country) and is among the most important battles of the Ottoman empire. With that battle, the Serbian kingdom was destroyed, and so was their honor and pride, and that is for them a big misfortune and shame. When they talk of it, they talk about it regretfully, for in that battel had died the Serbian King Lazar, his 'tast' Jug Bogdan and 9 of his 'Shura', and Milos Obilic, son in law of Lazar, and Ivan Kosancic, and Milan, warlord of Toplica, and Stefan Music, allfell, and most of the remaining army was murdered. Of those who had stayed behind their swords, not one was capable of being a warlord.

Yet when the Christians account of this battle, they talk not of their cowardness and weakness. The Christian army had, in this battle, numbered around 100,000 people they say. Meanwhile, they also write that the Islamic Sultan sent against them a force three times that size, numbering around 300,000, along with the 'fact' that their first and most important commander of the Christian army, son-in-law of Lazar, Vuk Brankovic, betrayed them and crossed over to the side of the Sultan, so that only because of his traitoring had it come to their defeat.

In fact the Christian army had more than 200,000 knights, and the Islamic army, in comparasment, was very small. When the commanders of the infidel army saw the weak numbers of the Ottomans, they were greatly excited that they were to, undoubtedly, get a victory on their behalf. Among them, especially excited was the nephew of King Lazar, saying that he would defeat the Ottomans with just his brigade.

Some recommended to attack the Ottomans in the middle of the night, saying "Let's send them in a retreat, why allow them to escape our swords?". "Tomorrow by dawn, through an attack on the field, we will liquidate this army" said others, so the night attack was given up.

According to the writing of the Christians, thier army, compared to the Ottomans, had been miniscule... ... ...why tehn, seeing the might of the Ottoman army, had they not run instead of throwing themselves into a death-trap?... ... ... From what can be understood, both sides fought truthfully, but through the help of the allmighty, turthfull (god/allah) a winning wind was blwoing from the Islamic side and they, through god's help won."



There. That's the basic Ottoman account of it. From there, the book goes on to tell how medieval Bosnia was conquered by the Ottomans, and the rest of the Balkans overrun in the following years.
 
I find it remarkable already, that the Turks speak of Bosnians, and the Serbs of Serbs :p Kind of strengthens the thought that the birth of Serbia blabalbla is all made up later.
 
Originally posted by willemvanoranje
I find it remarkable already, that the Turks speak of Bosnians, and the Serbs of Serbs :p Kind of strengthens the thought that the birth of Serbia blabalbla is all made up later.


That is a very complicated debate, but I'd have to mostly agree with you. For all I know, we Bosnians may have once been a small slavic tribe that was a sub-set of the bigger Serbian tribe. Who knows. However, we've had about 1000 years of our own culture, and as far as I'm concerned, are a completely different people.

I'm about to finish off the translation, so check it out in about 10 minutes.

P.S. I'm not done till I say so in another post.
 
Yes, indeed. I don't know a lot of Yugoslavians (or I'd rather say, Bosnians, Serbs, Croats, Montenegrans, Slovenians, etc.), but I do know there's a difference. First of all, the Bosnians I know are mostly muslem, or their ancestors have been (names as Ibrahimovic are mixes of Salvic and Muslem culture I think), except for one that is catholic (but he's bosnian-croatian). And well, it's just small cultural stuff that I can see, and especially some kind of...well, not liking each other. My grandma's neighbour is originally Serbian, and eventhough she married a Croat, she still sometimes has the tendency to point at other Balkan people.

Ah well, there was once a big tribe in the area, and after the Turks started messing and other events happened, certain groups grew stronger, others divided, and in the end we are where we are now. I think. Cuz I still believe there was not such a thing as a Serbian people back then, with Serbian identity and Serbian culture. It was just a tribe that Serbs and others maybe originated from.

Still, I have never read original sources on this, I only base my statement on what I read from others, so my believe here isn't that strong and easy to overthrow ;)
 
Well, I still agree with most of what you're saying.

Anyways, I've finally finished translating the passage. You can read the whole thing now if you like :D
 
well, they are pretty convinced they were the only victors at the battle. I think this just shows again how subjectiv history really is. They once said history is written by the victors, here there's no victor, and you see what happens.
 
I know the battle of Kosovo (I live there) and There were the sultan has been killed there is a shrine now.
 
Originally posted by aaminion00
T However, we've had about 1000 years of our own culture, and as far as I'm concerned, are a completely different people.

A 1000 years of own culture? :rolleyes:

Ne preteruj, bolan. :)

Otakumonkey

I have some maps and order of battle at home, and texts but in Serbian.
 
Yes one thousand years.

2004 - 950 = 1054

1054 years of existance as a political entity.

Take ovay a century and a half to mark for development of independence.

Nearly 1000 years.

