The Rus! - The Story of Russian Beginnings

Xen

Magister
Joined
Feb 10, 2003
Messages
16,004
Location
Formosa
The Slavs of Novgorod had been forced to pay tribute to raiding Varyagi (a.k.a. Varangians or Vikings) throughout the early 800s AD, but eventually rose up and drove the Varangians "beyond the seas." Tribal feuds, however, prevented the Slavs from forming an effective confederation. So in 862 AD, several Slavic tribes agreed to invite Rurik (right), Sineus and Truvor, three famous Viking warriors of Ross (a.k.a. Rhos) to rule them. Rurik settled at Novgorod, then a small trading post. Sineus and Truvor settled at two nearby towns, but died shortly thereafter. Rurik united the local tribes and towns, making Novgorod a prosperous center of trade until his death in 879 AD and starting the dynasty the ruled Kievan Russ until the 1200s.

Rurik was succeeded by his kinsmen Oleg who conquered Kiev in 882 AD. With Kiev as his capital, he then set about expanding his borders and controlling the lucrative trade route from Novgorod through to the Black Sea. In 907 AD, Oleg led an army of 80,000 with 2000 boats on a raid on Constantinople, moving his boats overland on wheels to avoid chains placed in the Bosphorus straights. This raid,although failing in its attempt to even get into Constantinople, let alone pillage it, failed, it and subsequent expeditions into the Black Sea prompted Byzantium to negotiate a favorable commercial treaty with the Rus in 911 AD, which also resulted in Byzantine recruitment of its fabled Varangian Guard, including famous mercenary and future Viking king Harald Hardrada.(three cheers to Kafka2!)

Oleg was succeeded by Rurik's son Igor, who ruled Kiev from 912-945 AD. Igor was the last of the Rus leaders to bear a Scandanavian name; the balance were Slavic in derivation. In 912 AD, Igor negotiated a safe passage for portage of his fleet through Khazar territory to raid Muslim cities in the Caspian Sea, but the Rus atrocities so outraged the Khazars that they ambushed and destroyed the Rus fleet at Itil (913 AD). Igor's next great exploit was the 941 AD raid on Constantinople, which resulted in disaster for the Rus when they ran into a Byzantine fleet using Greek Fire. Another Rus Caspian expedition in 943 AD resulted in the sack of Muslim Barda, which the Rus held against counterattacks until an epidemic forced them to withdraw.

After Igor's death, his wife Olga (945-969 AD) ruled as regent and became the first of the Rus rulers to accept Christianity. During Olga's regency, her pagan son Grand Prince Svyatoslav launched a series of punitive campaigns (966-971 AD) southwest into Bulgaria, south against the Khazars to the Caspian Sea, up the Volga River on a punitive expedition against their trade competitors, the Volga Bulgars, and west to the sea of Azov (966-971 AD). Svyatoslav's campaign to conquer Bulgaria resulted in the sack of Preslav and Philippolois, but came to an abrupt end in July 971 AD when the Byzantines intervened. Not too long after Olga relinquished the throne to Svyatoslav (969-972 AD), his luck ran out. The ruler of Rus fell in an ambush and suffered the indignity of having his skull used as a Pecheneg drinking cup. Svyatoslav's first son, Yaropolk then ruled uneventfully for eight years (972-980 AD).

In 980 AD, Svyatoslav's second son, Prince Vladimir (later Saint Vladimir) inherited the crown thanks to an army recruited in Sweden. Vladimir embraced Christianity and allied himself with Byzantium, marrying the sister of the Byzantine emperor, Anna, in 988 AD. He was famous as a law giver and for his charity. He decreed the conversion of Novgorod and Kiev to orthodox Christianity ("The Baptism of Russia"), and expanded Kievan Rus with successful campaigns against the Poles, Bulgars and Pechenegs. He organized the expanded Kingdom as a confederation with his sons assigned to rule each region in rotation.

When Vladimir died in 1015 AD, he left six sons to vie for the crown. His eldest son, Svyatopolk the Damned seized the cities of his Christian brothers Boris and Gleb and had them put to death. Svyatopolk then ruled (1015-1019 AD) until his death. The two remaining sons, Yaroslav and Mistislav split the kingdom and ruled jointly until Mistislav's death in 1036. In 1041 AD, an army recruited by the Scandanavian Ingvar the Widefarer skirted the eastern boundaries of Russ and down the Volga to raid the coasts of the Caspian Sea before striking east and disappearing in some unrecorded disaster. In 1043 AD, a Russ fleet mounted the last raid on Constantinople, but were soundly defeated. Their survivors were hunted down and killed or captured at Varna on the west coast of the Black Sea.

