Go West and Conquer! - The Price of an Insult

Knight-Dragon

Unhidden Dragon
Retired Moderator
Joined
Jun 25, 2001
Messages
19,961
Location
Singapore
In 1206, all the clan lords of the newly unified Mongol nation were gathered in a khuriltai on the banks of the Onon river in the heart of Mongolia. They were gathered to issue a proclamation and confirmed that Temujin was Genghis Khan, Emperor of all the Mongols. The greatest military enterprise in history was now on the very brink of eruption.

Genghis led the Mongols on repeated campaigns into the beleagured Tangut kingdom of Xi Xia, merely a stone throw's away to the south, and also against the Jurchen Jin Empire in N China, hated enemies and probable instigators in the death of Yesugei, father to Genghis. The invasions were successful enough to force the Xi Xia into a form of vassalage and to force the Jin to abandon their capital at present-day Beijing, and moved south to Kaifeng. The Mongols looked set to launch a full scale invasion of China, land of legendary wealth and seat of their hated Jurchen enemies.

Or so the Mongols thought.

The leaders of the Naiman confederation in the steppes to the west, the last Turco-Mongol tribe to be defeated by Genghis and absorbed into the new Mongol nation, had been defeated in the wars of 1204-05. Nonetheless, the Naiman nation mostly escaped and continued to resist. In particular, the heir to the last Naiman khan had seized control of the Kara Khitai state, the last remnant of the Khitan Liao Empire that was supplanted by the ferocious Jurchens.

Jochi, eldest of Genghis' heirs, was expected to establish himself a fief farthest away from the homeland, as his inheritance, in accordance to Mongol tradition. Genghis assigned the great general Jebe to him, and ordered them to pursue and execute this last Naiman leader. This was all but completed in 1218, but as they pursued the Naiman remnants even further west, the Mongols came across the powerful Khwarazmians, whose territories bordered directly on the Kara Khitai's western borders.

Genghis didn't seem to have any designs on this Turkic realm; his eyes probably set on righteous vengeance against the Jurchens. He offered to share the world with Ala al-Din Muhammad II, Shah of Khwarazm and promote trade between their realms. The Mongol armies were engaged in N China, battling the tough Jurchen cavalrymen and their N Chinese infantry levies. Genghis had least need of an added distraction on the other end of the Mongol world.

The Shah, however, had other thought. Proud and bridling under this supposed patronage of the upstart Mongols, he planned a suitable retort. The Khwarazmian realm was huge, stretching across Transoxiana and south into Afghanistan, eastern Persia and included as well parts of N India. Theirs were a powerful military state, and heirs to centuries-old Turkic states in this vast region. The Shah did not fear the Mongols.

In 1218, or perhaps 1219, a caravan inclusive of several Mongol envoys reached Otrar, northwest of Tashkent. The local governor, a relative of the Shah and clearly with instructions from his lord, seized the envoys and had them all killed. This was a horrendous insult to the Mongols, especially to someone as honourable as Genghis Khan.

Genghis Khan assembled a khuriltai to plan the campaign. The armies in China were pulled back, with only a skeletal force under the command of Mukhali remaining to keep the Jurchens harried. Jebe, and Subotei, were assigned to lead the army, with Jochi as the head. The actual operations were, of course, planned and carried out by this brilliant pair of commanders. Genghis himself accompanied this army as it moved westwards beyond the Dzungarian Basin into modern Kazakhstan.

The Khwarazmian Shah probably laughed. The Mongol army was outnumbered, and operating far away from its homeland. He had nothing to fear, with his army of Turkic and Iranic warriors, numbering in the hundreds of thousands. The Khwarazmians were self-assured of being able to deal with these upstart barbarians whose chief styled himself as 'universal ruler'. Ha!

In the autumn of 1219, the Mongol army turned south, into the northern portion of Transoxiana, with its many rich cities. Genghis Khan employed all the tricks in the book, in particular depending heavily on the use of terror and psychological warfare. Cities were informed that they would be spared if they surrendered, and obliterated if not. Many were indeed, as it turned, completely obliterated, and the populations put to the sword. Though the Mongols shrewdly spared certain classes of craftsmen, who were attached to their army or else sent back to Mongolia.

The terror had begun.

The cowardly Shah never brought his army together to meet the Mongols head-on. In the spring of 1220, the Mongols plundered and burned Bukhara, the region's greatest center of learning and wealth. Samarkand followed soon after. Persian sources gave a figure of 12000 to 20000 for that Mongol army Genghis himself led to take Bukhara and then Samarkand. Samarkand was said to be defended by an elite garrison of 110000 Turks and Persian Tadjikhs, but still fell easily.

The Khwarazmian resistance collapsed. The Mongols drove on into Afghanistan and eventually reached the Indus river in modern Pakistan, south of Peshawar. By then, the Mongol forces were very far away from home. Disease began to take its toll, and morale wavered.

Then Genghis ordered the Mongols to return, in 1221. The Xi Xia Tanguts had rebelled.