Da pogodim, ti mislis da je blize 12?
 
Originally posted by Srdjan
A 1000 years of own culture? :rolleyes:

Ne preteruj, bolan. :)

Otakumonkey

I have some maps and order of battle at home, and texts but in Serbian.
Srdjane jesi li iz Srbije?
 
Originally posted by aaminion00
Yes one thousand years.

2004 - 950 = 1054

1054 years of existance as a political entity.

Take ovay a century and a half to mark for development of independence.

Nearly 1000 years.

Da pogodim, ti mislis da je blize 12?

Bosnia was just another "independent" realm at Balkan. In Bosnia nature is not unique culture, nither seperate nation. "Bosnians" are mainly a mixture of Serbs and Croatas. Bosnians muslims, or better to say "Bosnjaks", are also Serbs or Croats. Sorry man, but it's sad to read Your posts about Ottomans, and their "influence" in Bosnia and Balkan. :(
Kako mogu da Ti Turci budu bliži od nas? :crazyeye:

Originally posted by Corey<PHT>
Srdjane jesi li iz Srbije?

Jesam. ;)
 
Originally posted by Srdjan
Bosnia was just another "independent" realm at Balkan

Yet one that went on to become the most powerful state in the West Balkans at one point and remained as some sort of political entity for 1156 years or so while having a unique religion and form of self identity for just a few centuries less.

Originally posted by Srdjan
In Bosnia nature is not unique culture

Bosnia had a distinct religion, dialect, sovereign history, cultural influence, style of writing, and identity for centuries.

Originally posted by Srdjan
nither seperate nation.

:confused: If you tried to explain this to people well learned in history you'd get laughed at. Bosnia had been a country seperate from any other in the region for as long as Croatia.

Originally posted by Srdjan
"Bosnians" are mainly a mixture of Serbs and Croatas. Bosnians muslims, or better to say "Bosnjaks", are also Serbs or Croats.

:lol: Way too oversimplified. First is brushing aside years of nationalist debate on the exact ethnogenetic history of Bosnia and Hertzegovina through the ages by using the compromise "they were serbs and croats". Then you draw a neat little line and everybody that matters is happy. In reality the Serb influence among Bosniaks only came in the mid 1800's when Serbs kicked out their Muslims from the Belgrade Pashaluk and burned down the mosques. It's quite sad, at one time Belgrade had dozens of mosques, now it has one. Correction, it just lost that one around a month ago too :rolleyes:. Todays Bosniaks cannot be described as Serbs and Croats because that's far too simplistic, simply nationalistic garbage. Bosniaks are really an ethnic identity built off of any Muslim family that converted in the European realms of the Ottoman empire during the past 600 years or so. For a while Bosnia's muslims were no different than their ancenstors in the medieval Bosnian state, but as violence against Muslims escalated, a vast majority of Muslims in East Europe all came to Bosnia. Take into account the uniqueness Bosnia already posessed and it's impossible to pinpoint what Bosniaks are. I can trace my ancestors back to the 1480's for example and I guarrantee you they were neither Croat or Serb. They are a unique people built off the roots of people such as the first-wave Slavs, Celts, Illyrians, Croats, Serbs, Vlachs, Hungarians, Turks, and a wide variety of others. Saying that Bosniaks are a mixture of Croats and Serbs would be like saying that Serbs are actually a mix of medieval Serbs, Croats, Turks, and Vlachs.

Originally posted by Srdjan
Sorry man, but it's sad to read Your posts about Ottomans, and their "influence" in Bosnia and Balkan. :(
Kako mogu da Ti Turci budu bliži od nas? :crazyeye:

:confused: What did I write man? I copied it off of a Bosniak book from the 19th century. Yes, if it concerns you that much I consider our nation closer to Serbs and Croats than to Turks... by language and blood at least. But if you mean which nation I'd sooner trust there's no comparasment.
 
Originally posted by aaminion00
Yet one that went on to become the most powerful state in the West Balkans at one point and remained as some sort of political entity for 1156 years or so while having a unique religion and form of self identity for just a few centuries less.

A most powerful state in the west Balkan. :crazyeye: Even stronger than Hungary and Serbia at that time? :D

Originally posted by aaminion00
Bosnia had a distinct religion, dialect, sovereign history, cultural influence, style of writing, and identity for centuries. [/B]

Yes. Bosnia and Herzegovina have sovereign history, culture (I'm not sure about this), and style of lunguange, not writing. As You know, Bosnians use Serbian alfabet and grammar rules, made by Vuk Kradzic.

Originally posted by aaminion00
I can trace my ancestors back to the 1480's for example and I guarrantee you they were neither Croat or Serb.
[/B]

Are You from a royal family? 1480. wow :goodjob:
Or maybe Your ancestor is Kulin Ban?:cry:
 
Top Bottom