Yarolsav continued to reign until his death in 1054 AD, earning the sobriquet "the Wise" for his law codes (the Pravda) and his efforts to promote the church. This period was known as the Golden Age of Kievan Rus. After Yarolsav's death, pressure from nomadic tribes and isolationism resulting from the schism between Western and Eastern Orthodox churches resulted in gradual Kievan decline. The unified state of Rus, which had grown to encompass most of present day Russia, Byelorus and Ukraine, was effectively fragmented into a loose confederation of highly independent principalities.

As a historical aside, the Scandanavian nature of Kievan Rus is a subject of some historical controversy. Certainly, leaders such as Rurik and Oleg were of Scandanavian origin, as were many of their followers. Viking migrations along the river trading routes east and south to Byzantium are well documented in the Primary Russian Chronicle, written in the 12th Century. The name Rus is usually attributed to the Viking tribe Ross or Rhos, which was known at the time in the court of Byzantium. Other historians (especially many Russian historians) minimize the impact of the Vikings on the largely Slavic population and argue that "Rus" is derived from a Slavic tribe of the same name that lived in that region on the banks of the Ros river
 
Originally posted by amirsan
I always wanted to know the history of Russia, not many history books have it...

There are literally thousands of books on Russian history. A good book to start with is Russia and the Russians by Geoffrey Hoskings. It provides a good overview starting from the earliest times all the way through the downfall of Communism.
 
Excellent article, Xen. I knew of the Russian orgins but not in so much detail as this. Good read. :)
 
Originally posted by Xen
...Oleg was succeeded by Rurik's son Igor, who ruled Kiev from 912-945 AD. Igor was the last of the Rus leaders to bear a Scandanavian name; the balance were Slavic in derivation.
This is not a Scandinavian name, as far as I know. And I don't get that balance thing. :confused:
Originally posted by Xen
...Yarolsav ...
Yaroslav ;)
Originally posted by Xen ...As a historical aside, the Scandanavian nature of Kievan Rus is a subject of some historical controversy. Certainly, leaders such as Rurik and Oleg were of Scandanavian origin, as were many of their followers. Viking migrations along the river trading routes east and south to Byzantium are well documented in the Primary Russian Chronicle, written in the 12th Century. The name Rus is usually attributed to the Viking tribe Ross or Rhos, which was known at the time in the court of Byzantium. Other historians (especially many Russian historians) minimize the impact of the Vikings on the largely Slavic population and argue that "Rus" is derived from a Slavic tribe of the same name that lived in that region on the banks of the Ros river
One theory is that Rus is the same as the Ros in Roslagen (litt. "the Ros law"). This is the coastal area north west of Stockholm in Sweden. And those Russian historians that "minimize the impact of the Vikings" are mostly driven by Nationalism, IMO. BTW I'm not trying to say that the Vikings were great, just that I think it's bad to lie just to make "your own" history look good.

All in all a good article, Xen. :thumbsup:
 
Igor = Ingvar :)
 
Originally posted by mrtn
. And I don't get that balance thing. :confused:
"The Balance" is used in idiom to mean 'the remainder'.
 
Actually, I believe the name Oleg comes from Scandinavic language and means "holy". I can't remember where I read, but I'm pretty sure that I read it. :)
Also, I read the article and it misses a lot of stuff I read in quite a few books on the early Rus. Of course those books are written by Russian historians, so I am not sure, but that could be a factor. In any way, I decided to read up on early Rus in both English (non Russian) and Russian books and compare, if anyone is interested, I might summarize the differences and post them here, letme know...
 
this is just some summery I found ona I site- though it was neast, so I posted it here
 
ok, that would explain it too, I don't trust web sites too much, I have found on numerous occasions that most of them are not trustworthy and contradict themselves. But the one you posted is not that bad at all... Still, if you'd like, I could PM you some sort of a summary of what is not included and you could revise the article to incorporate that... But it is a good article as is any way... Good job educating people on Russian history, I find the early Rus, Peter the Great, Cathrine the Great and the Napoleonic war some of the most interesting history!!! But I must admit to prejudice since I am Russian... :mischief:
 
instea dof PMing me, why not just post them in this thread, an dlet everyone know what was left out :)
 
It's just a website you posted? And there was I being so pleased at the revelation that you *can* type accurately after all!

An interesting read though. I've always thought Kievan Rus was more fun than the Muscovite variety. All those caves.
 
klopolov said:
Actually, I believe the name Oleg comes from Scandinavic language and means "holy". I can't remember where I read, but I'm pretty sure that I read it. :)
Oleg, ru.=Helge, sw.="the Holy" or possibly "the Sanctified".
(Mod. swed. "helig"=holy.):)
 
Plotinus said:
It's just a website you posted? And there was I being so pleased at the revelation that you *can* type accurately after all!

