Instruction Thread 2600 Bc

My suggestion would be: Set up a poll and run it. If it passes, DS can modify the "Core Rules" in the LRR forum.

This time it's a little late, but we'll try to be on time for future sessions!
 
I like the way this thread is working. It is much more clear to me what we are going to do.

Can we set a precident that the turn player post this thread 24-48 hours before a game session and order be in 24 hours before game session in case we have compatibility issues?

This is the guideline (sometimes rule) we played previous demogames with.
 
My suggestion would be: Set up a poll and run it. If it passes, DS can modify the "Core Rules" in the LRR forum.

This time it's a little late, but we'll try to be on time for future sessions!
A better way is to start a discussion using that proposal in the rules thread, get any comments and suggestions out of the way and THEN poll the final version.

As it is, we've got a poll up with a proposal, and already have changes to it. That really invalidates the entire poll.

-- Ravensfire
 
I agree with blastoid that HA should come before library, but I can also see the the arguments for the library
 
I just think that if we are not running a scientist specialist that the library is not as usefull to us right now as a horse archer. The science gain we will get is not large, maybe 3 beakers. If we use it to run a specalist the gain is around 7 beakers plus we start building are first great person. I feel that if we use a specalist it is worth making the library. If the specalist is going to come along later then a horse archer will be more usefull.
Since we will be loaning our pigs to the warlords i am not sure how well we can support a science specalist at this time.
 
Actually, right after the previous turnchat, and completed 72 h before the next
 
Top Bottom