En route back to Mongolia, Genghis spent some months in 1222 camped in the Hindu Kush. There he met a seventy-year-old well-known Daoist called Qiu Chuji, who was said to have learned the secret of long life and was 300 years old. The Daoist had been invited all the way there from China. Their discussions about the meaning of life in May/June 1222 and all through the fall and winter of 1222-23 revealed much about Genghis Khan, the man; as the Mongol army marched in easy stages back home.

Before beginning on the long journey back, Genghis approved plans for a continuation of the Western Asian campaign, to be led, again, by Jebe and Subotei, and his son, Jochi, as nominal head. A Mongol force led by the two generals pushed on westwards to the south of the Caspian Sea, then turned north into the Caucasus and entered the Kipchak steppe of S Russia. It was a formidable operation, involving a winter crossing of the Caucasus Mountains.

In June 1223, the Mongols met and defeated a combined Russian-Polovtsy army at the Kalka river, on the northern shores of the Sea of Azov. This was the first blow inflicted on the Russians. In the meantime, Jochi and his force had continued northwards along the eastern side of the Caspian Sea. The two forces met somewhere in S Russia in 1223 or early 1224. A permanent Mongol garrison was set up to hold the region against the Kipchak Turks.

Then in 1225, Genghis Khan, who had been lingering in the region north of Lake Balkhash, ordered all the Mongol forces to return home, for a final showdown with the Tanguts. Thus ended the Mongols' very first campaign into the West.
 
What was it about the mongols that allowed them to defeat army after army. Did they imploy some new tactic, weapon? or were they just ruthless?
 
I've heard that intimidation was important in the Mongol advances. After word of previous massacres and eatings of skin reached them, some cities surrendered without resistance.

Their tactics were very fast and fluid, and made devastating use of horse archers and skirmish-style guided strikes. They could tear many more rigid formations to pieces.
 
They also rolled-over on their success, taking in defeated armies as their frontal 'shock' troops (read cannon-fodder), and fielding larger and larger armies as they went on.

And the Mongols had no qualms about taking in able people of other ethnicities, or using their technology and tactics.

And the initial Mongol successes were stunning in their own right - a masterpiece of multi-unit synchronized attacks, and field manoevurs. :eek:
 
Originally posted by andrewgprv
What was it about the mongols that allowed them to defeat army after army. Did they imploy some new tactic, weapon? or were they just ruthless? [/QUOTE

well for one thing the mongols fought as one, the khan had added disipline to their already good fighting abilities-a bad combantion for their foes. armies like the kharazmians had numbers, but a army of 20 nationalities and differant units isn't a match for a army thats one( the mongols used foreignors but cobined them into their army) the persians loses to alexander and the greeks earlier showed that huge, but unwheelly armies are not a match for a smaller disiplane force
 
A footnote:

The Governor of Otrar, the guy who killed the Mongol traders, did'nt end up doign much good for himself by that act. When the Mongols caught him, they poured molten lead down his ears and eyes. OUCH!!!!:eek::eek:
 
It's also said that the Mongols defeated some of the more powerful armies by sending in a small garrison. The enemy would be overconfident, give chase with major forces. Only to see in the distance the whole Mongolian army letting loose with arrows. Also, the "horse" of the Mongols was weird. It was not tall and stout like those in other parts of the world, but short and stumpy. But it proved to be a great power, as Mongolian cavalry would run circles around the enemy, pumping them full of arrows. There is a great 2-3 part series in the National Geographic explaining everything, with a 4 page map of Asia and the Mongolian empire included with battles and everything.
 
The Mongols rode hardy Mongolian ponies, rather than large warhorses. These creatures have incredible endurance and can survive anywhere and eat anything.
 
XIII, since you're such a Mongol supporter, can you fill in some more of your input in the 'Mongols vs. Byzantines' thread (also in this World History category). XEN somehow cannot be convinced that the Mongol hordes will crush those lame Byzs to pieces. :)
 
I have more important things to do than bother with his Roman-centric views. :p

I've done so in previous threads already, particularly in the two Mongol vs Native American threads - if he's not convinced, it's not my problem. ;)
 
I've changed my opinion on the plains indians, I'll grant you that, but the fact of the matter is, the Byzantines could just whoop mongol bott

*yes, i am a bt Romano-centric, but the forum has had its share of ever yother type of centric as well, and beides, I acknowledge the achevements of non-Roman civs
 
When you discuss past events, it's good to be un-biased in your views to get a accurate representation of history. I'm not Mongolian but I'm pretty sure they could beat India for instance. In fact when Tamerlane invaded Delhi(one of the best kingdoms of India at the time), he made a a very strong attack that wiped out the Sultan's army.
 
its all relative though- when I say Mongolia couldent defeat Byzantium, you'll do well to notwe that I refer to a sepfic age in Byzantine history- it is also the most famous age, and what people tend to think of when they think Byzantium, but thats beside the point- could mongolia have defeated india- yes at certain points in Indian history, but not through its entire pre-mass gun use history
 
Originally posted by andrewgprv
What was it about the mongols that allowed them to defeat army after army. Did they imploy some new tactic, weapon? or were they just ruthless?

they had sturupps, which allowed them to shoot arrows on horseback.
 
armies had using horse back archers from the time of the late bronze age- the Assyrians pioneered the use of mounted archers
 
Top Bottom