An interesting read though. I've always thought Kievan Rus was more fun than the Muscovite variety. All those caves.


yeah, the last hurrah of my old computer you might say I had quite a library, but then the old gal died of spyware) this article wa samougst the few I ever got around to copy+pasteing her eon the forums
 
Verbose said:
Oleg, ru.=Helge, sw.="the Holy" or possibly "the Sanctified".
(Mod. swed. "helig"=holy.):)

Norwegian: Helge (a fairly common name), holy = hellig, heilag. ;)
 
Nice write-up Xen. I would only add a disclaimer about this being "Russian" origins. Modern Ukraine and Belarus both have an equal claim to Rus origins, just as valid as Russia's. Because of recent history these two are seen as subordinate peripheral peoples or countries, little "Russias", but they have very much their own histories separate from modern Russia's.

Ancient Rus became the nucleus for an Eastern Slavic civilization that flourished c. 9th century to the 12th-13th, but when it came apart and fell victim to the Mongol invasion, the core regions that would later form Russia, Ukraine and Belarus separated from one another and drifted culturally from each other. The Ukrainian and Belarus lands fell to foreign invaders (Tartars, Lithuanians, Poles) and were isolated from events in the northern Eastern Slavic lands that would eventually lead to the formation of Russia under Muscovite rule.

Russians still insist that Russia is the only direct ancestor of Rus, and that Ukraine and Belarus are in turn ancestors of Russia (not directly from Rus). The reality is however that while Russia would eventually develop to be the pre-eminent product of Rus' civilization, it is not the only one any more than modern Germans can claim to be the only true ancestors of the ancient Germanic tribes, rejecting Danish, Dutch, Swedish and etc. claims to Germanic derivation.
 
Russians still insist that Russia is the only direct ancestor of Rus, and that Ukraine and Belarus are in turn ancestors of Russia (not directly from Rus).
:confused:

I don't! Most Russian people I know, will freely admit that Ukraine has as many roots in Rus as Russia does, maybe even more. After all, Kiev is said to be "the mother of Russian cities". My best friend is from Belarus and he claims that their roots go back to Poles... I don't know much about the history of Belarus and Poland to add anything on that subject, but please, support your claim that Russians would deny Ukraine it's heritage with some proof... If you could also direct me to some good sources of information on the history of Belarus, that would be greatly appreciated.

than modern Germans can claim to be the only true ancestors of the ancient Germanic tribes

I think you mean vice versa...
 
Vrylakas said:
Nice write-up Xen. I would only add a disclaimer about this being "Russian" origins. Modern Ukraine and Belarus both have an equal claim to Rus origins, just as valid as Russia's. Because of recent history these two are seen as subordinate peripheral peoples or countries, little "Russias", but they have very much their own histories separate from modern Russia's.

Ancient Rus became the nucleus for an Eastern Slavic civilization that flourished c. 9th century to the 12th-13th, but when it came apart and fell victim to the Mongol invasion, the core regions that would later form Russia, Ukraine and Belarus separated from one another and drifted culturally from each other. The Ukrainian and Belarus lands fell to foreign invaders (Tartars, Lithuanians, Poles) and were isolated from events in the northern Eastern Slavic lands that would eventually lead to the formation of Russia under Muscovite rule.

Russians still insist that Russia is the only direct ancestor of Rus, and that Ukraine and Belarus are in turn ancestors of Russia (not directly from Rus). The reality is however that while Russia would eventually develop to be the pre-eminent product of Rus' civilization, it is not the only one any more than modern Germans can claim to be the only true ancestors of the ancient Germanic tribes, rejecting Danish, Dutch, Swedish and etc. claims to Germanic derivation.


Bravo! If you have a history of how Ukraine came to be a seperate nation that would be awesome to see and read. (Now, read again replacing Ukraine with Belarus.) :)
 
Xen said:
So in 862 AD, several Slavic tribes agreed to invite Rurik (right), Sineus and Truvor, three famous Viking warriors of Ross (a.k.a. Rhos) to rule them.
A few words about Rurik and his brother Sineus and Truvor. Some historians supposed there was Scandinavian konung Rurik (from Utland or Sweden or Baltic Coast), but there were no Sineus and Truvor. Realy one ancient historian translated from Scandinavian to Russian "Rurik sine hus thru voring (or woring, waring)" as "Rurik Sineus Truvor". But this phrase must be translated as "Rurik with his family and warriors". May be some Sweden, Danish or Norwegian could answer this question: is "Rurik sine hus thru woring" means "Rurik with his family and warriors"?
 
Top Bottom